You will probably need the nested form of the query, something like...
select a.volume_name from volumeusage where blah blah blah and -
a.volumn_name in (select b.volume_name from volumes where -
last_write_date>current date - 60 day)
We are requesting an en
For your consideration - a residency in San Jose to update the very popular
redbooks, "TSM Concepts", and "Getting Started with TSM: A Practical
Implementation Guide"
Residency Announcement: TI-A303 Tivoli Storage Management Concepts,
Getting Started with TSM - Update
Benefits to Resident: Resid
> Perhaps a command line switch to
> eliminate the header and trailer...
Watch for an option to display just the data in an upcoming release.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e
>My 3494 is filled with 3590E carts.
Well, you have something I've never seen... I know about 3590J tapes, and
3590K tapes, but never seen a 3590E tape. ;-)
>If I were to start introducing the longer format carts into my system,
>would TSM use them interchangeably with the old ones, i.e., would
If your 3590 drives have the green 2x sticker on the back of them (open the
cabinet and look), they can support K cartridges. 3590H drives can support
K-Carts. The K carts have a different knotch configuration than the J
cartridges. There is no issue with having a mixed bag except it throws off
I know but my customer want to do that. In fact, he bought two new servers,
one with W2K and one with linux, and planned to install TSM on the linux
server, but it is so complicated that we decided to install it on the W2K
server. And we have 200 Gb on the Linux Server and 70 Gb on W2K So we would
I have done a significant amount of testing and have quite a lot of
practical experience with what I will refer to as the Big Three tape
technologies:
AIT3
LTO1
SDLT320
Of the three, I know AIT the best. It's always good to know where someone
sits before they tell you where they stand.
In a TSM
We were getting a fair amount of "36 errors" on our 3584 and they
corresponded to I/O errors I was seeing in TSM. After talking to IBM and
our CE, we wound up updating our library firmware to 3060 and (knock on
wood) we haven't seen any errors since.
Library 3584
4 fiber attached LTO drives
Libra
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:05PM -0500, Remeta, Mark wrote:
>> It doesn't matter how you use it. Forcing TSM to work its I/O at network
>> speeds when it is designed to work at bus speeds will show badly. You'll
>> be disappointed.
> I agree.. besides that's what off-site copy pools are for!
I h
Please feel free to point me to the documentation if I've overlooked
something here, but I'm running into a brick wall...
Client version 5.1.5.5
Client OS - AIX 5.1 ML 02
Server version 5.1.5.4
Server OS - AIX 5.1 ML 02
I've been asked to produce a list of all current
Hi Zlatko,
I understand your and everyone else's frustration. When it comes to the
TSM product code, ADSM-L is one of the best places to be because your
message gets to people who write the code. In a similar fashion, the
feedback mechanism that I mentioned yesterday will enable your message
about
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
>>Why would you want to do this? Disk (particularly local
>>disk) is cheap
>>these days. The lag resultant from Windows drive mappings or
>>(shudder!) NFS mounts will greatly slow your throughput.
From: Emil S. Hansen [mailto:[
A "workaround" is to create a macro file of the command(s) you want, and
redirect each of them to a file. Them run DSMADMC with MACRO and
the results will be without the headers. I like to use -TAB and -ITEMCOMMIT
options. like this:
Q ACT BEGINT=-01:00 > QACT.TXT
and you'll get your output, ta
My 3494 is filled with 3590E carts. If I were to use 3590K carts, my robot
wouldn't be so filled. This is the current definition of the DEVC TAPE:
Device Class Name: TAPE
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 8
Device Type: 3590
Format:
This morning I've seen email asking us to lay off IBM. Does anyone have any
further experience with any level of 5.1.6 that can convince anyone it's
stable?
Is anyone on 5.1.5x satified with that delivery?
Is anyone who is on 5.1.6.0 satisfied with the delivery?
Is anyone on 5.1.6.1 satisfied wit
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
> Why would you want to do this? Disk (particularly local disk) is cheap
> these days. The lag resultant from Windows drive mappings or (shudder!)
> NFS mounts will greatly slow your throughput.
Offsite storage?
