That should NOT cause a 12, because its WAD.
What is in the dsmerror.log on the client?
There should be something else causing that 12...
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Wed 2/14/2007 5:09 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Ano
I was wondering if anyone knows if this would cause a failed 12 report.
Makes sense to me that it would NOT, but my common sense gets the best
of me most of the time. This file is larger than the disk pool allows
and needs to go to tape, which reports happened, but I just don't see
how that would c
I get this imformation from domdsm.log
the installation of tdp for domino will tell you where this is.
whilst it is not 100% and subject to normal 'hit and miss', it is better
than nothing.
I have found that I get info about backups starting and no info about
totals etc if
it is a long running pr
Another one of the problems I have with TSM is this issue. At the time I
had the same issue as you Wira. I went through a lengthy test trace with
IBM a few years ago and found that was the only way to get a list of
tapes the system needed for the restore. As I recall the list seemed to
be in order
You have to decide on the implication on production of this, but
something I vaguely remember doing once...
- perform the volume usage command
- Set all the applicable tapes to "unavailable" (temporarily)
- Perform the restore, expecting failures
- Search the actlog for the mount errors and com
Hi Rebert,
Thanks you very much for your recommendation. But it still not convenient
to me. Because I have more 50 volumes which related to the restoration node.
Some time more than 30 volumes are put out of library. It's not comfortable
to checkin all volumes of that node for restore which actua
Try searching the ADSM-L archives for terms like "current_timestamp". Here
is one entry that might be helpful:
http://adsm.org/lists/html/ADSM-L/2005-01/msg00511.html
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tu
It was that that the storage pool exceeed the number of available
volumes. I didnt see that message till now
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Stapleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: Message ANR1163W during Copy Storage Pool Recamat
There is a much easier way to do this.
Assuming you've got TSM accounting turned on at the server, look for the
dsmaccnt.log (c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\server1 on a Windows box,
/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin on an AIX box). This is a comma-delimited file
broken down by date, time, and node nam
-Zoltan Forray wrote: -
>What are the factors that determine if a file/filesystem is "new" vs
>"already there - this is just a new backup".
>
>Given the following scenario:
>
>1. Box "A" has existing backups.
>2. Create a clone of box "A" - call it "B" . "B" is identical in
>*EVERY* way a
Hi Andy!
No, the log isn't showing more detail.
Together with support, I have identified the tapes on which the backup
resides. I'm currently running an audit on these tapes. Let's wait for
the results...
Thanks for now!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message
Abulifia,
Something like : "where cast((current_timestamp- end_time )hours as
decimal) <= 24" should do the trick ...
However, if I remember properly, TDP's activity is not reported properly
in summary table ... Double check before trusting your query !
Cheers.
Arnaud
***
...or when you have tapes in the primary pool that are in an "unavailable"
access state. (This is what I usually find.)
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior consultant
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wed 2/14/2007 9
I usually get those when reclamation is canceled or there is a problem
getting to the primary backup tape (operators asleep at the wheel - tape
not in library).
Tim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
02/14/2007 10:53 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
T
Receive this messsage during copy storage pool reclamation.
ANR1163W Offsite volume A02096 still contains files which could not be
moved.
It displays for 19 different tapes.
How can this be resolved so I can reclaim these tapes.
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 So
What are the factors that determine if a file/filesystem is "new" vs
"already there - this is just a new backup".
Given the following scenario:
1. Box "A" has existing backups.
2. Create a clone of box "A" - call it "B" . "B" is identical in *EVERY*
way as far as the filesystem/OS is concerned
Thanks. That worked.
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
* e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( Phone: (713)670-2443
7Fax: (713)670-2457
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:43 PM
To: AD
I don't even bother with manual spreadsheet; I do scribble on small
yellow pad once a year. We've gone from 'node-level' licensing that made
no sense -- an SP-frame is a node, with up to 32 CPUs in 16 boxes under
ADSM 2.x (needs 16 node registrations at the server); to node-level
where a box is a n
I was a little surprised at Steve's cautious response to my
post. Looking over it I think I understand it now, and it makes me
want to emphasize that I'm not advocating just ignoring the issue
("Don't worry about it too much"). Focus on the "too much", not the
"don't worry". :)
If you develop a m
Hi everybody,
The last time when I posted a question I received a few very useful and quick
replies. Thx for that. Hopefully this question is also easy for a few of you to
answer.
Case:
A client want's to know how big the daily backup is for a Lotus client
backedp up via TDP.
I c
On Feb 14, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Douglas Currell wrote:
BTW. What is a "managed processor"?
Douglas -
Search on that term at www.ibm.com, which turns up various
announcements (206-037 is one), wherein there is a small glossary of
the IBM sales terminology. Such definitions should give you a sen
>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:22:28 +1000, Steven Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'm not so sure about this. One of our customers took a rather cavalier
> attitude to TSM licencing, and were using about 3 times as many licences
> as they'd paid for. IBM via PriceWaterhouseCoopers came in one da
Wira -
There is no way to determine what volumes will be needed for a
restoral before starting the restoral. (See "Restoral preview" in
ADSM QuickFacts".)
TSM is an "enterprise" software product, where commensurate hardware
resources are expected to be in place, which includes a library with
al
Steve,
I agree with you. I will take this comment back to the
packaging team and try to get this resolved in the future.
I am sorry for the problems this caused you.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 02/13/2007
10:03:36 PM:
>
Need some help understanding aboyt TSM 5.3 licensing. Thanks...
We run TSM 5.2.2 on Linux (Suse) with one dual drive tape library and our
licensing looks like this:
(lines containing "0" edited out)
Last License Audit: 02/14/2007 04:08:08 AM
Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery
Thanks for all the reply.
I didn't have added the DB to the Recovery Group.
When I did, it work.
Regards
Bo
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Del Hoobler
Sendt: 13. februar 2007 15:03
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: [ADSM-L]
Hi Wira
Maybe this script will help you:
select node_name , volume_name, stgpool_name, filespace_name from volumeusage
where node_name=upper('$1')
Say you name it: Restore_vol
Run restore_vol nodename
Regards
Robert Ouzen
Haifa University
Israel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist S
Hi,
I used TSM for long time. Until now I'm still feel bad every time
when I have to restore data especially when restore data from API (TDP
for oracle and backup image). The restore data size is very huge so they
need more than one volume to restore. Unfortunable I cannot maintain all
backup vo
28 matches
Mail list logo
