From: Eddie Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hey gang. I have an odd situation. I am running tsm version
> 5.1.6.3 on a
> windows 2000 compaq/hp dl580. When I do any activity on my
> tape libraries
> (i.e. reclaim, moves or migration) I receive and error that
> the library
> goes offline an
From: Mark Cini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We also want to look at backing up Macintosh
> design systems as well as laptops/PCs for power users.
One cautionary note: the current Mac client does not support a scheduler
service unless the machine is logged on with a root-equivalent user at
the t
Ik ben niet op kantoor vanaf 12-06-2003 tot 30-06-2003.
DISCLAIMER
Deze e-mail en alle daarbij meegezonden bijlagen zijn uitsluitend bestemd
voor de geadresseerde(n). Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is
niet toegestaan. Del
Thanks for all the good info so far. Here are some more details on our
environment:
We will initially be backing up 22 nodes, all of which will be a mix of
Windows NT and 2000 file servers. One will be SQLServer on W2K and one
will be Domino 6 on W2k. We also want to look at backing up Macintos
TSMers,
I've noticed that there has been some interest for TSM on Linux (on this
list and with customers that I've seen). Some customers are quite happy to
use it with the current supported drivers, other people are concerned that
the drivers are not current as they could be and would like to see
I have had the best luck with the AIX systems, they always work.
I prefer using UNIX as a server because of the flexibility for scripting and
control.
Linux x86 is not a viable platform because of the kernel limitations for the
device drivers package.
AIX has the best device coverage of the UNIX pl
Dwight / Wanda / David,
Your advice was accurate and matched what I thought I would have to do. I
was just scared of the risk so I was looking for alternatives.
But I did as y'all suggested. Backed up today's DB tape, then restored
Sunday's. Checked out all scratch tapes that had been used be
I am running TSM 5.1.6.2 on Windows 2000 Dell 4400 with about 55 GB per
night change 700 GB+ on weekends (TDP). This using the standard perc card
and a IBM 3584 w/ 4 LTO1 drives. This works with our environment.
But I think that everyone would agree that you should base your OS
decision on 1 in
We run TSM on AIX 5.1, using Gresham to control a 9310 with 9840 and 9940 drives. To do the restore we used this devconfig file, and when the server requested a mount, used EDT to mount the volume in the correct tape drive. Just change the parameters to fit your environment. Hope this helps.
/* D
Hey gang. I have an odd situation. I am running tsm version 5.1.6.3 on a
windows 2000 compaq/hp dl580. When I do any activity on my tape libraries
(i.e. reclaim, moves or migration) I receive and error that the library
goes offline and then the first drive will go offline then I get a message
th
How large of an envirnment are you going to back up?
I have about 200 nodes (AIX, NT/2000 & Netware) backing up about 200Gig a
night & am using an IBM M80 with 4 3590 E1A's (soon to be 6 H1A's)...
Bruce Kamp
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
I would say run the TSM server on AIX since u have it in house already.
W2K would be the next choice with the AS/400 being last on the list for
sure.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Cell (831) 595-
Hello all.
We are in the process of ditching our current BackupExec/ArcServe setup in
favor of a central TSM environment. We have decided to expand our
existing 3494 tape library (additional frame w/ 2 3590 drives, SCSI) but
haven't selected the hardware/operating system for the TSM server. Thes
Hi TSMers!
The whitepaper
(http://www-1.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100254)
states as one of the possible solutions to the DB growth driven by Archives
to:
"Unconvert the Node and then Convert the Node. This will force the node to
use the new table structure within the
Hi,
Thanks for Zlatko Krastev's information.
I found the reason of the problem ANS4045W. For two servers launched two same commands
to retrieve a same file from tape at the same time, sowehow it impacted the tapes'
data.
Appreciate,
Tao Jiang
Coban Research & Technologies
www.cobantech.com
>Long story.we need to find a specific fileset for a TSM Server upgrade.
>No where on the FTP site
>(ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management) or
>web-sites does it seem available. The fileset needed is:
>tivoli.tsm.devices.aix43.rte 4.2.0.0. We need this to upgrade our
Yep, you are correct. This change went into 5.1.5. We didn't have an APAR
on it, which is why I didn't mention one before, and I couldn't recollect
when the change was made. But since you asked, I looked a little deeper
and found out that this is indeed the case. So yes, you need to be at
5.1.6 (a
Brief answer:
If you know which tapes had this data AND you know those
tapes haven't been reused, then you can do this. You dont' need both
onsite and offsite tapes, if either one exists, that will be sufficient.
Basically make a DB backup now. Then restore your system from
the DB backup tape t
Hello all,
Long story.we need to find a specific fileset for a TSM Server upgrade.
