UNDOCUMENTED OPTIONS FOR EXPIRE INVENTORY:
There are two undocumented/unsupported options for EXPIRE INV;
BEGINNODEID and ENDNODEID.
These accept the decimal node number of a node and can be used to
expire a specific node's filespaces, or a specific range.
WHY WOULD YOU EVER WANT TO USE THESE?
Hi all,
I have a tape in TSM library which initially meant for export node
purpose.This volume is not being defined into any storage pool.
However when I issue q volume; I couldn't trace the volume but found in q
volhistory entry.
Date/Time: 03/11/06 10:39:07
Volume Type: STGNEW
B
There are many factors that would decide this. One of them woula be the hosting
environment. In ours, we have a 3584 library with lto Gen 1 drives and they are
cleaned about every TB of data, roughly.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thu A
Have you looked at virtual mount points and also journaling?
I have a few systems with 5 million each acking up to my TSM Server and
I have never had an issue with a limit.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gaurav Marwaha
Sent: Thurs
Our 3494 lib with 3590H drives get cleaned about twice a day each. The new
3584
has 3592 drives . . . we're not sure what to expect for cleaning frequency.
Rick
Jim Zajkowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
U>
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Richard Rhodes wrote:
Is there a way to tell from AIX the number of cleaning cycles remaining in
a 3584?
We ended up using TSM-managed, ASNEEDED cleaning, so that it could monitor
our tapes.
The web interface shows that there are 10 tapes, each with 50 cycles
available -
FYI
My preference is the p-series for AIX it does more work and very
flexible for TSM,
I would use the p 570 and use LPARS for the TSM Library Manger if I had the
choice of machine to deploy for TSM.
As I am running currently in our TSM server farm of 3 P-series machines (p
630, 6H1, and an o
Hi,
Problem:
We have a huge file system with about 30 to 50 million files to be
backed up, the incremental backup does the job, but takes too long to
complete, out of these 50 million files, only 2 or so actually change. So
the scanning runs sometimes into 24 hour window and the next
Hi all ..
I try to launch the tutorials in the Getting Started... and I got only a
little picture in the top left ... ay idea why
thanks
Luc Beaudoin
Administrateur Réseau / Network Administrator
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254
First, if the volume has data on it, TSM won't allow you to change the
status from Private to Scratch. For the "q content Vol_name" test you are
doing, if you want to continue doing it, you can do a "q content Vol_name
count=1" which will give you the first object only - this should have a
very qu
Allow me to spin the question ever so slightly:
PC Server Hardware (like Dells) --OR-- IBM p-Series Hardware?
We are in the planning phases of a TSM rollout and our consultant is
pushing us towards the p-Series line (somewhere in the neighborhood of a
550). We are deploying in a pretty large envi
You have to cancel the process or session that is using that tape before
you can dismount it. You can only dismount a tape whose status is IDLE.
Since that tape is mounted read-only and it is waiting for a second tape
to be mounted, a reclamation or move data process is probably running.
Try:
We are experiencing a long wait when do q content volume_name. IS that normal
...at times it will take over 2 hours ? what we want to do is check if the
volume has data in it if it has no data and marked Private status then we want
to change its status=Scratch but not if it has data in it and it
I'm getting a pthread error while setting up new clients on a new TSM
server. I get one message per new node, as the client is configured.
Has anyone else seen this? Is it a fatal error?
Clients are typically b/a client 5.3.3.0 on W2003, sp1.
Server is TSM 5.3.3.0 on AIX 5300-01 (64bit)
NR0405I S
Hi,
I´m having a problem, almost everyday, when I execute q mount
command, I receive something like that:
ANR8330I DLT volume DYI514 is mounted R/O in drive MT-SCSI-ID-3 (/dev/rmt/3mt),
status: IN USE.
ANR8379I Mount point in device class DC-SUNL1000 is waiting for the volume
Are your LTO tapes still in FILLING status? They will show as a
percentage of estimated capacity until either they reach the FULL status
or they exceed the estimated capacity while in FILLING status. When in
FULL status, what you see is what you got.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/20/2006 2:46:05 PM >>
>I don't think I understand how inventory & audit works. When you do
Audit library 3584lib
>checkl=barcode should I see the robotics move and read each and every
tape slot and resysnc with
>TSM data base ? how do I get these back in sync
On a 3584, an "audit library 3584lib checkl=barcode" does NO
Hi,
Is there a way to tell from AIX the number of cleaning cycles remaining in
a 3584?
For our 3494 we have a script that does a "mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qL"
to get the number of cleaning cycles available. I'm trying to
find how to do this for our new 3584 lib. I found that the mtlib command
works
No misunderstanding at all. I know how it works. I see upwards of 100GB on
some of my K tapes but "NO LESS" than 40GB on any of the others.
