From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Boyer
>Anyone care to share some experiences with a Cisco SIP router on a z800
>mainframe? I'm working at a client site that has this
>configuration and the
>ANS4966I message are only should a 200-400KB/sec network
>throug
Anyone care to share some experiences with a Cisco SIP router on a z800
mainframe? I'm working at a client site that has this configuration and the
ANS4966I message are only should a 200-400KB/sec network throughput rate for
client sessions. Disk to tape migration runs at 3590E speed, but backups a
We have several applications that due to some performance issues have there
backups running longer than normal on some nights. Does anyone have a good
automated method to monitor backup sessions for a client and either stop
them at a given time if they are still running or notify someone that they
==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ben Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your posting caught my eye with 6 years and 10 different libraries.
I'm going to try to make this not just a 'Me Too'.
I've only had two libraries, but the 3494 was here when I started messing with
ADSM in '97. I've
==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Anderson, Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're currently considering replacing our 2 very large AIX TSM servers with
> a large number (maybe 10 or so) of smaller, Linux based servers. The reason
> for the change is to reduce the impact of hardware failure
Hello All!
I just received the good news that we will be moving our TSM mainframe
environment to an AIX open systems environment. I will be using ACSLS 7.1
and Gresham EDT along with LTO2 tape drives in an STK SL8500. Does anyone
have a similar configuration and any advice for this setup? Also,
...
>The standalone library, while cheaper, means that in 2-3 years I will have
>filled up yet another library now destined to collect dust in a corner.
...
Not necessarily. The Ultrium roadmap:
http://www.lto-technology.com/newsite/html/format_roadmap.html
http://www.qualstar.com/14
Same experience here -
Buying a "cheap" library is like knowing you've accepted the "low bidder"
for brain surgery ;>)
We've been through exactly the same analysis, same strategy, same arguments,
and fortunately have always had the same results - more cost effective in
the long run to buy the big
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tab Trepagnier
>TSM Server 5.1.9.0 on AIX 5.2 ML-2
>TSM Server 5.2 media on hand
>
>We have outgrown our 3583 and 3575s, so I'm looking for a new tape
>library. At first I though my only choices were another standalone
>library
Your posting caught my eye with 6 years and 10 different
libraries.
We have been on TSM(adsm) for almost 8 years now. When the
system was first speced out, they did some cost analysis and decided
that the 3494 tape library with the 3590 tape drives were the best
solution for the lo
TSM Server 5.1.9.0 on AIX 5.2 ML-2
TSM Server 5.2 media on hand
We have outgrown our 3583 and 3575s, so I'm looking for a new tape
library. At first I though my only choices were another standalone
library like the 3583 or go with a frame system like the 3584. I have
problems with both approache
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anderson, Matt
>We're currently considering replacing our 2 very large AIX TSM
>servers with
>a large number (maybe 10 or so) of smaller, Linux based servers.
>The reason
>for the change is to reduce the impact of hardware failu
Matt,
I started using TSM fresh here in December 2003 on a Redhat Linux ES 2.1 kernel
2.4.9-e.27, on an IBM Intel x335 e-server. Have been running TSM server for Linux
5.2.2.2 with an IBM 3582 TapeLib (two LTO2/LTO1 fiber connected drives), a 7200 SAN,
with server fiber optic cards etc.
I'm b
Well normally offsite reclamation will use the onsite tapes as input. So
you normally don't checkin your offsite tapes for offsite reclamation - they
stay offsite and the process reads your onsite tapes.
I would check the activity log for other error messages.
-Original Message-
From: Mi
>Earlier on this morning we commenced a Space reclamation job but we being
>given multiple messages referring to different volume numbers, of the
>following type
>
>ANR1163W Offsite volume SPL500L1 still contains files
> which could not be moved.
