I am having an issue with EXPORT TO SERVER.
This is a z/OS TSM server. Currently at 5.2.3.4. I am trying to export
this node to an AIX TSM server, also at 5.2.3.4.
I have already exported thedefinitions and adjusted them for the proper
storage-pool names, etc.
But, I can not get the data to ex
Several comments:
- the initial full will run a long time
- turn on client compression
- implement QOS (quality of service) on the routers to limit tsm traffic
I don't know much about this last item, but our network folks just made
changes
to our routers to limit tsm traffic to no more than 80% o
I asked a while ago about archive attempts on files larger than 4GB
failing on the 5.02.03 NetWare client. I know some people think it is a
NetWare issue but we've done some research of our own and other backup
products seem to work with the NetWare TSAs in that situation. We really
need to move fo
Hi Andrew. This works exactly as advertised. The purpose for the script is
not to have tapes left behind in the wall of the library when you have
more than 10 tapes to be moved. So, you reply 9 times to fill the 10 IO
slots, remove the tapes, then reply 10 more times to get the next batch of
ten ta
The 3583 with LTO-2 drives will read/write the LTO-1 tapes, too. Just define
the new 3583 library/drives/paths and then point your 3581 devclass to the
3583 library. Load your LTO-1 storagepool tapes in the 3583 as private, mark
them read-only for restores. Then checkin your LTO-2 tapes as scratch.
Our MOVE DRMMEDIA command for our 3584 library in cases of more than 10
tapes has just started putting the tapes one at a time in the Entry/Exit
port and waiting for a reply for each one. It used to fire ten in and
then ask for a reply. I'm at a loss to figure out why as the script
hasn't changed.
Bruno,
I did this same thing about 6 months ago. The only difference was we are on
AIX. We just hooked both libraries to the TSM server, created a new
devclass, library, tape storage pool, etc, for the new 3583 library and
than ran move data on all the old LTO1 tapes. Pretty straight forwar
Fellows,
I've faced the following situation: a customer has a 3581 Tape Library (LTO
1) where is defined its storage pool's. It intends to adquire a 3583-L72
(LTO 2). Its TSM server (5.2.2) is running on a Windows 2k server xSeries
232. I gues it's possible to connect the two libraries to the TSM
Monte,
We do about 130 servers, about 40 are single servers at the other end of t1
lines in remote offices. The T1's also carry VOIP for those offices.
The daily change rate on some is high, some are low. It does help us when
we use the TSM journal option. Especially if you have a high number
Vega, Taumel wrote:
In all my client's dsm.opt file I have following line:
Inclexcl c:\tivoli\tsm\baclient\inclexcl.file
This file is the same across al my clients and it contains a very very
long list of exclude statements
I am trying to accomplish the same from a Cloptset on the server.(
Point
Fellow TSM administrators:
My company is currently looking at backing up approximately 40 NT servers at
our remote locations, back to our local data center. Each location has around
10gb - 40gb of storage, and very minimal daily change activity on the files.
Some of the locations are 256k da
Forgot to add pages (32000 pages).
Should be BUFPOOLSIZE 128000 (in MB).
Regards, Samiran Das
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Das,
Samiran (IDS ECCS)
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW:
I believe I told 128MB. 32000x4KB (page size) = 128MB.
Regards, Samiran Das
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: Insufficient Memory H
No, No, No.
The 128MB is just fine.
I went through a "tuning session" with IBM TSM on MVS support, a year ago.
Talked directly with their sole TSM/MVS internals person.
He recommended the 128MB DB cache as well as 512MB for REGION.
Also recommended tweaking the MAXQUICKSIZE to 20MB fr
Jack,
I think your problem is with these lines:
for /F "eol=A tokens=1* skip=8 " %%i in (TEMP3.TXT) do (
%DSMC% KILL PROC %%i
)
They should read:
for /F "eol=A tokens=1* skip=8 " %%i in (TEMP3.TXT) do (
%DSMC% /*_CANCEL_ */PROC %%i
)
There is no TSM server command of KILL PROC, but there is a CANCE
I use the following two scripts to get a list of those big
backup files.
First run script 1 to get a list of the tapes you used during the
last backup run. Then run script 2 for every tape you got from script 1.
1) Get a list of tapes used by last nights backup run (change start and
stop time and
On Nov 23, 2004, at 8:06 AM, Coats, Jack wrote:
...
There are some that 'naturally' come from our Exchange servers (4 per
day).
But there seem to be to many of them for that to be the only source.
...
Do 'Query CONtent F=D' on newly written tapes to determine
what
the files are.
Richard Sims
Jack,
I think its txnbytelimit (on the client end), and the max is 25600 - WAY
below a gig.
Aggregates are not your problem.
I suggest you check your client stats (either from the activity log, or
from TOR) to figure out which clients are likely to be sending the big
chunks, then check their sche
> On my little windows TSM server (with 2G of RAM), I am being killed by 12 to
> 19 GIGABYTE files.
