I think a number of people have summed up the issues here well, no need for
me to harp on them. The one exception I would make is in regards to
creating an 'intuitive interface'.
So far, IMHO, the interface is far from intuitive. While I can see the
theoretical logic behind burying the Schedules
Steve,
In order to perform installs without using the GUI you can perform silent
installs using switches passed to the *.MSI. For more information on this:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp?toc=/com.ibm.itstorage.doc/toc.xml
Select "Storage Manager for Windows"
Expand th
Yes, I checked all the pertinent things... at the time the message was
issued, the disk pool had 85GB available, the tape pool had over 600GB
available (on FILLING volumes), and there were 4 scratches up for grabs.
The tape pool has maxscratch=999, and there are only 55 volumes currently
in the poo
"but why design to do that?" For the very practical reason that money doesn't
grow on trees.
If someone were to purchase and IBM 3584 with 12 LTO3 drives would we suggest
that they use 12 HBA's or 6 dual port HBA's? In most cases I think not. There
is a number of drives per HBA which should b
Saw this issue with UDB backup. It justed looked at the size of the disk spool
space at the start of backup.
On Wednesday, February 09, 2005, at 09:08AM, Robin Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Has anyone encountered the subject message?
>
>We saw it today in a Oracle RMAN backup... what I th
Andrew Raibeck wrote:
While I have indicated that Intel support is not in plan, the ADSM-L forum
is really not the proper place to address TSM product requirements. If you
have a need for this support (or for any product requirement), you should
open a formal requirement through your IBM/Tivoli sal
Hello All!
I am very conflicted about how to use NDMP backups for my environment.
Here is our config:
TSM AIX 5.2.2.5 server
EMC NS704G with 3 datamovers and 1 failover
Windows 2003 TSM Client at 5.3.0
I was wondering if we will have to mount the filesystems on a Windows
server and just back the
At 02:04 PM 2/9/2005, Andrew Raibeck wrote:
I have it on good authority that server-to-server sessions are not
disabled with DISABLE SESSIONS. Admin sessions are not disabled, either.
Andy,
I have had problems with this on 5.2.1 using virtual volumes. If I disable
sessions on server A, then server
Hi all
I try to use BART PE to restore a TSM BACKUP IMAGE on a IBM 335
server
but the NIC card is not find ... so no IP address .. is there anyone who
knows how to add NIC drivers for IBM servers into a BART PE CD
thanks
Luc
The point was that two HBAs for tape only provides bandwidth for two tape
drives with compressible data, not four. Many people seem to under
appreciate the bandwidth requirements of a properly designed tape system.
For database data, it is usually the disk that is to slow to achieve
optimum backu
Seems like any tuning you did for one I/O workload would be sub-optimal for
the other.
Are large transfer sizes still de riguer for LTO?
[RC]
"John E.
Vincent"
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent by:
Hi Paul,
I have it on good authority that server-to-server sessions are not
disabled with DISABLE SESSIONS. Admin sessions are not disabled, either.
In TSM 5.3, additional granularity was added to the ENABLE SESSIONS and
DISABLE SESSIONS command; check out the 5.3 README for this info (the
online
Hi,
I've built a bootable windows cd (win pe or bartpe). Boot off the CD start dsmc
client util for image backup or image restore.
As far as I can remember image support is only supported on Windows OS. However
you could dump the disk to a file (e.g. using dd) and backup that file to TSM.
Rega
Hi TSM-ers,
for some time now I've been looking for the reason why my SAP backups (3
different machines) stop without any messages.
Now I've found the following entry in the eventlog - Tree System Log.
Event Type: Information
Event Source: Application Popup
Event Category: None
Event ID:
Nope. TSM does not support remote tape drives--one of the costs of
centralized backup strategies.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627
>-Original Message-
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of TSM
>Sent:
Did you check the setting of the maxscratch on the tapepool, and then
check to see how many tapes are in use?
Ben
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robin Sharpe
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sub
Hello,
is it possible to use one drive (3592) exclusive for one nas-connection
(NetApp) ?
There will be no physical connection between this drive and the TSM
server.
If we set online=no in the path between the TSM server and the drive,
would the TSM server mount tapes for the NetApp ?
I cannot te
Has anyone encountered the subject message?
We saw it today in a Oracle RMAN backup... what I think happened is, at
the time the backup script started, there was not enough space in the
ORACLE_DISK pool, nor in the ORACLE_LTO2 pool which is next in the
heirarchy. Other sessions of the same job w
Is there a way to disable client sessions without disabling
server-to-server sessions? We want to disable users from accessing our TSM
servers, but not disable server-to-server sessions.
I know there is now a tcpadminport, in addition to tcpport, but the
documentation for "disable sessions" seems
Anyone got the super secret squirrel command to kill the locks causing
this system deadlock before this server augers into the dirt?
tsm:>q pro
Process Process Description Status
Number
-
1,393 M
Excellent point! And thank you for the tips concerning EDT and ACSLS. I
am hoping to upgrade to 5.3 shortly and eliminate the need for Gresham, but
I am concerned about the same amount of functionality. Thanks!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6
Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I can find the rule that a tape drive must be on a separate zone fr
Perhaps, IBM site Technote 1194590.
On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:39 AM, Stef Coene wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 21:10, Ben Bullock wrote:
> The documents say you are supposed to NOT have SAN and tape
> devices running on the same HBAs.
Mhh, can you point me to a paper stating this? I can't find any.
I can find the rule that a tape drive must be on a separate zone from the
disks.
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 00:33, Mark D. Rodriguez wrote:
> Stef,
>
> There are several ways to accomplish this. However,, you didn't give us
> all the details so I will make some assumptions. I will assume you are
> using at least 2 switches for redundant paths. I will assume that the
> ora
Hello ,
can someone help me ? :
I am looking for a select statement that gives as Output
3 values
the total sum of
'items' 'bytes' 'processing-time'
for all the mgration processes that have been finished in the
past 'n' hours .
I have problem to get the processing-time.
Someone got this
Hi Orville!
I don't think this is really necessary since LTO2. LTO1 performance does
suffer when you can't keep the drive streaming, but LTO2 and 3 adjust their
tape speed if they detect that the amount of incoming data is too low. So
there should not be any back-hitching here...
Kindest regards,
E
27 matches
Mail list logo