>
>However after struggling fo
Thank you
"Mike Bantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
15/06/2004 16:40
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Space reclamation
"Offsite volume SPL500L1" is the main clue here - som
"Offsite volume SPL500L1" is the main clue here - some of your offsite
tapes need reclamation, but for fairly obvious reasons that reclamation
can't happen right now.
Check in those tapes to your library and the reclamation will start up for
'em, even if they're not being marked for vaultretr sta
Hey all,
We're currently considering replacing our 2 very large AIX TSM servers with
a large number (maybe 10 or so) of smaller, Linux based servers. The reason
for the change is to reduce the impact of hardware failure, allow for
database maintenance within a reasonable window and (less important
Earlier on this morning we commenced a Space reclamation job but we being
given multiple messages referring to different volume numbers, of the
following type
ANR1163W Offsite volume SPL500L1 still contains files
which could not be moved.
However after struggling for a litt
Hi,
Have been backing up our storage pools of late using LTO tapes in
our tape library IBM 3584. Was attempting to backup the storage pools
(diskpool and tapepool) to LTO2 tapes this morning (as part of a backup
schedule) but it was unsuccessful. The LTO2 tapes were labelled correctly
but
Thanks
Richard
Richard Sims wrote:
> Tim - See "Web Client, phantom sessions" in
> http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
> for a summary of our past findings on such sessions.
>
>Richard Sims
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard van Denzel
>Can anyone give met the error message description and so on
>for ANS0350E.
ANS0350E The current client configuration does not comply with the
value of DATAWRITEPATH or DATAREADPATH server option for
ANS0350E The client is configured for LAN-free operations and is not
allowed to send data directly to the server.
Explanation:
The client is configured for LAN-free operations, and the specified node
name has been configured on the server so that it can only send data
LAN-free. This error typically
Tim - See "Web Client, phantom sessions" in
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
for a summary of our past findings on such sessions.
Richard Sims
Hi,
Do a search for ANS0350E on www.google.ca
It's something related to a lan-free client configuration
Luc
Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-06-15 10:45 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL P
No, that is not the real issue. This is what I kept trying to explain to
IBM.
There is no communication failure, as far as I can see, other than the AIX
system saying the LM is not reponding in a timely fashion. When this
occurs, AIX says the box is offline. I can ping each other from both
ends,
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Storage Area Networks 5.2: ANS0350E
Technote
Problem
The TSM storage agent is installed on a W2K system and it's witnessing:
ANS0350E The client is configured for LAN-free operations and is not allowed
to send data directly to the server.
This means that a lanfre
Hi Listers,
Can anyone give met the error message description and so on for ANS0350E.
I've found one reference on www.ibm.com, but alas it's a locked entry and
my account hasn't been reset yet.
Regards,
Richard.
Hello everyone,
Can anyone tell me why would my TSM Server Admin ID shows up
in multiple sessions when I sign on to the a Tivoli Server? I know
I could just cancel them I'm just curious.
Thanks for any replies!
Sess N Comm. Sess Wait Bytes Bytes Sess Platform Client Name
number Met
Thanks to all for the pointers --
Del, the magic was your note about /EXCSERVER (along with getting the
resources for server one back on server one -- sigh).
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent:
** High Priority **
send an exact error message ...
if you can, use db2adutl to list active version backups exits in TSM from db2 and You
need to use same time stamp while restoring. Hope this helps.
muthyam
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/15/2004 9:57:07 AM >>>
At 03:36 AM 6/15/2004, you wrote:
>Hi
At 03:36 AM 6/15/2004, you wrote:
Hi
Please help, has anyone had a problem with restoring from tsm when
trying to restore a db2 database form TSM it returns saying the i/o error
inactive backup
Please helpurgent..
It would be helpful if you could post the exact error message(s) that you
ar
Hi
Please help, has anyone had a problem with restoring from tsm when
trying to restore a db2 database form TSM it returns saying the i/o error
inactive backup
Please helpurgent..
This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential and proprietary
33 matches
Mail list logo
