"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 01/13/2006
02:30:20 PM:
> Is a direct fiber attached library defined differently
> than a direct SCSI attached library?
No.
>
> Will the fiber attached have an address similar to a SCSI attached
(i.e..
> device=lb0.0.0.0)?
> ITSM Ver, 5.2.6 on Win2K platform
DEFINE PATH BACKUP 3590RMTX SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=DRIVE
LIBRARY=IBM3494X DEVIC
E=/dev/rmtx ONLINE=YES
the above is a sample on a fibre attached tape library device on aix
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/13/2006 3:30:20 PM >>>
Is a direct fiber attached library defined differently
than a direct SCSI a
Is a direct fiber attached library defined differently
than a direct SCSI attached library?
Will the fiber attached have an address similar to a SCSI attached (i.e..
device=lb0.0.0.0)?
ITSM Ver, 5.2.6 on Win2K platform.
Thanks,
Doug
Doug Thorneycroft
> Systems Analyst
> County Sanitation Dist
On Jan 13, 2006, at 2:07 PM, William Boyer wrote:
Looking at the text for that message:
Explanation: The server ends a file retrieval operation for the
specified
session because an internal database integrity error has been
encountered on
the server.
Sounds like this is a problem with the TSM
There's not really much tsm can do about this particular annoyance.
Groupwise just doesn't have an easy way to get at individual mail
accounts. There are some things under the groupwise folders that you
don't need, but it's only 5-10% of the total anyway, so you might as
well just do it all. If y
Looking at the text for that message:
Explanation: The server ends a file retrieval operation for the specified
session because an internal database integrity error has been encountered on
the server.
Sounds like this is a problem with the TSM database, not any indivual tape(s).
Bill Boyer
"Som
we did a 'query content vol damaged=yes' on all the volumes that hold the data
and did not find any damaged files. I alos did an audit vol xx fix=n ' on all
the volumes and they all ran successfully.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rajesh Oak" <[EMAIL
Boris,
This is my GUESS.
When reading the disk you take advantage of OS read-ahead caching so the
"backup" performance is limited by the output device or its communication
link. My LTO-1 drives will each swallow 20 MB/s or better depending upon
compressibility.
When "restoring" to the disk, esp
I am trying to restore some critical data and I keep on getting this error
message:
ANR0548W Retrieve or restore failed for session xxx for node processing
file space \\server\e$ 5 for file \mss\.xx stored as backup -data integrity
error detected
I did audit volume for the all the volu
Thanks Troy!
It's annoying having to restore an entire mailbox just for a few
pieces of deleted/lost mail. I will check into this way of doing
groupwise restores although it will require a "restore server"
that the client has to have. When we do restores for this Novell
client they have a separa
Just to follow up!
It is relatively annoying however, that you have to restore an entire
PO
just to get back a few deleted messages from one user's mailbox. Does
anyone have a better way to do this using TSM.
TSM
Novell 6.5
TSM client 5.2.2
Thanks for any Help!
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
We have a separate "restore server" that we put all of our groupwise
restores onto. Because groupwise makes you restore the whole P.O. just
to get at one person's email, it would be a bit cumbersome for us to do
it on the live servers. On the groupwise servers themselves, I run a
"dsmc set access
On Jan 12, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Vats.Ashok wrote:
We have a 1Gb NIC card connected to TSm server which is running
@80% of its capacity. Can we put another NIC card and configure AIX/
TSM to do traffic load balance ? How does TSM know about the two
cards ..is it supported configuration ?
Appreciat
We have 2 1GB Network Interface Cards configured for Cisco trunking. 1
IP on the network, the Cisco switch balances the incoming traffic based
on some parameters. I believe AIX simply chooses the less busy NIC for
outbound traffic. We peak in the 80% range on both cards.
Andy Huebner
-Origi
The output from 'query node' with 'f=d' includes a number of statistics for
the 'last session'. The same information is also available through the SQL
interface. We have a number of client nodes that used polling mode
scheduling. Each of these nodes connects to the server every three hours to
check
Greetings,
In any encryption solution you pick, key management is crucial. Who
is responsible to generate the keys? How often are they changed? Who
maintains a long-term archive of the keys so you can unencrypt data that was
encrypted years ago, if necessary? How are multiple, concurren
Hello,
I am having trouble restoring a Novell Post office box using
point-n-time,
A client wants a restore using a specific data but the file structure
doesn't
for that date. But when I do normal restore without point n time I see
the file structure. Does anyone have a specific way they restore
Geoff,
It is one thing to say that you need the TSM database in order to
reconstruct a file (in its correct format) on the client system. It's
another to say that the data can't be read at all. So yes, you could
possibly read the tape outside of TSM and obtain readable bits of
information, dependi
The current issue of STORAGE magazine (January 2006) has a large article
about encryption appliances.
http://storagemagazine.techtarget.com/
Rick
Richard Sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM:To
Richard,
Sorry, I also forgot to mention that this date problem is not the only
one : look at the output of my query and compare the number of
processes, and the amount of data transferred with the activity log !
Cheers.
Arnaud
*
Richard,
Thanks for your prompt answer !
At least I know where it comes from, but to tell you the truth, I'm
becoming seriously bored with TSM : a new interface no one wants to use,
then bugs in the simplest functions ...
I loved TSM, but the honeymoon is over and IBM is responsible for it ...
I
That's yet another problem with the Summary table. Woe unto those
who depend upon it.
Go to http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
IBMTivoliStorageManager.html and search on:
+START_TIME +1900
Richard Sims
Hi list,
Brand new TSM server 5.3.2.0 on AIX 5.3.
I manually started a migration from disk to tape, here's corresponding
activity log :
01/13/06 15:27:55 ANR2017I Administrator BAR021 issued command:
MIGRATE
STGPOOL diskpool_db2_logs lowmig=5 (SESSION:
60948)
Hey!
The daily report generated by TSM Operational Reports (5.2.2 TSM Server
5.2.2), began to see itself of the form that is more down (it would have to
be seen in Spanish). Somebody knows because it can be?
2006-01-12 10:08 ANR2121W Aviso: se han cambiado m猀 搀攀
䴀䈀 搀攀 氀愀 戀愀猀攀 搀攀 搀愀琀漀猀 礀 氀愀
>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:35:37 -0500, Jim Zajkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My question is, what should I do after I've either restored the
> machine or not had to? Should I move the data back to the tapes?
> Should I set a migration from PRESTAGE back to TAPEPOOL? I see that
> the tape tha
Hi Jim,
I believe that client-sided/initiated
encryption is your only 'native' option here - prior to TSM 5.3, the 56bit
DES encryption provided simply wasn't enough for some institutions, but
with TSM 5.3,128bit AES encryption for both BA client *and* API backups
(i.e. TDP's) has been brought in
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Murray, Jim wrote:
I would be more interested in the answer not so much as recovery of
data
but in securing data. Being a financial institution we have
regulatory
requirements for data protection, new State laws say I must encrypt
all
data on tape that is moved off
I would be more interested in the answer not so much as recovery of data
but in securing data. Being a financial institution we have regulatory
requirements for data protection, new State laws say I must encrypt all
data on tape that is moved off site.
Jim Murray
Senior Systems Engineer
Liberty
28 matches
Mail list logo
