Is your Next Storage Pool: a tape pool?
This is where your process is looking for a mountpoint (drive).
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James Choate
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: ANR1134W warning
I updated a the hi/lo threshold on a storage pool to 0/0 to force a
migration.
I received the following warning message. ANR1134W.
Here is the resolution from the messages guide:
ANR1134W Migration terminated for storage pool
storage pool name - insufficient number of
mount points available
whoa...
I don't read Chinese, but I think I think this reply is saying
unflattering things about my mother.
:-) just kidding...
Can you tell it's been a long week and I need to go home?
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL P
You are right, the drive can be subdivided in that way if there
is a logical structure to the directories.
In our hardest cases, higher level directory structure changes
frequently (and then data is missed)or the directory structure so
lopsided that it is difficult to divide it eve
We were using it to back up 5.4 million files but they were in fact, as
you've said, on multiple drives (actually unc connections). That is not
quite 15M. Would it still not work if the domain statements read: Domain
d:\data Domain d:\apps Domain d:\otherFiles in each of the dsm.opt files?
I kno
That methodology works when you have multiple drives, but when you have
one monster drive with millions of little files, this won't work.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David W Litten
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 3:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@V
Egon,
The following is all based on Windows nodes. I'm not sure how it differs
for non Windows systems.
you can use the wizard in the TSM GUI to create the client acceptor and
scheduler service. You can also use it to create multiple scheduler
services. You need to give each instance a unique nam
Hi,
I would disagree on your point.
Having 15 million files on one nodes crash dsmsvc process due to memory
problems. Each file stored on the TSM servers creates a database entry that
needs about 300 bytes in memory during backup. That means that the client has
to handle about 300*15*10**6/10**
I'm getting ready to add more disk to my TSM server,
Are there any advatage/disadvatages to using a Virtual tape library
instead of TSM defined file device types.
(Do TSM file device types work with multi session restores?)
Doug Thorneycroft
> Systems Analyst
> County Sanitation Districts of Los A
The fioScanDirEntry entries are explained at www.ibm.com...
Search on+rhap +lcmt
The "duplicate volume label" is odd, and may reflect a client and/or
server cloptset specification of the same drive more than once: do
'dsmc q opt' to check the compiled list. A lesser possibility I could
imag
I've seen similar symptoms when a process needs a scratch tape... TSM will
reserve a tape drive, look for a scratch, kill the process, then retry the
process and go through the same cycle. Usually with Reclaims, which retry
every minute. Also, if there are more than one processes looking for
scra
Has anyone an explanation for the following error messages:
(Client: MacOS 10.3.9 with client version 5.2.3.0)
16.06.2005 00:12:50 fioScanDirEntry(): The object 'XServerHD:.vol' has
Creator 'rhap' & Type 'lcmt'. Objects with this type and creator are
not managed properly by TSM and must be exclu
It would really help if you cut-and-pasted some of the messages you see
when you run QUERY PROCESS...
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
Office 262.521.56
Actually, I'm thinking it was a tape conflict. We had a node backup
waiting 7 hrs for media. However, the node backup started 3 hours before
the copy pool backups. Once I cancelled the node backup everything started
running again.
I will go through the activity log again, more thoroughly this time
Alos, if you could post the output from a 'query process' and a 'query
mount', that may help. It might be that you have some backup stgpool
processes wiating on tapes in use by other processes/backups etc..
Computer says 'No'..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EM
You may try looking through the activity log.
Also, for example, if you are backing up storage pools used to hold
image backups, because the process does not update it's 'bytecount'
untill it finishes a file, and image backup files can be huge, you may
find everything is actually working fine.
Ho
Yet another thing to remember is that sometimes the MFT can get fragmented.
Disk Keeper has a feature that will defragement it as well as the file system.
I believe you can choose to just defrag the MFT if you want.
Some of my customers have said that they saw noticeable improvement in the
ba
It seems our server has locked up. We are copying our storage pools to our
copypool and nothing seems to be moving, no counts are increasing. Our
server level is 5.1.1. We have 10 tape drives, all online. 8 are in use
and 2 are reserved. Has anyone had this problem before? The dsmserv.err
log doesn
Hi Richard
Thanks for that.
So that means that in my case, I can have volumes 000588-000597 (all K
tapes), assigned to the on site tape pool. These will get used before any
scratch tapes and will never get used for copypool (our off site pool)?
I think that would be fine for me as the main probl
Graham,
There are a number of different ways to do this.
The main thing to remember is that you will need to use the
"/SQLSERVER=" option when communicating with the
different instances of the SQL Server.
The Data Protection for SQL licensing is based upon the number
of CPUs in the machine, not th
Louw,
Failed backups will not be stored in TSM storage.
If Exchange discovers a data integrity error during backup,
the Exchange backup will fail and Data Protection for Exchange
will abort the transaction, freeing all of the space
that the backup occupied.
Thanks,
Del
-
hi all !
thanks for your ideas, they were helpful. the solution is: the mount point
wasn't there for this server...now it works fine.
best regards, have a nice weekend
hi all !
there is a need to now all archived files from a special node, so i tried
the following:
select LL_NAME,count(*) fr
Hi, Farren -
The simplest approach is to do a DEFine Volume to assign K tapes to the
desired storage pool: assigned volumes are used before Scratches. The
downside is that the tapes remain assigned to the stgpool until deleted,
which may be fine for you. You would additionally want to at least
te
Hi all
Is there a way to issue the move data command for a volume such that you
can specify the volume you want to move the data to? The reason I ask is
that I have one on-site tapepool (all 3590 J tapes), and I want to start
adding some K tapes (extended capacity), to the mix. For this reason I w
No, i am on the tsm server, and so i am in a linux box and on the same
machine.
regards, Dierk
"ADSM: Dist
25 matches
Mail list logo