No where on the FTP site
(ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management) or
web-sites does it seem available. The fileset needed is:
tivoli.tsm.devices.aix43.rte 4.2.0.0. We need this to upgr
Our sharks have mod 3 and mod 9 volumes with dynamic PAV switching active. I
am using 36 of the mod 9s with TSM for parts of the DB, log and pools. The
worst response I have seen was 8ms on our old 'E20' series shark. The
'gotcha' has been that the older versions of TSM would not let you use a
data
Ok I wasn't dreaming! This is what I saw describing changes for 5.1.5:
Ignore NTFS compression attribute
During an incremental backup, if the only change to a file is the
compression attribute, the client will send the attribute update to the
Storage Manager server without backing up the entire co
We have MANY win2k systems at SP2 and some at SP3 that back up system files
fine with 4.2.0.0 client.
But, some mysteriously develop the illness you describe! We have had 5 win2K
systems at SP3 that will back up everything BUT system files.
I never figured out exactly what the problem is, but I f
Client 5.1.6.0, Win 2k sp1, IE 6 sp1.
I turned off the Sun Java because it caused some other problems and my web
client still works.
IE6 - tools - internet options - advanced - scroll down about half way and
you should find the option for java (sun).
-Original Message-
From: Tab Trepagnier
I had the same problem when I had to put the TDP on a new Server. The way I resolved
the issue was to uninstall the 5.1.5 TDP, Install the Base TDP version 2.2 and then
upgrade to 5.1.5.
That should fix it.
Rajesh Oak
Enterprise Storage Admin
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
--
- Ori
Everyone,
We're on TSM server for Solaris 5.1.5.1 and have our database volumes on
Clariion disk as a raw volume. Is there a TSM limitation to the number of
characters in the naming convention? For example, we have a db volume on
/dev/rdsk/c1t60020F2065A83E567A1F000CE26Ad0s0 which totals 49 ch
Hi Joni,
I'm living the same kind of experience as yours. TSM version 5.1.6.2,
but on AIX platform ! I can use the web GUI, but if I have to push on
"stop" button in my favorite browser for any reason, before getting a
response from TSM server (sometimes have to do it for long SQL queries),
this l
If warranted, you can momentarily toggle the active tape volume status
from READWrite to READOnly, then back, to cause the multiple sessions
to each get their own output volumes.
Richard Sims, BU
Thanks Geoff. We'd much rather have the session wait during backups
than during restore so we'll leave collocation on and ignore the
MediaW.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/11/03 10:32AM >>>
David,
We have had these same types of problems when collocation is set to
yes.
Try turning it off and ru
Hi again everyone!
I just went to logon to the web admin gui and I make it as far as the main
screen, but I can't do anything and it just sits there saying it is waiting
to download 6 more pictures. Since the tsm server is on os/390 I can go
into the jes log and issue commands and see what is goi
I ran into a similar situation recently. We just recently upgraded to
v5.1.x and had no knowledge of the Q PATH command. It appears that when
drives go offline in v5.x due to a hardware problem their path can go
offline as well. I corrected the problem by doing an update path command.
Helpful c
David,
We have had these same types of problems when collocation is set to yes.
Try turning it off and running your backup again, I bet you will see it pick
up more drives.
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:27 AM
To
Yes, there are adequate scratch volumes and drives and paths are
online.
Thanks,
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/10/03 03:48PM >>>
>Any ideas why a tape is not being mounted?
This may not be the issue, but is the destination stgpool configured
with
an adequate number of scratch volumes allowed (
Collocation is set YES. Can collocation not go to multiple tapes?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/10/03 03:44PM >>>
David,
Have you verified that collocation is set to NO on the tape storage
pool
that this client is backing up to.
Geoff Raymer
EDS - Tulsa BUR and Leveraged Storage
MS 326
4000 N. Mingo
Agreed. Been there, done that before-
Since your tapes are in PENDING status, they haven't been written over
(which is what PENDING is for.)
So if you roll your DB back, they will be readable.
'Course, you gotta either take your system down, or have a "test" TSM server
to do it with.
Grab yourse
You could
identify some known scratch tapes NOW and in the past when that data
existed
roll the environment back to when the deleted data existed
export that filespace
roll the environment back to current
import the filespace
whew...
but will work... (famous last wo
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:34:20 -0400
Douglas Currell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible for multiple TCPPorts to be setup on
> the same server? I would like all clients to connect
> via the default, 1500, except for one other client
> that I would use to connect via any other port number.
