Hi All
Aix is robust,stable,scalable os and having lot of features in it.
On top of it both tsm and aix are from same vendor IBM.so you
Can decide based on above factors
Koti Reddy
Sr.Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [
I think of it less of a question of OS, more of a question of hardware. It is
very hard to find an x86 server that has the bus structure to handle the 11
HBA's I am using.
The first concern for me is what does the hardware need to handle? After that,
I was down to non-x86 hardware. If your ex
Del,
I had the APAR in front of me as I started to type, but my
symptoms appeared to be different. But I tried the rename
node and rneame filespace approach and it worked just fine.
However, that requires the sysadmin to change both the
dsm.opt and the scheduled service. With a couple of dozen
m
I believe it depends on the size of your environment. For example what I
have seen instances with roughly up to 20GB DB runs fine on Windows.
After that AIX or the dinosaur.
My thoughts
Regards
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
G
Ahh I love a good religious war;-)
I have found that in the various TSM installations our company has
across the world, the of AIX/IBM hosts are more stable and better
performing servers. They also seem better able to sustain higher rates
of I/O than the other platforms.
The other OS/host com
Hello all,
I just wanted to get some opinions on which people prefer, having a TSM
Server on a Windows server or AIX. Currently our TSM environment is on AIX
and I just wanted to know if it is worth while to migrate to a Windows
platform. Thanks
Greg
Hi Fred,
This is a known issue. Search on Google, www.ibm.com,
and/or this list and you will see multiple hits with
what you need to do to get around it.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 03/14/2007
12:02:18 PM:
> We changed
We changed the management class on a group of MSSQL machines
and started to see a lot of errors coming from MSSQL that
also cause failed backups. The DBA tried to do a manual
backup and received ANS0328E.
Fred Johanson
Hi
Sorry yes, this is a Windows client and a Solaris server.
I'm pretty sure I don't have the 'find' option for Solaris (or if I do I
can't find it), but I will get the Windows admin to check his client and
let me know.
Many thanks
Farren
|-+-
Well, it would help to know what platform you are on.
But for Windows and UNIX clients, you start the client GUI, click
RESTORE, then from the top menu select EDIT -> FIND.
There is a very nice SEARCH capability that lets you search on names,
parts of names, size, date, etc.
Wanda Prather
"I/O,
Hello again for the second time today
I'm trying to restore some files for a user even though we are not sure
where those file actually are. They are part of a content
manager/commonstore env and as such have very unhelpful names.
Anyway, is there a way to use the pick option (or something else)
Depends.
If all you are managing is your DB backups, you are correct.
However, remember that if somebody creates EXPORT or BACKUPSET tapes,
they are also tracked in volume history. If you delete those records,
TSM loses track of them and they could get overwritten.
Wanda Prather
"I/O, I/O, It's
Many thanks Gary
Helpful and concise as always. I think what I'm going to do is just keep
about six months worth.
Much appreciated
Farren
|-+---|
| "Lee, Gary D."| |
| <[
Sir:
Depends on what you want to have available. I let my volume history
grow. This is because I occasionally need to know the history of a
particular tape cartridge.
After it goes back to scratch, tsm loses its error information. I can
use the volhist to see how many times it has cycled throug
Good morning people
This is such an old question but I have just been thinking about something
and want to make sure that my understanding is correct.
When I want to delete volume history information, am I right in assuming
that I can delete anything older than my oldest database backup.
For exa
15 matches
Mail list logo
