Seeing this post prompted me to run a test. It appears that Windows 2003
cluster ensures the replication of the changed password happens right away, not
when the group fails over.
Details:
I have 3 test clusters a Windows 2000 cluster a Windows 2003 cluster and a
Windows 2003 Itanium cluster. I
On Jun 8, 2005, at 6:57 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
Why is my AIX TSM server lying about the "slot count" in my 3583
Library ?
When I check the 3583 via the panel, it says there are 3-free slots.
TSM refuses to check any more tapes into this library, saying it is
full !
Yes, I have
All,
First time poster, fairly new to the whole thing, so help much appreciated.
We've got a TSM server on which we've just upgraded the disk array, from 1TB
to 2TB. It also has a Spectralogic Treefrog unit with two AIT2 drives and a
15-slot robot.
We're looking to keep the current generation of
Why is my AIX TSM server lying about the "slot count" in my 3583 Library ?
When I check the 3583 via the panel, it says there are 3-free slots.
TSM refuses to check any more tapes into this library, saying it is full !
Yes, I have done an audit of the library (barcodes)...numerous times !
Hi Wanda,
I have some real data which might mean something for your question. I am in
the process of moving all the files on one server into collocation groups.
I am copying tapes to sequential disk to do this. The sizes of full disk
volumes vary a lot which might mean that an aggregate won't go
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Debbie Bassler wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone reclaims copy storage pools. Currently, we
> execute a schedule to reclaim space from our copy storage pool using the
> upd stgp copypool recl=80 command, this is scheduled for 15:00. Then we
> have a schedule to set the thresho
Thanks to allI had a brain block...I was thinking our copy storage
pool was collocated, as are our primary pools,,boy, it's hard to get
back in the saddle (and stay on) :-)
Lawrence Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
06/08/2005 04:13 PM
Please respond to
DEFINITION OF BACKUP
RULES:
VEREXISTS: # of versions to keep while file exists (adjusted by
RETEXTRA)
VERDELETED: # of versions to keep on TSM when file is deleted from
client
A couple of weeks ago I was given the opportunity to take on the TSM admin
role :-)
I was wondering if anyone reclaims copy storage pools. Currently, we
execute a schedule to reclaim space from our copy storage pool using the upd
stgp copypool recl=80 command, this is scheduled for 15:00. Then we
Your command syntax asks TSM to expire things called
file
and /home/nysta/tclmgr/nysta-sector7/tollcoll_plz/*/*"
You probably don't have a file out there called "file".
Richard Sims
On Jun 8, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Lawrence Clark wrote:
expire files...
I do a
q backup
expire files...
I do a
q backup "/home/nysta/tclmgr/nysta-sector7/tollcoll_plz/*/*"
and get a long list
but when I do a
tsm> exp file "/home/nysta/tclmgr/nysta-sector7/tollcoll_plz/*/*"
I get
Expire function invoked.
Backup files will be expired. Do you wish to proceed? (Yes
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David W Litten
>I'm using 5.2.2.9 client to back up win2003 to a 5.2.4 server.
>Haven't had
>any issues except with VSS. Those same issues with VSS were
>also present on my 5.3.0 nodes.
Wandering the Microsoft support site, I
> A user received this from one of her machines. According to the Actlog,
> the password expired at the exact time, but processing continued and
> backups worked again last night. I can't find details in the manuals, but
> my supposition is that the PASSEXP=, and we use the default of 90, does no
I'm using 5.2.2.9 client to back up win2003 to a 5.2.4 server. Haven't had
any issues except with VSS. Those same issues with VSS were also present on
my 5.3.0 nodes.
"Loon, E.J. van -
SPLXM"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
FYI
We have the latest TSM client backup/archive code running on Solaris
10 test machine now so it is running but not yet supported.
We also have the latest TDPO code installed for Oracle and is running in
our test Solaris 10 machine but not yet supported.