--
Best Regards
Emil
Hi,
I upgraded approx 3-4 weeks ago from 4.2.x to 5.1.6.0. (AIX 433 server) I had
intermittently the node table access crashes everyone else did. IBM thought that had
been fixed, and worked very diligently with me to get core dumps, and information to
discover the problem. They called me shortl
I would be very curious to hear what type of reliability problems you have
seen with LTO. I have posted here before, but we have been experiencing
an incredibly high number of read errors with our 3584 LTO library. We
regularly see errors when trying to restore data from tapes. We have been
aud
Philip,
Attention for the parameter "OPTIONS"
The configuration file " progra~1\tivoli\tsm\tdpsql\sqlfull.cmd " it must be placed in
OBJECTS ... OK!
02/18/2003 02:37:35 Schedule Name: ENTERPRISE_SQL_BACKUP
02/18/2003 02:37:3
Just upgraded our [AIX433 ML10] TSM Server from 415 to 5162 yesterday. No problems to
speak of so far and the upgrade went suprisingly smooth.
Thanks;
Theresa
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/18/03 10:06AM >>>
This morning I've seen email asking us to lay off IBM. Does anyone have any
further experie
Farren,
I'm not sure exactly how the TSM database internals work, but typically a
database cache is populated with "cache prefetch." This isn't _exactly_
correct, but it'll do conceptually. The db goes to read one row (check a
file for expiration). That one db row request loads one or more
bloc
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelly J. Lipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tape Reliability Recommendations
>
> As for reliability. That turns out to be a very mixed bag.
<...snip...>
> For instance,
> we hav
Philip,
Attention for the parameter "OPTIONS"
The configuration file " progra~1\tivoli\tsm\tdpsql\sqlfull.cmd " it must be placed in
OBJECTS ... OK!
02/18/2003 02:37:35 Schedule Name: ENTERPRISE_SQL_BACKUP
02/18/2003 02:37:3
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> IBM has announced a FAQ lookup, instant messaging group, and
> a lot of other functions to help assist people.
> http://community.ngi.ibm.com/ How will this affect the
> participation of the many IBM people who participate in these lists?
We'll se
Philip,
What does your TSM Server schedule definition look like?
Is the SQLFULL.CMD being executed at all?
I would bet that it isn't.
Take a closer look at the schedule definition to
see if there is a problem with it. One example,
I have seen is that if there is a space in the
path name to the SQ
NDMP backups will go directly to dedicated tape drives .
Stefan Holzwarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/18/2003 03:17 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:AW: Nd
I'm sure being a TSM developer isn't much fun these days - I can sympathize
with them a bit from the aspect of some things being out of their control.
I have been writing some scripts for TSM this morning, and I'm in a bit of a
bad mood - hence the snipe at the developers.
Now that I'm venting up
Hi Mark,
You are probably suffering from so called "log pinning" symptom. To make
it short : log is working on a circular basis, and can only be freed if
all transactions that where written into it are commited to TSM DB. If
not done, you reach a point where the log bites it's own tail : older
rec
I am having trouble getting the SQL TDP v2.2.1 to run with the scheduler.
Here is the system description:
Both the TSM server and the SQL server are running Windows 2000 with SP3.
The SQL server is running SQL 2000 patched to SP3.
TSM server version 4.2.1.12
TSM BAClient version 4.2.2.8
TSM Tivol
I have seen this exact same problem. Running 5.1.1.0 server and 5.1.1.0
client. W2K platform. I have had this problem for weeks and weeks
I could not figure it out either..
Presumably a bug??
-Original Message-
From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2003 13
>I'm a little confused about the cache hit ratio information. If I run
>expiration on a database, surely the TSM server has to trawl through the
>entire thing on disk as it does not already reside in the buffer. So how
>would I expect to see hit ratios of 99% or higher. I won't go into details
>her
For you folks that patch your TSM server frequently (like the individual
from Oxford University who upgraded from some version to 5.1.6.0 on Feb3,
then to 5.1.6.1 on Feb7, and now planning to upgrade to 5.1.6.2 within a
couple weeks), how many of you have Storage Agent nodes?
I am still on 4.2.1.7
I am assuming that these disk vols are nfs mounted over some of the
hosts systems in your environment . I use to backup these disks vols
locally from the server where it is mounted .There is a option to backup
nfs mounted fliesystems .
Yes - $4500 per NDMP license .
Thanks & regards .
Sh
IBM has announced a FAQ lookup, instant messaging group, and a lot of
other functions to help assist people.
http://community.ngi.ibm.com/
How will this affect the participation of the many IBM people who
participate in these lists?
Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain
Good afternoon all TSMers.