TSM Server 5.1.6.5 on AIX 4.3.3 ML-11
While cleaning up old data in our TSM system, we deleted a filespace from
which a year-end snapshot had been taken. Upon the deletion of the
filespace, TSM notified us that both the primary tape and the copy tape
had toggled to "pending" status. This occurre
Zlatko,
For Exchange, you will not get any benefit by binding
the meta objects to a disk only storage pool because
there is no data stored with the meta object.
In fact, with Exchange, since all of the objects
created during a backup are part of the same
transaction, the objects will need to have
Is it possible for multiple TCPPorts to be setup on
the same server? I would like all clients to connect
via the default, 1500, except for one other client
that I would use to connect via any other port number.
__
Post your free a
Rainer Tammer wrote:
I see a very big problem in this disk storage pools.
If you have an surge on your electricity network you
can potentially loos all your data including the backup !!
That is why the industry has developed UPS, RAID and auto-retracting
disk heads among other things.
And there is
generally speaking,
a disk subsystem represents a low granular data store.
Inspite of Raid and redundant power supplies,
you still have a single point of failure,
it can fail as a whole due to surge, firmeware or cabling error
or due to anything alse.
In this case you will loose all data.
Assumi
>I get this ANS1009W error too:
>
>10.06.2003 09:31:07 ANS1009W An error occurred processing the operating =
>system include/exclude statements.
>The error was detected while processing: hivelist: no string data.
>
>my configuration:
> server w2ksp3 tsm 4.2.3.4
> client w2ksp3 cluster tsm baclien
Henrik,
I have had this same problem with the 5.1.0.1 client version. Backups
running fine then all of a sudden the backups on the System Objects will not
complete with the same problem you are describing.
My immediate resolution was to upgrade the client to 5.1.5.9, which may not
be suitable to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:19:10AM -0400, Richard Sims wrote:
> The ANS1315E message refers to a problem in the server which caused
> the data transfer to fail; so check your server Activity Log for the
> underlying issue. The later ANS1069E message is misleading in this
I did check but found no
Hi,
I have a w2k sp3 client with TSM 4.2.2.0. TSM server is 4.1.3.0.
During backupwindow my backup schedule starts and completes and fails with
RC=4. Then the schedule start to loop i.e restart the schedule during
backup window like 30 times and do a backup..each time.
I can backup everythin
* (100 - ) =
In your case this equation would mean that you have compressed over 1.5 TB
with compression ratio over 99.5% (to have TSM report is as 100%) down to
reported 7.81 GB. A read rate of 3.25 GB/s (1.5 TB divided by 8 minutes)
seems unrealistic so I would guess the compression is indeed
>Yesterday I started an image backup of one of the filesystems.
>
>Unfortunately I did get an error:
>
>Backup Image Function Invoked.
>
>ANS1315E (RC15) Unexpected Retry request
>ANS1424W Retrying failed image operation for volume /news/bufory2.
>ANS1228E Sending of object '/news/bufory2' failed
Hi,
yes that is possible, register the admin and than 'grant authority admin
class=node authority=access'
I'm not sure about 4.1 though, but 4.2 and higher it works
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Markus Veit
Dell,
we should not do this or there would be no benefit of doing so? Are there
any known issues (like transaction sending to more than one stgpool) if
these zero-lenght object are bound to different class?
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist St
we would like to establish an admin for our hotline-department with only
restoreauthority.
is it possible in tsm 4.1 on os/390 ?
this admin should only be able to restore to the original destination, for example to
the win/nt-client,
not to his own workstation !
thanks for any help
regards
Mi
Hi everybody,
My environment is the following:
TSM server 5.1.6.4 on AIX5.1 32bit
DB2 EEE 7.2 on AIX 5.132 bit
TSM client 5.1.5.15 and API on AIX5.1 32bit
I'm configuring the online backup of DB2 towards TSM.
The following variables were added to the .profile of root and the instance owner:
Sam,
We do not currently use our ESS for larger than model 3s
We define every linear data set for both storage pool and database volumes to
use 100%
of a model 3.
We also use file volumes for database snapshot and for backupsets. These are
defined at 2gb.
We do not have much of an issue with devic
Hello.
Yesterday I started an image backup of one of the filesystems.
Unfortunately I did get an error:
Backup Image Function Invoked.
ANS1315E (RC15) Unexpected Retry request
ANS1424W Retrying failed image operation for volume /news/bufory2.
ANS1228E Sending of object '/news/bufory2' failed
A
hi!
I get this ANS1009W error too:
10.06.2003 09:31:07 ANS1009W An error occurred processing the operating system
include/exclude statements.
The error was detected while processing: hivelist: no string data.
my configuration:
server w2ksp3 tsm 4.2.3.4
client w2ksp3 cluster tsm baclient 5.1
54 matches
Mail list logo