All I did was "move" 20 servers what were getting the full 40GB compression
or better on a 3590 tape system to a LTO system. The data is the same, the
servers
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/20/2006
01:18:14 PM:
> The way the LTO2 drives seem to be working is that although the
compressions
> settings within TSM are the same, and the servers were just migrated
from
> one server to the other, if the tape were listed 20/40 it is only
storing 20
> ins
>
> It also makes no sense if estimated capacity is 400GB, and the
> drive is
> capable of supporting that, it only reports 200.
>Sure it does... The native capacity of LTO2 is 200 GB (plus or minus
>a tad, depending upon the actual length of the individual tape).
>Think of a tape as containing 20
All, We recently upgraded to Netware 6.5 Clustered servers and Tivoli Version
5.3.3 on a FAS. When backing up and restoring the volumes they show up as
truncated 8 character names. Has anyone had any experiance with this and could
help. Also, The files were being backed up correctly on the ol
On Apr 20, 2006, at 12:29 PM, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
Why it is LTO2 capacity reads differently than 3590's. My 3590's
report 40GB
when filling and "at least" 40GB when full. K tapes read 20/40 and
LTO2's
200/400. So why wouldn't it show at least 400?
Is this a TSM, LTO or some other issue cau
>> On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:50:56 -0700, "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
> If 10 nodes are in one group will it only mount one tape even if no other
> tape drives are busy?
Yes; one stream per collocgroup, just like you would get one stream
per node. (even if you're collocating by
Geoff --
How have you defined your device class?
Device Class Name: NIBLTO
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 26
Device Type: LTO
Format: DRIVE
Est/Max Capacity (MB):
Mount
You will experience slower client backups with ANY configuration that is
RAID5 for your disk storage pools. The reason is that client backup is
100% writes in the disk storage pools, and RAID5 is very slow at writes.
The throughput difference is significant - as much as 75% in our case.
After much
Hi,
One of our LTO 2 tapes, (and many like them).
HT0329COPYPOOL1HDLA02 469,125.6 88.6
Full
Seems to be a config issue in your config. Maybe the drive isn't
configured to write in compressed format? Maybe the clients are
configured to compress their data before
Why it is LTO2 capacity reads differently than 3590's. My 3590's report 40GB
when filling and "at least" 40GB when full. K tapes read 20/40 and LTO2's
200/400. So why wouldn't it show at least 400?
Is this a TSM, LTO or some other issue causing this?
Is a tape reporting 215GB when full really hol
Have an ADIC I2k with 4 fiber LTO2 drives running TSM in a Windows 2000
environment. How often should the tape drives be cleaned? Backup 50-60
GB nighly and that should be close to 80 plus in the near future.
Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633
Has anyone used the "usedirectory" option in the Windows client? I
cannot find any documentation on how to set this up, other than the
brief writeup of the "usedirectory" option in the TSM for Windows
Installation and Users Guide.
Thanks.
..paul
--
Paul ZarnowskiPh:
On Apr 20, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Norita binti Hassan wrote:
My DB is nearly 100% full . Can I use the REDUCE command to solve this
problem rather than extend the Db.
The REDuce DB command is not a weight loss program for the TSM
database, but rather a retraction of the amount of space it may
consu
Hi all,
My DB is nearly 100% full . Can I use the REDUCE command to solve this
problem rather than extend the Db.
Thanks
NORITA BINTI HASAN
Senior Programmer
Enterprise Systems Services
Information Communications Tech. Div
6th Floor,Pos Malaysia HQ
50670 Kuala Lumpur
* : 03 - 22756638
*: 016
Here's what I'm guessing is happening with your tape utilization
numbers, as I've seen that here too. Until the tape is actually full,
it seems to base it's %full on the "estimated capacity" of the device
class. So I'm thinking you probably set your lto2 dev class to 400GB.
Once the tape is full,
Not that it's very helpful for you, but I just rolled out lto3 drives
with maxell tapes, and those have been fine. I know this isn't likely,
but are any of the scsi controllers you're using raid capable? I've
heard of big problems with that. In the case of adaptec, their raid
cards often let you
I have a 2850 running 5.3.3 with 2 Qlogic HBA to a small EMC raid and a
midrange ADIC tape lib.
(4GB mem, 2 Xeon, running in 64bit mode)
so far it's working fine since our environment is pretty small.
Just scale accordingly. if you have the budget, go for the bigger boxes
since they usually come
As much as your budget allows.
Bob Martoncik
Lucas County Information Services
419-213-4633
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/19/2006 9:15 PM >>>
Since we have to test the Dell server with Linux OS for TSM server, I
have
listed questions.
What size of the Dell server's are folks deploying 6850 or 2850 ?
H
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 03:12:32PM -0700, Vats.Ashok wrote:
> I don't think I understand how inventory & audit works. When you do Audit
> library 3584lib checkl=barcode should I see the robotics move and read each
> and every tape slot and resysnc with TSM data base ? how do I get these back
>
Justin,
I don't think the model is the issue. The issue is, is the machine suitable for
your needs. For Intel based systems I would go for the following:
Intel Xeon 3.0 GHz or better (or equal AMD).
Min. 2GB internal memory (add another 1-2GB if you run ISC on the same system).
Depending on yo
38 matches
Mail list logo
