This presentation will cover how journal based backup works with the TSM
Client. It includes troubleshooting techniques and solutions to common problems
seen with journaled backups and the journal database.
Monday, November 7, 10:00 AM CST
Presented by: Marc Lanteigne
Visit this website for con
Yup! Upgraded Wednesday and GUI went off immediately (TSM 5.3.1.2).
At 02:40 PM 11/4/2005 -0500, you wrote:
Hello,
We just upgraded from AIX 5.2 to 5.3 and after bringing back up
TSM to check things. When we click on a object on the tree
(using the 5.2 Gui) a new window pops up? Has anyone e
I had a PMR opened and received this response from support...
The efix exposed a code error in TSM. APAR IC47636 has been opened for
this issue. The fix is anticipated, no guarantees, subject to change, at
the discretion of IBM, to be in TSM 5.2.7 set for 12/16/05.
Nancy Backhaus
Enterprise S
Yes, that behavior has been discussed on the listserv about a month ago.
I believe someone had an APAR open on it with IBM.
I believe we were guessing that it was a problem with something in the
5.3 ML2 files that caused the different behavior on the windowing.
Look through the archives f
Hello,
We just upgraded from AIX 5.2 to 5.3 and after bringing back up
TSM to check things. When we click on a object on the tree
(using the 5.2 Gui) a new window pops up? Has anyone ever
experienced this issue?
Thanks in advance!
AIX 5.3
TSM 5.3.1.4 (using 5.2 GUI)
Or, if the Essbase has multiple services (MS Exchange, for example, has
multiple services running)
you do it this way:
PRESCHEDULECMD "C:\path\name.of.pre.bat"
POSTSCHEDULECMD "C:\path\name.of.post.bat"
And in the .bat file, you put in as many "net start service_name" or
"net stop service_name"
Yes.
DO NOT LOSE THOSE PASSWORDS! :>)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Choudarapu, Ramakrishna (GTI)
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 12:33 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Encryption Question
Thanks Wanda.
But, in case, if E
Thanks Wanda.
But, in case, if ENCryptkey is Prompt, then it can take a different
passwords for each backup, and the same password should be supplied
while restoring that particular file/object. Am I right?
Thanks,
Rama
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Yes, on all the files backed up in the FUTURE.
Nothing happens to backup versions already stored on the server, from
backups taken before you turned on encryption.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Choudarapu, Ramakrishna (GTI)
Sent: Fr
HI Tab,
I think "it depends".
When I was using it, the answer was yes. What we used it for was
squishing a lot of .pst files. They tended to be fairly large, up to
500m, and were excellent candidates for subfile, because only a small %
of the .pst file actually did change each day. (Besides be
HI All,
When "ENCryptkey Save" option is used, as the password is stored in the
registry, does the same encryption key password is taken for all the
backups performed on the filespace mentioned at include.encrypt?
Thanks,
Rama
If you are n
The non-NDMP way:
You can use the TSm client on a different server to back up the logical
NAS drives.
You can map the NAS logical drives to the host you want to do the
backup, and put the drive letter in the DOMAIN statement.
Or you can use UNC names in the DOMAIN statement.
It works, but it's not
Anton,
You can do both, we have a mixture in our complex.
We prefer our customers use NDMP, since it has been
faster. Depending on your data retention policies in your backup
storage pools, and frequency between full and incremental backups on
NDMP, our NDMP clients accumulate a *lot* more data
But how about your DSM.OPT files ? They have to be pointed to by the
dsmcad daemon to use the correct one.
For example, here are two entries in my DSM.SYS
SErvername vram1_incremental
COMMMethod TCPip
TCPPort1500
TCPServeraddress TSMAIX2.UCC.VCU.EDU
NODEName
Actually the server, clanas01, IS the client I'm trying to backup. I was
using the shares instead of g$ as it was much easier to manager
management classes on a pershare basis instead of mucking about with
include/exclude for the entire g drive.
I'm testing it tonight having added the system acco
Henrik - Someone should check me on this, but I believe that KEEPMP=No
is why Query MOunt does not show a mount for the tape which
Query SEssion reports. Note that the Session shows a very long Seconds
count, which I believe indicates how long the media has been idle, as
in waiting for t
On Nov 4, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Ryan P wrote:
It is Redhat ES 3.0, it seems the httpport value works but only
for the
first server stanza (tsmserv), the second one (tsmservora) it seems to
ignore it. Am I doing something wrong?
...
You don't say how you are attempting to utilize the second stanz
Hi,
Does anyone have an idea or know why TSM displays wrong volume name?
//Henrik
tsm: X>q se f=d
Session established with server X: Linux/x86_64
Server Version 5, Release 3, Level 2.0
Server date/time: 04-11-2005 08:45:23 Last access: 04-11-2005
08:17:36
Sess Comm. Sess Wait By
I just started to use subfile backup and here are my observations:
* it saves a lot of disk/tape space *IF* used correctly
* you should use it for big files that don't change were much - we use it for
Outlook PST files
* Don't use it for a complete file server - the 1GB limit of the subfilecache
It is Redhat ES 3.0, it seems the httpport value works but only for the
first server stanza (tsmserv), the second one (tsmservora) it seems to
ignore it. Am I doing something wrong?
Here is my dsm.sys
SErvername tsmserv
COMMmethod TCPip
TCPPort 1500
TCPServeradd
Like lots of users, our tape libraries are overloaded and we're looking
for ways to reduce what we're keeping before spending money on new
equipment.
Server: TSM 5.1.10 on AIX 5.2
Clients: mostly TSM 5.1.7 on Windows XP/200x.
Storage: mix of disk, 3570, and LTO
Most filesystems are configured to m
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005, Vincent RATAJSZCZAK might have said:
> Mike,
>
> I'm very interesting by your TSM monitoring solution, based on NetIQ
> products.
>
> Could you describe us the minimal products/modules of NetIQ you are using
> to achieve, and a short description of the solution please ?
Happi
Mike,
I'm very interesting by your TSM monitoring solution, based on NetIQ
products.
Could you describe us the minimal products/modules of NetIQ you are using
to achieve, and a short description of the solution please ?
Best regards
Vincent
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dis
23 matches
Mail list logo