I'm a little confused about the cache hit ratio information. If I run
expiration on a database, surely the TSM server has to trawl through the
entire thing on disk as it does not already reside in the buffer. So how
would I expect to see hit ratios of 99% or higher. I wo
In the spirit of sharing experiences:
> Is anyone who is on 5.1.6.0 satisfied with the delivery?
We found strange issues at 5160 upgrade time; we ran one server for a
few days at 5160 (from 3 February) which was quite satisfactory but
were advised by support to go to 5161 ...
> Is anyone on 5.1.
From: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Could someone help me with that one : I get a client node
> (win2k) for which TSM reports following message every night :
>
> 02/18/03 03:29:01 ANR2576W An attempt was made to update an
> event record for a scheduled operation which has alread
From: GUILLAUMONT Etienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool
> on a remote machine without installing TSM on it. Typically,
> what I wan't to do is to use space on a remote server to have
> a disk or a file storage pool on it. I tried with
From: Emil S. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> My TSM server is version 4.1.5 running on AIX. I know it
> isn't supported, but it is danm stable.
>
> Now I want to install TSM for Mail, Notes Edittion which I
> think is the old "TDP for Domino v. 1.1.2". Does any one know
> if it is possibl
Hello
One gig is too small. I've had the same problem, when slow clients backed up
alot of data it took several hours and the log began filling up.
Regards
Niklas
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hayden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 18 februari 2003 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Hi all you TSMers out there
I have a vague memory question here. I'm running TSM on a Solaris 2.7
machine and what I want to know is, when I start the TSM server, does it
automatically grab a chunk of the free memory regardless of what it is
doing at the time.
Thanks
Farren Minns
John Wiley & S
And for my 2 cents worth, I see this as a TSM management and not development
problem.
There seems to be no regression test suite, and no change control/revision
control process.
Tom Kauffman
NIBCO, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Febr
Hi Etienne,
it is easy. I suppose you have a server with disk capacity, which you want
use for TSM to store data. I do not know if that remote machine is Windows
or Unix system. It is possible to use both of them (I actually worked only
with Windows system but with NFS in Unix it should be also pos
Since I've received no response from the list, I decided to spend a
day reading through both the TSM documentation on NDMP and the
documentation on NDMP itself. I had thought that NDMP was just a backup
protocol that TSM could support. It is not. It is a complete backup
system itself. It requires t
Just my opinion, but based on the bug releases of late, they are doing a
pretty good bagging job on their own.
Etienne,
Probably not. I tried this as well, and ultimately had to back down to RH
7.2 with a kernel upgrade to get things working.
The TSMSCSI modules appear to be VERY fussy about loading into *exactly*
the kernel specified. Once you meet the requirements, however, it seems
to work pretty wel
Nicolas,
Could you provide us a little bit more details on what you're willing to
do, and on your knowledge of TSM and AIX, that we have a better idea of
what you're trying to achive and the means to do it ?
TIA.
Arnaud
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Arnaud Brion, Pa
Hi list !
Could someone help me with that one : I get a client node (win2k) for
which TSM reports following message every night :
02/18/03 03:29:01 ANR2576W An attempt was made to update an event record
for a scheduled operation which has already been executed - multiple
client schedulers may be
Hello list.
My TSM server is version 4.1.5 running on AIX. I know it isn't
supported, but it is danm stable.
Now I want to install TSM for Mail, Notes Edittion which I think is the
old "TDP for Domino v. 1.1.2". Does any one know if it is possible to
run it with my old server?
My plan is to inst
Ing. Jozef Zatko,
Can you share the steps to achieve this remote storage pool.
Thanks,
chandrasekhar
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne,
you can use
Hi Etienne,
you can use remote disks for file device class. I am not sure about 5.1
version, but I did this on 4.2 version and it worked fine.
I had problems with using disk device class on remote disks, but file
device class worked for me.
You can even use UNC names for file volumes (it is better
Hello,
I tried to install TSM 5.1.5 server on Linux but I have a problem because
my level is 7.3 red hat with a 2.4.18.24 kernel and for the devices, TSM
requires an older kernel. Is there any possibility to have TSM work on my
linux level ?
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RGB Te
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool on a remote
machine without installing TSM on it. Typically, what I wan't to do is to
use space on a remote server to have a disk or a file storage pool on it. I
tried with a file device class and it allows only local disks. A di
I want to put the ndmp datastream on diskpools (type file or disk), but i
don't know whether it's possible.
Regards
Stefan holzwarth
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Februar 2003 20:43
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re
54 matches
Mail list logo