Justin Case
TSM Administrator/Stor
A user received this from one of her machines. According to the Actlog,
the password expired at the exact time, but processing continued and
backups worked again last night. I can't find details in the manuals, but
my supposition is that the PASSEXP=, and we use the default of 90, does not
apply
> For SPARC, we are currently targetting end of 2Q05 or beginning of 3Q05.
> Note that this is not a formal announcement or commitment, and is subject
> to change at the discretion of IBM. If you need a more formal answer, you
> should consult with your IBM marketing or account representative.
>
>
Richard,
This is what I call helpfull information ! It confirms what I read in
EMC's engineering white paper "Backup-to-Disk Guide with IBM Tivoli
Storage Manager", where they recommend using RAID3 for storage pools.
Unfortunately there was not any word about TSM DB and logs ...
As our Clariion is
For SPARC, we are currently targetting end of 2Q05 or beginning of 3Q05.
Note that this is not a formal announcement or commitment, and is subject
to change at the discretion of IBM. If you need a more formal answer, you
should consult with your IBM marketing or account representative.
There are n
At the recent EMC conference at a session about Clariions, they indicated
several things about Clariions that I thought I would share. From my
notes . . . .
1) Raid 0+1 is better for writes, but doesn't help with reads. It will
only/mostly use just one copy for reads. It's not as smart as a
dm
Hi,
I've got a problem with a 5.2.x client on Linux talking to a 5.2.1.3
Windows-based TSM server
This a client option is set on the server:
EXCLUDE /tmp/.../*
The following error gets logged:
ANS1042S Include/Exclude pattern has a '...' without beginning/ending directory
delimiter
I
We have taken the jump into testing for our TSM v5.1.6 to V5.3 upgrade.
We got ISC/AC installed on a AIX server and are going through the learning
curve for it,
for which I've got some questions (like everyone else!) . . . .
1) On the table lists that AC creates there is a icon for "enable/disab
Richard, Frank
I really would like to use RAID 0+1, unfortunately this would "waste"
too much of the precious space I'm needing for primary pools.
Richard's idea seems to be the right one : I'll try running some
performance tests (expiration, db backup) on several possible settings
and opt for th
If you've got enough disks for it you also might want to think about a RAID 0+1
for the DB/Log volumes, as this would give much better write performance than
RAID5.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/8/2005 6:38:45 AM >>>
Hi Brian,
I wish I had a magic formula to tell you what to do, but there is none.
Hi All,
Has anyone heard when TSM will support Solaris 10?
Thanks,
Steve Roder
University at Buffalo
([EMAIL PROTECTED] | (716)645-3564)
Hi Brian,
I wish I had a magic formula to tell you what to do, but there is none.
My suggestion is to create a raid5 raidset for the db/log, put your db/log
onto it and run an expiration and db backup to see if you get the
performance you need.
If it's not good enough, then blow away the raidset
Hi Richard!
This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you very much for pointing me
to the right direction!
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 13:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST
On Jun 8, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:
I cannot find any information about whether using 5.3 clients to a 5.2
server is supported.
Eric - That info is always in the front of the client manuals, under
"Upgrade path for clients and servers". Answer: Yes.
The usual cave
Hi Eric,
In response to your query is 5,2 server with 5,3 clients supported.
This is a general answer because we are not yet on 5.3
IBM has always stated with TSM that one level down is supported and I have
seen nothing to contradict this.
It would make it very difficult to upgrade if this was not
Hi Richard!
That's not what I asked. I know it works, but I would like to know whether
it is supported.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Richard van Denzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:19
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.
Eric,
We use TSM 5.3 clients on several of our Windows clients to back-up to a
TSM 5.2.4.4 server on AIX without problems.
Richard.
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
08-06-2005 09:28
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: A
Hi *SM-ers!
We are forced to downgrade our server level on our new TSM Server
environment because the hardware we are about to use (EMC DL700) is not 5.3
certified.
We are already using several 5.3.0 clients, so in the new environment we
will backup to a 5.2.4.0 server (on AIX) with 5.3.0.0 clients
32 matches
Mail list logo
