I will be out of the office starting 04/05/2005 and will not return until
05/05/2005.
I am away from the office until Thursday 5th May
HI
We actually work with TSM 5.1.9.2 (witch is not the lastest version) on
W2K SP4 on hp dl 360 BI XEON and 600 GB of pooldisk( SAN)
It works fine except for the drive SDLT 2 ( not enought speed )
François LEGER
System & ITSM Administrator
---
We're running our Datacenter TSM server on RH3 on an x335 dual 2.4 with
4GB of memory and it's been running fine for us. Don't have much of a
disk pool available to me but it works. Same TSM version as you.
In comparison our Windows TSM server at corporate just plain bites.
We're moving that to a p
You can find support lifecycle info at the TSM support page
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html.
Go to that page, then look for "Tivoli support lifecycle" link down the
right-hand side of the page.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
T
Probably 18 - 24 months. 5.1 is EOS in 9/2005.
Here is the link.
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/eos.html
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lawrence Clark
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:18 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARI
Please refer to
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/eos.html
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
Office 262.521.5627
>-Original Message-
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:
We are running a TSM server at 5.2
5.3 is out.
Does anyone know the date support for 5.2 will end?
Yes We are running 3 TSM servers on AIX 5.3 and TSM Code 5.2.2.3
and we backup 2.5 TB a night in less than 6 hours with all having large
disk cache pools.
Justin Case
TSM Administrator/Storage Administrator
Analyst IT OIT Infrastructure Support
334 Blackwell Street
2nd floor Suite 2108 Durham,NC
With most Pocket PCs, you back up to a flat file on a workstation/server
using Microsoft ActiveSync, and then backup the flat file up with TSM.
I've done PDA restores from restored backup files. Not a problem.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
Ti
Hi All,
Does anybody have experience with backing up Smart Phones/PDA.
We came across couple of request (usually from sales force); they have
PDA with Pocket PC windows installed, memory cards up to 1GB, and they
do 90% of their work from PDA's
Thanks,
Joe Crnjanski
Infinity Network Solutions I
I have done the experiment with sequential disk files. The data is as
readable as it was on the original disk file. If you want security,
encryption is mandatory.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com)
IBM Premier Business Partner
121 Cheshire Lane, Suite 700
Where there is a will, there is a way. If the full database backups
were in that box, it is possible to recover data in one way or another.
Without the db backup, there isn't much chance of putting together the
pieces. Depending on the systems being backed up (OS, database,
etc...). I believe an
Yes, indeed. If those were TSM backup tapes, how much concern would it be?
We know that without the TSM server, it would be impossible to identify
what files were on the tapes. But would it still be possible to dump the
tape and recognize name and SSN data? How difficult (or trivial) would it
be
It is a perpetual annoyance. We wind up with 2 different computers being
backed up under 1 nodename. This causes all sorts of problems, among
them an inability to restore. Which is the point of backing up in the
first place.
So we look for a number of things. We look for IP address changes (which
Richard Sims wrote:
On May 3, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
This naturally means you'll pay a lot more for a IBM pSeries server
than
you will for a comparably equipped Intel server.
To add a bit: Look into the used marketplace. We went that way, and
got high power (p650) at a low pri
Hi,
More info about what sort of performance problems you are having would
help.
Some info about our setup.
Multiple servers:
Win 2000 SP4 running ITSM 5.2.4.0
IBM X360, 2 cpu (HT) 1,6 GHZ, 4 GB ram
Disk sub: SSA JBOD config.
DB 69 GB (65 % util) - 86 GB (76 % util)
Number of defined nodes:
Hi
TSM server 5.2.0.2 on windows 2000 SP4
IBM X335, 1 XEON 2.4 GHZ , 1.6GB mem...
Luc
"Bos, Karel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
2005-05-03 11:32 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:
On May 3, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
This naturally means you'll pay a lot more for a IBM pSeries server
than
you will for a comparably equipped Intel server.
To add a bit: Look into the used marketplace. We went that way, and
got high power (p650) at a low price. Don't overlook S
Hi Luc,
On all platforms running ITSM server you can get performance issues.
Most of them can be solved by tuning things. It would help to know what
kind of performance issues you have and what versions and hardware you
are running.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist St
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Luc Beaudoin
>I have a TSM server on a WIN2K server I have some
>performance issue,
>I suspect that maybe Windows 2000 can be a cause
>
>Is there a difference if TSM is installed on a AIX box ... or
>another OS
Ther
Hi all
I have a TSM server on a WIN2K server I have some performance issue,
I suspect that maybe Windows 2000 can be a cause
Is there a difference if TSM is installed on a AIX box ... or another OS
Thanks
Luc
Micahael,
It sounds to me like that during the upgrade the TDP Oracle soft links
were corrupted. Please verify that the following exist:
/usr/lib/libobk64.a ->
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/libobk64.a
and/or
$ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.a ->
/usr/tivoli/tsm/clie
TSM_User wrote:
Just because they listen on every NIC doesn't mean they will all get
used. We have TSM servers with 4 GB NIC's. We have 4 TSM instances
on it. Each one has a seperate Port. Of course all 4 TSM instances
will respond to requests coming into any of the NIC's. However in our
client
Hi all,
Richard Sims wrote:
Remco -
Perhaps you could elaborate on how this would be useful? Having the
server ignore requests which come into the system via a certain path
doesn't seem productive.
It is, actually, from a security perspective. This way, one could
dedicate an instance to a subnet an
Try something like this...
select cs.domain_name,cs.schedule_name, cs.starttime,
cs.dayofweek,a.node_name -
from associations a, client_schedules cs -
where a.domain_name='WINDOWS' -
and a.domain_name=cs.domain_name -
and a.schedule_name=cs.schedule_name -
order by a.node_name, cs.dayofw
The TSM server time is from Show Time.
Checking the TZ var with ps eww PID gives a list which doesn't contain
an entry for 'TZ'
Dsmserv was started by root;
>Ps -ef | grep dsmserv
root 1560588 1 42 15:00:05 - 631:22 ./dsmserv
this will have been via, 'nohup ./dsmserv 2>&1 >/dev/null
Hello All!
I would like to create a report of all nodes and their respective schedules
within the windows domain. I know that this will require a join between
the associations table and the client_schedules table, but I am unsure of
how to accomplish this task.
I know that a statement to get the
On May 3, 2005, at 6:31 AM, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
Hello *SM'ers,
We have an AIX 5.2.0.0 server that believes the time is 11:25. This
is correct.
TSM 5.2.2.3 running on that machine believes it is 10:25.
Is there a way to force TSM's date to the same as the system date? I
have tried
Hello *SM'ers,
We have an AIX 5.2.0.0 server that believes the time is 11:25. This
is correct.
TSM 5.2.2.3 running on that machine believes it is 10:25.
Is there a way to force TSM's date to the same as the system date? I
have tried ACCEPT DATE, but although TSM reports the system date ha
Hi David!
We are not there yet, but we will also use an ESS for the database volumes
in the very near future.
The way which TSM uses it's database (which isn't very intelligent by the
way) makes it very important to allocate as much volumes as possible. So
rather 20 small ones than two large volume
30 matches
Mail list logo
