Hi all,
I tried to access the web client and receive this error when I tried to
click on any of the button (BACKUP, RESTORE):
“ANS2600S Browser trying to establish connection to client; received
socket exception: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect”
I have opened port
Hi Steven,
Your suggestion is to use nametype FSID to delete the specify
filespace. Would you please tell me the placing of '1' behind OMRON, is
this the way to say FSID =1 ?
delete filespace OMRON 1 nametype=fsid
Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blv
If you perform the Delete Filespace from the client side, you can
simply select the filespace from the presented list, and not have to
deal with the TSM server's impression of the name.
Richard Sims
Hi Avy,
While the filespace name is \\Eomron\e$, not \\mro1\e$ as you have
specified, I have had trouble in the past with this and the fix is to
use the FSID to identify which filespace to delete.
In a previous post you showed
Node Name: OMRON
http://moodys.com/moodys/cust/careers/getJobDetail.asp?docid=B58E9DC9425
41E34852572420067A8E0
Let me know if any interest.
Arthur
-
The information contained in this e-mail message, and any
attachment thereto, is confidential and may not be disclosed
witho
John,
For IBM drives you do not use the TSM drivers, but rather the base IBM
drivers you allude to. So continue to use those. This is true for any
manufacturer's library that has IBM drives in it. Another very
important point is to make sure and use the install.exe within the IBM
driver package
My understanding is, you are supposed to use the IBM atdd drivers with IBM
LTO drives. But you must use the TSM supplied tsmtape drivers with brand-X
LTO drives. This may apply to other tape technologies as well, DLT for
example. I have IBM LTO2 and LTO3 drives, and use the atdd drivers. At
our
Greetings,
Quick compatibility question I haven't seen discussed. If it has
and I missed it, I am sorry.
My preference with IBM tape libraries and LTO drives on a TSM server
is to use the IBMtape drivers, not the TSM drivers. In fact, I wonder why
Tivoli even has a special d
Actually this isn't really true,
The process address space on any 32-bit operating system (Windows or not)
is limited for 4 gigabytes for
obvious reasons, and the amount of usable virtual memory depends on the
specific platform (for Windows
it is 2 gig, on some Unix platforms it is as little as 1
I've said this before, but I'll repeat. Based on painful experience, it
makes a HUGE difference getting TSM to backup a Windows fileserver with
6TB and millions of files located on 2 monster volumes versus getting it
to backup the same amount of data spread across 6 or 8 (merely) large
volumes. J
Hello,
Can anyone tell me why so?
OMRON is current backing up the following(see below). I would like to take
\\mro1\e$ out of OMRON 's filespace so that it does not need to back it up
anymore. Instead I am making MRO to backup \\mro1\e$, its E drive
separately.
I have specify in the dsm.opt file
Is anyone out there doing this? :-) Thanks!
God bless you!!!
Chip Bell
Network Engineer I
IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional
Baptist Health System
Birmingham, AL
-
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email
On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Richard Sims wrote:
Tim -
Have you tried a combination of -TCPServeraddress and -
VIRTUALNodename and -PASsword?
Richard Sims
Richard thanks
In order to get this to work I would probably have to give
the client who is doing the restor
Richard Sims wrote:
Tim -
Have you tried a combination of -TCPServeraddress and -
VIRTUALNodename and -PASsword?
Richard Sims
Richard thanks
In order to get this to work I would probably have to give
the client who is doing the restore a TSM ID and PASsword
correct?
Tim
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bos, Karel
>I partly agree with the OS statement. Partly because I find it
difficult
>to explain why an OS is able to contain one disk with +6 million files
>but the back-up application isn't able to get the back-up stable
>(journ
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 16:16 +0100, Alexander Verkooijen wrote:
> According to the manual this is the meaning
> of return code 4:
>
>
> The operation completed successfully, but some files were
> not processed. There were no other errors or warnings.
> This return code is ve
Hi,
I partly agree with the OS statement. Partly because I find it difficult
to explain why an OS is able to contain one disk with +6 million files
but the back-up application isn't able to get the back-up stable
(journaling) or working at all (normal incremental) without using time
consuming opti
Hi,
And what is the (dsm)error.log of this client telling you?
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Wheeler
Sent: dinsdag 12 december 2006 15:40
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANR2579E backup "fails"
Every nigh
According to the manual this is the meaning
of return code 4:
The operation completed successfully, but some files were
not processed. There were no other errors or warnings.
This return code is very common. Files are not processed
for various reasons. The most common reas
A couple of other things to consider:
- Newer VTLs will have "data reduction" options to eliminate
duplicate data. Different vendors have different algorithms on doing
this. Some do it at the file level, others at the block level, or
other levels. TSM does not currently have any data reduction
Every night we have one machine which fails with return code 4, but I
cannot figure out why. Its the only machine that does this, and we have
several with the same configuration. The versions we're using are:
Server version 5.1.6
Client version 4.2.1
Here's the activity log entries for last nig
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Chvosta
>After that dbviewb reports that the journal state is 'not valid'. So we
>tried a further inremental backup (scheduled) to get a valid state of
>the journal database.
>This incremental was stopped with
>
>ANS1999E Inc
Hi,
Read the manual?
Q event * * begind=-1 endd=today begint=now endt=now ex=yes
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kerry Campbell
Sent: dinsdag 12 december 2006 15:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Hello All,
Hello All,
I am filling in as the TSM guy while we search for a new employee that
has this and other skills.This morning I received the message below
and am wondering what I would need to do from here. Thanks!
Server name: TSM1, platform: AIX-RS/6000, version: 5.3.2.0, date/time:
12/12
Yup, provoked me into an immediate uninstall of IE7. Actually, I have
used Firefox for web admin work for some time, which already supports
the tabs I like.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael S Irish
Sent: Tuesday, December 12,
>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:24:12 -0500, Orville Lantto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The killer feature of VTLs is data de-duplication, which is beginning to
> be available.
No, no! An elephant is like a snake! [1]
The killer feature of VTLs is that it permits underutilized tapes with
just a fe
We recently upgraded pc desktops to internet explorer 7.0. This mandated
update does not appear to be compatible with the TSM web based admin
interface currently in use. We are at TSM 5.2.3. When the command line is
opened and an admin command is entered there is no view available to show
results.
Add this to the dsm.opt file and run the incremental again:
*==*
* Reduce memory usage by processing a directory at a time (slower) *
*==*
memoryefficientbac
Hi all,
We'll try to backup a filespace of a fileserver (Windows Storage Server 2003
R2, Memory=2GB, Filespacedata: 650GB, 6.759.000 Files, complex directory
structure, TSM Client Level 5.3.4 - TSM Server Level 5.3.4.0) using journal
based backup. We set up the journal service and made a full incr
This was interesting, so I'll share it here,
The library is a Quantum M1500, 2 frames stacked, with 4 Quantum LTO3
drives that show in windows as HP LTO 3.
To update the firmware to solve our errors during reclaim/move data I
first tried HP LTO3 firmware. The drives reported they were version G26
30 matches
Mail list logo
