Re: Using tsm-encryption and want to change the hostname at the Client

2006-07-31 Thread Rainer Wolf
Alexei, thanks a lot for your detailled explanation ! It's clearer to me now :-) ... just only two more questions ? What about the windows-Clients - do I then (when changing the windows system-name) also have to manually remove the equivalent 'TSM.PWD' entry in the registry or elsewhere ? if s

Re: Using tsm-encryption and want to change the hostname at the Client

2006-07-31 Thread Alexei Kojenov
Rainer, Your data is always encrypted with the key generated from the password that you enter, regardless of the hostname. The hostname is only used to store the password locally. For example, 1) Let's say the hostname is 'mercury' 2) You run your first backup and are prompted for encryption key

Re: ACSLS ejects not working... help!

2006-07-31 Thread Sung Y Lee
This could be just normal process. Sometimes when all TSM drives are all in use or mounted, move media command will fail. Even you tell not to check label, when label is not readable, it will still need to mount the tape into the drive for processing. Thanks, Sung Y. Lee "ADSM: Dist Stor Man

Re: 3592 tape read performance

2006-07-31 Thread Kauffman, Tom
There *is* a way to get TSM to stop data movement mid-file. It's ugly. And I've had to use it in similar circumstances. Halt the TSM server. I still don't understand *why* we can't get a cancel process with force option. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor M

Re: 3592 tape read performance

2006-07-31 Thread Thomas Denier
-"Survoy, Bernard J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - >Sounds like you have an issue on some volumes with the VCR (volume >control region). This structure is used (among other things) to >support high speed search operations. If the VCR is invalid or >damaged, the drive will go into a low spe

Re: audito data missing

2006-07-31 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Look up the reference info for the QUERY AUDITOCCUPANCY command, either in the Admin Reference or by running "HELP QUERY AUDITOCCUPANCY" from the admin CLI. Therein lies your answer. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: An

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Yep. Used tapeutil to get their serial # and such. "Barnes, Kenny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 07/31/2006 01:41 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Configuring new 3592-E05 drives Can you talk to th

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
I figured it out. Found an old document that says for "mixed media" in a 3494, you have to define the library, multiple times pointing to the same library. In this case, we have already been using 3590K tapes. So I defined a second library and all seems to be working.. Thanks for all

Re: audito data missing

2006-07-31 Thread Sean English
Try running an audit license again and see if the data appears. If I remember correctly, the amount of data that is reported in the q audito command, directly ties in with the audit license command. Meaning, the TSM server has to audit all its client information before it will report to the q aud

audito data missing

2006-07-31 Thread Keith Arbogast
A customer ran a backup from the command line of the files in one directory on a Windows 2003 node on Friday. When he runs q backup "C:\\*" TSM returns a list of file descriptions and sizes. About 10 Gb in all, mostly .iso files. Today, when I run 'q audito *' from the TSM server, the node is

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Yes. Just installed them last week. Yes, I did reboot the server(s). "LeBlanc, Patricia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 07/31/2006 01:39 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Nast, Jeff P.
Make sure that you have the "Mount Limit" set correctly in your 3592 device class... 3592-E05 is not a WORM drive... -Jeff -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:36 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIS

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Barnes, Kenny
Can you talk to the drives using the IBMtape utilities from the OS? i.e. You should be open the drive as a device and read the SN of the drive. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:36 PM

Re: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread LeBlanc, Patricia
Are you using the most up to date drivers? Atape and atldd?? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:36 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Configuring new 3592-E05 drives We finally got o

Configuring new 3592-E05 drives

2006-07-31 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
We finally got our 3592-E05 drives installed and attached to the SAN in our 3494 library. Now I am trying to figure out how to get them to work ! Is there something special about configuring TSM to use them ? The server is 5.3.2.3 on AIX. I did the cfgmgr and the smitty devices to define them

Re: Reclamation processing behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Thorneycroft, Doug
Thanks, I figured that it was normal, I was just curious as to why. It didn't make sense that it was the VTL, Since Tivoli sees it as a tape library. I should have guessed, since the only difference in the new storagpools is that now I have a next storage pool. -Original Message- From: A

Re: Reclamation processing behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Johnson, Milton
This is normal behavior when reclaiming a storage pool that has a NEXT STGPOOL defined. I became aware to it when I upgraded to 5.3, I also have a VTL. However, being a VTL has nothing to do with it, it's having a NEXT STGPOOL defined that elicits this behavior. If you use the reclaim stg comman

Fw: audito report: real or compressed?

2006-07-31 Thread Nicholas Cassimatis
Keith, It's the total of data as the data was sent by the client. If the client compressed the data, then it's the compressed size, otherwise, it's the full/uncompressed size, regardless of where it resides in the TSM Server storagepools. Nick Cassimatis - Forwarded by Nicholas Cassimatis/R

audito report: real or compressed?

2006-07-31 Thread Keith Arbogast
Does the auditoccupancy report show megabytes used after files have been compressed on being migrated to tape or before? In other words, the total of primary backup media used, or the total of the original files on the node? Or, is it the sum of uncompressed storage on disk pools and compressed

ACSLS ejects not working... help!

2006-07-31 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone, I have TSM 5.2.7.1 on AIX 5.3 and I also have an STK SL8500 with IBM LTO2 tapes/drives. I'm just doing a move media and trying to eject all of our NAS NDMP backup tapes. As you can see it is failing. My main question is: Is this a TSM server issue or a library issue? I have bee

Re: TSM Blocks Device Files in HP-UX after using it...

2006-07-31 Thread Robin Sharpe
Hi Bernaldo, We also run TSM on HP-UX. I don't recall ever seeing that exact message, but my guess is you either have a hardware problem with those two devices (or something along the path to those devices... are they on the same FC adapter or SCSI bus?), -- OR -- HP-UX has renumbered t

TSM && OnDemand Content Manager

2006-07-31 Thread Bernaldo de Quiros, Iban 1
Hi all !! Did anyone has a TSM && OnDemand Content Manager implementation guide ¿? Or could someone explain me the main configuration to make OnDemand work with TSM ¿? Thanks In Advance, Regards, Ibán.

TSM Blocks Device Files in HP-UX after using it...

2006-07-31 Thread Bernaldo de Quiros, Iban 1
Hi Everyone !! Did anyone got this error on TSM ¿? any information or GOTCHA's ¿? 07/28/06 12:54:47 ANRD mmsext.c(1360): ThreadId<70> Unable to obtain model type for '/dev/rmt/25m', rc = 30 Callchain follows: 00d18e6f outDiag

Re: 3592 tape read performance

2006-07-31 Thread Rainer Wolf
Hi Thomas, 3592-J1a, tsmserver 5.3.3.2 on Solaris10 we have the same thing happened - also removed 2 or 3 tapes from the library. It was really annoying because a tape may happen to be reading 24 hours constantly reading but with some kBytes per second. In our case it seems to be possibly both ou