>
> There are some that 'naturally' come from our Exchange servers (4 per day).
> But there seem to be to many of them for that to be the only source.
>
> Knowing my user data, thinking that these ar
Hi Ingrid!
Have you checked the SBTIO.LOG file? In most cases it contains more clear
messages.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Kowieski.Ingrid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 15:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Or
Hello!
Apparently there was an issue when we went from TSM server version 5.1 to
5.2 and the population of a table that would allow us to exceed 256MB. The
system admin for the mainframe is adding this dynamically until they can
safely IPL the system where TSM resides. Hopefully everything will
We are getting the following error message when running an RMAN backup
with the Oracle TDP (5.2.2.0):
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===
RMAN-00571:
Thanks Eric. I knew it was out there somewhere!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/23/2004 08:47 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Old So
Hi Curtis!
For Solaris 2.5.1 you will need to use the ADSM 3.1 client. You can find it
at:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sol25/
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
In all my client's dsm.opt file I have following line:
Inclexcl c:\tivoli\tsm\baclient\inclexcl.file
This file is the same across al my clients and it contains a very very
long list of exclude statements
I am trying to accomplish the same from a Cloptset on the server.(
Pointing the Clients
Hi Everyone, me again:
I'm searching for a TSM client that will work with Solaris 2.5, or Sun OS
2.5 whatever it was. I realize this is not a supported OS, but I'm willing
to live with that. I've searched this site
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/
Your BUFPOOSIZE value of 135168 is in higher side.
Try something like 32000 to start with and monitor cache hit pct.
Regards, Samiran Das
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schaub
Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH
Sent: Tuesday, November 23,
Mark,
Thanks for the link but I don't see anything there about the 5.2.3.5
release date.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/23/2004 9:05:47 AM >>>
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
>TSM 5.2.3.5 is not on the download server as of 8am est today.
> I
Why does the MAX init storage show 256 MB and you have 512MB Regionsize?
Monitor the CSA TSM-usage with your Z/OS Monitor to get further information of
the storageusage (growing?).
Do we again have a problem with the MaxQuickFree bytes?
Im just thinking
regards
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nac
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
>TSM 5.2.3.5 is not on the download server as of 8am est today.
> Is there an updated expected release date?
Please refer to
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21171012
for information on schedul
As we learned this morning, 5.2.3.5 should be available next week (no day
yet!).
Richard.
David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
23-11-2004 14:32
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
TSM 5.2.3.5 is not on the download server as of 8am est today. Is
there
an updated expected release date?
David
On my little windows TSM server (with 2G of RAM), I am being killed by 12 to
19 GIGABYTE files.
There are some that 'naturally' come from our Exchange servers (4 per day).
But there seem to be to many of them for that to be the only source.
Knowing my user data, thinking that these are really
Regionsize = 512MB
show memu S
Operation Results
MAX initial storage 268435456 (256.0 MB
Does someone have a script (Unix is ok, Windows is preferred) that can
cancel currently running migrations?
My script doesn't seem to work just right. Any suggestions (or a script
that works for you :-) ) would really help!
Here is my attempt:
@Echo Off
REM c:\SBIB\TSMKillReclaimation.c
Please send us:
Regionsize and the Output from sh memu
regards
joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Joni Moyer
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2004 13:35
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Insufficient Memory HELP! Server crash
Hello All!
We have just upgraded our TSM server on z/OS from 5.1.8.3. to 5.2.2.5. We
are now receiving S0C4 errors with the following:
IEA705I ERROR DURING GETMAIN SYS CODE = 80A-10 TSMB1 TSMB1 00
IEA705I 00F57100 0088BCC8 0088BCC8 00E61200 2B88
IEA705I ERROR DURING GETMAIN SYS CODE = 878-10
Hi,
We are running TSM Version 5, Release 1 on Sun Version 5 and release 8.
Now my problem is if I see the output of # cfgadm -al
c2::rmt/0 tape connectedconfigured
unknown
c2::rmt/1 tape connectedconfigured
unknown
The above out
Hmm, I forgott ( )...
(STO-W03) Select Node_name, state, count(*) as "Number of trans.logs" from
backups where (node_name='STO-W09-TDP' and
filespace_name='STO-LN01.DOMLOGS') group by Node_name ,state order by
node_name,state
//Henrik
- Forwarded by Henrik Wahlstedt on 2004-11-23 12:19 --
Hello,
I have defined a couple of TSM servers (TSM1, TSM2 etc) on our main TSM
server and I can route commands ex. TSM2:select xyz or TSM2:q se.
My problem is when I try to make a script with selects it wont route the
commands, what did I miss?
11/23/2004 10:31:25 ANR2017I Administrator XXX
40 matches
Mail list logo
