- Original Message -
From: "Bob Booth - UIUC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone backing up Mirapoint with TSM?
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:29:27PM -0500, fred johanson wrote:
> > We've discussed it, but they're not yet NDMP compliant, so t
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "holyrule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "monasticlife"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "MDL"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "rcbenedictineoblate"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "oblateforum-l"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:15 AM
Subject: [Monast
Many people are using VTL's (Virtual Tape Libraries). IBM has the TS7510 and
EMC has the CDL. There are also many people using large disk subsystems like
the IBM DS4300 or DS6800 or the EMC Clarion or Symmetric. Then on this disk
subsystems they use TSM's file device class.
In the end us
Paul,
If the tsm clients are running under linux, you could use CBQ (Class
Based Queueing) to perform traffic shapping on the output traffic of
the nic. This works pretty well.
Google for CBQ Linux. .
On 4/25/06, Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems that every action has some re-a
> Seems that every action has some re-action.
Sounds like Raibeck's Rule #37: "There is no free lunch" :-)
Regard,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Richard, et al,
I thought the default RESOURCEUTIL was also the minimal value, so I
don't think we could lower that any more than it already is. Using
MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP is a good idea, as is using 'nice' to deprioritize.
We have actually been working hard to improve TSM performance s
Oh yeah, forgot to ask... can you reproduce the hang when trying to launch
ntbackup?
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web p
Hi Wanda, which SP are you running, and on what processor architecture?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support we
Is anyone using client-based encryption with LANFREE backup ?
Robert Moulton wrote, on 04/21/06 13:52:
> A couple of questions about lanfree backup:
>
> Does the standard client option 'include.encrypt' work?
> How about the API option 'enableclientencryptkey'?
>
> Server is TSM 5.3.3
>
> All feed
Windows 2003, Exchange 2003, 4-node cluster, 3 active 1 passive.
BAclient 5.3.2.2.
TDP For Exchange NOT installed yet.
Have installed the Windows baclient, trying to get a backup of the C: drive and
system state before we start installing the TDP for Exchange and all the
appropriate schedulers.
Hi
I am using that kind of setup in my LAB Its a Library with the
type=file, the tapes are files of 5GB that is on one disk and I have
another disk for my COPYPOOL (offsite) with tapes that are also files of
5BG..
Its working very good
Luc Beaudoin
Network Administrator/SAN/TSM
Hopital Gene
Marc Crombeen wrote:
> Anyone have an idea of how to use a disk pool to do reclamation for tape
> storage instead of using 2 tape drives?
I would have guessed this is very common configuration. You setup
reclaim storage pool (e.g. 'define stgp diskreclaim filedev
maxscratch=10 nextpool=tapepool')
Hello Everyone
I have a question. I would like to make a disk onsite_tapepool with a
bunch of space I just inherited from a fastt. It would be a poor man's
virtual tape library. One of my concerns is well of course is this
possible, and second how would it create copies for offsite. Has an
Assuming your drpool is tape based (and not remote disk), then you'll
always use at least one tape drive, but more often two will be used. If
you've got enough diskcache then some of the data being reclaimed will
still reside there, so it will only mount the one tape necessary for
writing. Once y
Turn on client-side compression so you monopolize their cpu instead?
Sorry, couldn't resist. You have a problem some of us wish we had.
Usually the filesystem scanning takes long enough that it creates pauses
in the use of the nic (at least here). You might be able to
intentionally hobble tsm's n
Anyone have an idea of how to use a disk pool to do reclamation for tape
storage instead of using 2 tape drives?
Thanks
Marc
DISCLAIMER:
If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission, you are hereby
notified that
any disclosure or other action taken in reliance on its contents i
Was wondering if anybody out there has implemented TSM using a tapeless
system? This is something we are considering.
Any insight would be appreciated.
We currently are using TSM version 5.2.2.0 on a Window 2003 server. Using
a STK 9710 tape library.
Thanks,
Bruce A. Edelen
Ashland Inc. - E
Paul -
Certainly, "de-tuning" the TSM backups will reduce the impact, where
the most obvious tactic is to minimize RESOURceutilization. And you
can get more drastic via MEMORYEFficientbackup Yes. Depending upon
the file population, the influx of the Active files list at the
beginning of an increm
Jeremy - A frequently asked question...many past postings.
The TSM Problem Determination Guide has a section titled
"Troubleshooting the client scheduler", which leads you through steps.
Always keep in mind that the scheduler is serial: thus, if the
previously scheduled event has not completed f
We have a small number of users here who are complaining that when a
TSM backup runs on their client system, it monopolizes use of their
network card. They are looking for a way to throttle back TSM's use
of the network. Has anyone else run into this? Any ideas? The only
thing I've come up wit
All,
I am running 3.4 on the VM mainframe . I dont know if that will be the
issue here, but.
I have multiple machines missing thier scheduled times , for no
reason, they are associated with a schedule, they have a management class,
everything , but they dont kick off or do anything. # hou
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:29:27PM -0500, fred johanson wrote:
> We've discussed it, but they're not yet NDMP compliant, so that approach is
> on hold. The current possibility is to flashcopy MIRAPOINT to a LINUX
> system and then pcik that up with TSM. Still all highly theoretical.
