Hi Anyone,
Got a genuine problem, I think.
Environment is:
TSM Svr (running on 1 LPAR of p690)-
-AIX 5.2
-TSM Svr 5.2.3
-TSM Client 5.2.2
-TSM Sysback 5.6.1
-Tape library: 3584LTO (4 drives)
TSM Client (running on 1 LPAR of p690)-
-AIX 5.2 with HACMP
-TSM Client 5.2.3
-TSM Sysback 5.6.3.2
The TS
Hi Anyone,
Got a genuine problem, I think.
Environment is:
TSM Svr (running on 1 LPAR of p690)-
-AIX 5.2
-TSM Svr 5.2.3
-TSM Client 5.2.2
-TSM Sysback 5.6.1
-Tape library: 3584LTO (4 drives)
TSM Client (running on 1 LPAR of p690)-
-AIX 5.2 with HACMP
-TSM Client 5.2.3
-TSM Sysback 5.6.3.2
The TS
>I tried the move data. But the tape also has a write error on it, so I am
>guessing it cannot get to a fragment of a spanned file.
Jack - Standard recourse, then: Restore Volume.
If that isn't possible for some reason, and you've tried Move Data multiple
times, on all your drives, then do a Que
I tried the move data. But the tape also has a write error on it, so I am
guessing it cannot get to a fragment of a spanned file.
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape issue
I occasionally get one of these. Doing a "move data" on it
moves the l
Hi,
Is there a way to delete file space based on the description used to
archive it? I have several file systems that have been archived from
time to time. However last week by mistake the file systems were
archived for seven years. These archives we spread amongst 6 file
systems and total over 2TB
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Boyer
>This box is going production in a week and the backups dont'
>work now! Even
>though it's a SQL error that is being returned, the DBA's
>point to TSM. So it's up to me to fix it.
This is the default behavior of app
Bill,
Did you try this?
tdpsqlc backup dbname full /sqlserver=tcp:server-name.abc.com
for example:
tdpsqlc backup master full /sqlserver=tcp:couples.endicott.ibm.com
What happens?
If you can't get it working, please ask that the PMR be forwarded
to IBM Level 2 support. Level 2 can gathe
Doing some more research on Microsoft and talking with the client, they
re-addressed the cluster on 7/26 when they moved it into their new CISCO
switch with VLAN's configured. I think they changed all the IP addresses
except for the IP address of the SQL Server virtual instance. I found a
couple ar
Bill,
All I can say is that Microsoft found a problem
in MDAC that they had to fix. Every time we have seen the
"[DBNETLIB]ConnectionRead (WrapperRead())" error
when backing up with Data Protection for SQL,
it has turned out to be KB827452. I think I remember
something about registry entries being
A customer wants restored the oldest version of every fileTSM has for a
certain node. What's the best way to do this?
Example:
If there is only one copy of a file and it is active, they want that one.
If there are 2 inactives and 1 active, they want the oldest inactive.
Thanks,
David
I occasionally get one of these. Doing a "move data" on it
moves the little bit of data and frees up the tape.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [
Windows2003 Cluster running SQL Server
TDP SQLServer 5.1.5.0
TSM Client 5.2.2.10
TSM Server on Windows2003 5.2.2.5
We were doing TDP backups of the SQLDatabases just fine, until the cluster
was re-addressed for IP. Now when the TDP backup runs, right at the end it
fails with a DBNETLIB error. It'
What's your reusedelay set to?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Coats, Jack
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape issue
I have a tape that says it is empty if I do a 'q content', but it will not
go b
Ralph and Doug have a good idea. I'll give it a try!
They both suggested doing an 'audit volume'.
-Original Message-
From: Levi, Ralph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape issue
Try doing: audit vol xxx fix=yes
Ral
Have you tried running audit volume ?
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape issue
I have a tape that says it is empty if I do a 'q content', but it will not
go back into scratch.
If I do a
Try doing: audit vol xxx fix=yes
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Coats, Jack
Sent: July 30, 2004 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape issue
I have a tape that says it is empty if I do a 'q content', but it will
no
I have a tape that says it is empty if I do a 'q content', but it will not
go back into scratch.
If I do a 'delete vol' I am told there is still data on the tape.
I am guessing that a set of files is 'bundled together' (I forget the
official techno speak for this, but it helps cluster lots of smal
Muhammad, please upgrade to 5.2.2.5 or even to 5.2.3.0+5.2.3.1 as you are
seeing bugs in 5.2.2.0 that have long been fixed.
Download 5.2.2.5 from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/server/
Download 5.2.3.0 from
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-st
Both can be used, both have advantages and disadvantages.
TSM development is focusing efforts on File Device Class.
Search the archives for some info on which to use
(http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0406/106.html)
Check out the 5.2 Admin guide - it has a nice table comparing disk vs file.
I know that I must be missing something here, but can someone explain why
this D2D backup scheme utilizes what I assume to be the sequential FILE
device type? Why not just use the (random) DISK storage pool type. This
would eliminate any co-location issues, reclaims and not waste ANY disk
space w
You wre correct on the drivers. As for Gresham, just the external library
wil be ok. The library will be managed by ACSLS. You will need
DistribuTape on any client using Lanfree capabilities. They are set up the
same way your server will be.
Congratulations on the L8500, this things looks amazing.
Hello everyone!
A little background of our new environment would be 2 TSM servers, 1
development and 1 production, are AIX 5.2 at the TSM 5.2.2.5 level. They
will be attached, through a McData 6064 director, to an STK SL8500 library
with 18 LTO2 tape drives.
I am not sure what device drivers to
Hi list,
Could anybody tell me if following behaviour is normal :
I have a node which was attributed a mount point limit of 2. This node
has Informix XPS installed, with 4 workers activated.
Problem is that an onbar backup automatically mounts 4 tapes on TSM
server, therefore not respecting TSM
On aix it's possible with th mtlib command (I suppose you can find the same
command on others platforms)
Pour avoir la catégorie d'une cartouche :
mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -qV -V volser
Pour la changer de catégorie
mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -C -V volser (-s catégorie source) -t catégorie
(target) (-n)
Hi,
You can export a node directly to another server using the following commands:
EXPORT ADMIN (Export Administrator Information)
EXPORT NODE (Export Client Node Information)
if needed: EXPORT POLICY (Export Policy Information)
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:37:10 -0500, Pan, Sanjoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
25 matches
Mail list logo
