Use two different node names, one for each OS. There is no way to avoid
this. I've tried, and I've lost data that way, even though one of my OSs
was able to mount the other's file system. You must consider dual-boot
as two different machines.
Using two node names is the only way you can guarantee
Why wouldn't you just run "define dbvol" and create a 12g volume? Then
just delete the 9gB one, and it will move the data over.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Roger Deschner
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:45 AM
To: ADSM
If I have a database volume A, which is 9gb, and then I define a copy
with DEFINE DBCOPY A B, and B is 12gb, then I know it will only use 9gb
on either A or B. This is what the manual says.
However, what happens if I then DELETE DBVOL A? Will it use the whole
12gb of B? Or just the original 9gb?
Is the question whether you can use the Linux or Windows client to back up
the same file system into the same file space on the TSM server? That is,
the view of \\machname\d$ will remain consistent regardless of whether you
back up from Linux or Windows? If so, I would say "no". We certainly
ha
OK.
So You need driver for ext2 for windows (which is probably better
solution) or mount ntfs filesystem under linux (which isn't best). In
both case You lost permision to other filesystem, You must mount other
filesystem etc.
Maybe better is setup 'dsmc inc' on bootup?
On 2/27/07, Ibán Bernald
Leigh Reed wrote:
Patrick
You don't mention your version of TSM server or h/w platform and this is
a fairly old APAR but I thought I'd mention it.
TSM server 5.3.4.x on Intel (Dell 2950) hardware.
APAR IC47731 deals with poor performance on Linux kernel 2.6 on
zSeries.
Did see that APAR
Patrick
You don't mention your version of TSM server or h/w platform and this is
a fairly old APAR but I thought I'd mention it.
APAR IC47731 deals with poor performance on Linux kernel 2.6 on
zSeries.
Leigh
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi Wojtek:
I know that TSM is for both !!
Have you tried to backup the same filesystems mounted on linux or on
windows on the same physical machine ¿?
Think about a laptop that has 2 differents OS: linux /windows. The data
is stored in a FS that is mounted on /home, but when the machine is
What funcionality You expecting? TSM clients is for both SO.
On 2/26/07, Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi World,
Have anyone try to do a backup of a dual boot machine platform (windows
linux) that share the same FS using proxynode option ¿? is it possible
¿? is ther
Mark Scott wrote:
Morning all
Does anyone have any experiences good or bad running
Linux as a TSM Server? We are a reasonable size environment currently
running AIX as our server and Linux/Windows and Aix clients.
The question has been asked for various reasons to ch
Hi,
I would just setup the new diskpools in your ITSM servers, update the
copy groups to back-up to the new pools, update the old diskpools
pointing your next stg to the new diskpool and start migration.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Add the new disk volumes from the Hitachi unit to the existing disk pools.
Set all the volumes in the IBM unit to readonly.
Perform MOVE DATA commands on each volume in the IBM unit.
When the IBM volumes are all empty, run DELETE VOLUME on each one of them.
Voila! No need to create new stgpools.
We have two TSM servers on AIX, both at 5.3.4.1.
We have six disk pools on one server containing 2 1/2 TB data, and
seven on the other containing 6 1/2 TB data.
We need to migrate the disk pools to new disk media, and retire the
old media.
The current disk pools are on IBM 4300 SATA. The new di
Mark,
if you decide on Linux, make sure you have plenty of RAM and set
vm.swappiness=0, else TSM will be swapped out to disk and performance
will really suffer. BTW, TSM on the IBM OpenPower really rocks. the
biggest issue with Linux is support, mainly the lack of it.
our environment is;
One Ope
Do you run your Linux TSM servers on pseries (power4 or power5) or on intel
boxes.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lehmann,
Stefan
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM and Linux
Hello M
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Carpenter, Curtis wrote:
Ok. But should I have expected the tapes in the old pool to expire?
No. A copy storage pool is a "commitment": its contents persist as
long as the primary pool files exist. To get rid of an old copy
storage pool, perform DELete Volume on
Ok. But should I have expected the tapes in the old pool to expire?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: February 27, 2007 7:49 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Verifying data exists in new Copy Pool
Curtis -
The simple answer is that if you perform a Backup Stgpool to your new
copy storage pool, and it runs to completion without errors, then all
desired data is there - no issues.
You can use the COPied=Yes specification of Query CONtent to verify
that a given primary tape is "mirrored".
Hi,
TSM 5.3
I am doing a selective backup like this:
dsmc selective /data/XX/ -optfile=/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmnotdp.opt
-subdir=yes
but some of the "directories" under /data/XX are mounted file systems and
they do not get backed up.
This is the documented behaviour of the -subdir opt
Hello All. Need some help here. Our Gen_Tape pool currently uses
Jaguar tapes and Gen_Tape would normally backup to Gen_Offsite which
used 3590 tapes. I recently created a new Gen_Offsite copy pool that
uses Jaguar tapes and renamed the old Gen_Offsite copy pool that used
the 3590 tapes to Gen_O
Somewhat related:
Be cautious about choosing IBM's xSeries computers as the basis for
your Linux system: We have encountered a high defect rate with these
boxes (various models), and less than stellar IBM CE support when
they do break.
Richard Sims
Hello Mark,
we are currently using both - Linux and AIX as TSM-Server Platform
(5.3.4.2) . There is no difference in stability,
both are running well.
But handling disk storage (eg database volumes or diskpool volumes)
running with aix is a lot easier.
LVM coming with AIX is quite easier to
22 matches
Mail list logo