>
>
>
> At 12
We've discussed it, but they're not yet NDMP compliant, so that approach is
on hold. The current possibility is to flashcopy MIRAPOINT to a LINUX
system and then pcik that up with TSM. Still all highly theoretical.
At 12:30 PM 4/25/2006 -0400, you wrote:
I'm looking for someone who is backin
Are you using the TSM device driver for the library changer and the IBM
Ultrium device drivers for the tape drives? If you've already done that,
then you need to supply more information like how you did the define drive
and define path commands and what type of errors you are seeing.
___
Mario,
Google and the IBM FTP site both have info.
Here's the last release of the Tru64 client:
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v5r1/Tru64UNIX/v517
This client is no longer under development.
From what I understand, you'll still get howto/usage su
Incrementals and Images are not the same type of objects insite TSM.
I don't see anything in the docs that indicate whether rebinding can occur
for image backups.
If rebinding an image snapshot is possible, it will only happen when you
take a new snapshot.
-Josh
On 06.04.05 at 09:44 [EMAIL PRO
I'm looking for someone who is backing up a Mirapoint e-mail system
with TSM, so I can ask them a few questions.
Thanks.
..Paul
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757
Manager, Storage Systems Fx: 607-255-8521
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: [
Has anyone worked with the IBM 4560 Library? I have an Overland Fibre
Card in it and am trying to get and LTO1 drive and an LTO2 drive to
work. I see everything fine in Windows 2003 server Device Manager but
TSM doesn see the LTO1 drive.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Marc
DISCLAIMER:
If y
Matt,
I didn't see further replies to this so I thought I'd add my experience
recently.
I have two servers I've been chasing locks/hangs on, mostly related to
REPAIR STGVOL.
One server would hang up every other day.
I waited for a month to get a patch, which was against 5.3.2.4; however,
in has
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the info. My db is 25gb and log is 4gb. Log mode is normal.
ray
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
Hi Ray!
I think we all have seen this before.
What's the size of your recovery log?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original
Here is what you would do if you wanted to backup up the images themselves with
tivoli.. you will have to add a virtual path to the dsm.opt file to see where
is this going
vmware-cmd /root/vmware/winNetStandard/securID.vmx addredo scsi0:0
cd /vmfs/Local-Vmfs
cp securID.vmdk securID.vmdk.bak
v
Ray - As Eric says, has been seen a lot.
(See the List archives for past postings on Recovery Log
problems.)
See IBM Technote 1198224 for handling.
Richard Sims
Did he install the API before the BA? It has to be installed first.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/25/2006 9:40:28 AM >>>
Hi *SM-ers!
One of my Unix colleagues is trying to install the TSM 5.3.3.0 client
on
a SLES9 distribution.
I downloaded the client from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/t
Vmbk.pl is the correct search. Here's the site: http://www.vmts.net/vmbk.htm
Bill Boyer
"Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salak Juraj
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:3
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:18:32 -0500, -ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've seen a condition a few times where the TSM log will fill and the
> server will crash. See the console log below. Has anyone seen this
> before? Any ideas? TSM server 5.3.2.0 on AIX 5.3.
Yep, that's par for the cour
Perhaps you are missing the client's api which need to be installed with every
client.
You can download the client's api from IBM ftp like the client.
Regards,
Ibán.
-Mensaje original-
De: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Loon, E.J.
van - SPLXM
Enviado el:
Hi Ray!
I think we all have seen this before.
What's the size of your recovery log?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-ray
Sent: dinsdag 25 april 2006 16:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.
All,
I've seen a condition a few times where the TSM log will fill and the
server will crash. See the console log below. Has anyone seen this
before? Any ideas? TSM server 5.3.2.0 on AIX 5.3.
Thanks,
ray
ANR2997W The server log is 81 percent full. The server will delay
transactions
by 3 m
Thanks for your input.
Just an FYI:
The file systems mentioned in the log as corrupt, are corrupt.
Should have trusted TSM in the first place.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 9:12 AM
T
Hi *SM-ers!
One of my Unix colleagues is trying to install the TSM 5.3.3.0 client on
a SLES9 distribution.
I downloaded the client from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintena
nce/client/v5r3/Linux/Linux86/v533/ and I delivered him the two packages
TIVsm-API.i386.rp
During an ASR restore with TSM, I press F6 to be able to load
the appropiate disk device drivers from diskette and I get this
error.
File txtsetup.oem caused an unexpected error (4096) at line 1896 in
d:\srvrtm\base\boot\setup\oemdisk.c
Any ideas
Tim Brown
Systems Specialist
Central Hudson Gas
Nancy,
performing Google vmbkup.pl
returns exactly your response (below) :-)))
Juraj
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von Meadows, Andrew
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. April 2006 21:34
> An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Betreff: Re
Kurt
Thanks again!
regards,
Tim
Kurt Beyers wrote:
> Thimoty,
>
> The 'wait=yes' is required to make sure that the process is started in the
> foreground. If it is started in the background, the processes will be started
> in parallel even with the SERIAL parameter in the script. I found this
43 matches
Mail list logo
