No replies on the first post so let's try this. We have NT4 back up on a
box running sqlserver but the guy did not name the sql server the name
it was backing up under. My guess is this is why we are seeing nothing
looking to restore the db's. Having never done this, how can I restore a
database ba
We have a very old Windows NT 4 server that was using Client 5.1.5.15
and an old version of TDPSql that just crashed. The TDPSql version I'm
not sure of but was hoping the log files from the client will tell me.
I believe it goes way back to 2.2.1, maybe earlier. Not sure if anyone
knows if log fil
You are of course correct. It is AES 128.
My apologies!
W
On 3/7/08, Michael Stempf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe TSM can only encrypt up to AES 128 & DES 56, I do not believe it
> has been updated to support AES 256.
> Michael
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Wanda Prather <[E
I believe TSM can only encrypt up to AES 128 & DES 56, I do not believe it
has been updated to support AES 256.
Michael
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Wanda Prather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The TSM clients (including TDP's) can encrypt at AES 256. You take a hit
> on
> performance for bot
On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:18 PM, T. Lists wrote:
Anyone out there using TSM with Virtuozzo? V4.0
Virtuozzo. If so, I got a few questions for you!!
The documentation from Parallels leaves a bit to be
desired. Needless to say, I am a bit confused.
I don't know about Virtuozzo 4.0 but I've used Ope
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:55:16 -0500, Richard Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ahhh, that's nothing I've got 348 rmt devices on both of my big tsm
> servers.
> 66 PRI drives, and 282 ALT drives.
Aha. Well, so fortified, I will soldier on.
Thanks for the light, streaming back to us benigh
Anyone out there using TSM with Virtuozzo? V4.0
Virtuozzo. If so, I got a few questions for you!!
The documentation from Parallels leaves a bit to be
desired. Needless to say, I am a bit confused.
Neve
>
> 8 drives * 2 ports * 4 HBAs = 64 rmt devices for my 8 drives.
Ahhh, that's nothing I've got 348 rmt devices on both of my big tsm
servers.
66 PRI drives, and 282 ALT drives.
We used the one HBA to multiple tape drives method. But, I use multiple
zones
for library and grouping of drives i
Well, for what it's worth --
I have a 3584, 16 LTO drives (10 LTO4, 6 LTO2), and two SAN switches.
I have all the odd-numbered drives in switch 1 and all the even numbered drives
in switch 2.
My TSM server has 8 fibers for tape access - 4 in each switch. I've set up 4
zones in each switch - on
Dredging up a conversation from last year. I know in theory the horse
is dead, but I think I might have seen a twitch.
>> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:35:56 +0100, Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Really I've never seen anybody recommend anything above one zone per
> HBA.
The 'Implementing IBM
Hi,
I need to trace file restoration for security need.
I wouldn't like my users to be aware of that - In a first solution, Is
there any way to know which data has been restored on the server side?
I'ld like to provide my users with dsmj. However dsmj doesn't produce
any trace as the dsmc outpu
Hello!
We need to migrate NAS data from EMC Celerra to IBM NS5200. The network
connection on the source is only 100 MB. We tried copying using Robocopy on
CFS-mounted source and target filesystems using a Windows server. The transfer
was painfully slow (about 60 GB in four days). There about a
12 matches
Mail list logo
