Build levels are not shown on the patches. You are at 4.2.1.0 Patch Level.
You actually installed 4.2.1.0 not 4.2.0.0, right. It is highly recommened
to put on at least patch 4.2.1.20 or higher. 4.2.1.30 is the current one.
Note that patches are not released on CD. You have to load them down f
Are you doing any kind of backup that may involve management class
rebinding? There is an open APAR for lanfree backups when rebinding is
performed. This APAR will be fixed in TSM 4.2.2.0.
At 05:12 PM 3/27/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>i've this environment server tivoli win2k 4.2.1.0, tsm c
I'm running 4.2.1.9 and the MMC reports 4.2.1.9220 . The property page
reports Version 4, Release 2, Level, Fix 9, Build 4... If you installed 4.2
without installing any patches of PTF's your at fix level 0.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Al Narzisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tues
Hello,
We are looking to use TSM to backup over fibre attached client to a STK
Powderhorn controlled by ACSLS.
The TSM server is on a solaris server and the ACSLS is a separate solaris
server. What do I need on my TSM server to be able to communicate to the
ACSLS server? I see there is LibAttach
For example, dsmserv.exe and adsmdll.dll is shown at 4.2.1.69?
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Raibeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Confused Over W2K Maintenance Level
> You don't say which TSM component you are interes
W2K Server 4.2:
The properties page for adsmdll.dll says Version:4 Release:2 Level:1 Fix:0
Build:69? When I start TSM from the command line, it say Version 4,
Release 2, Level 1.0. Help on the MMC does not tell me version and release
information. What does the build level refer to? And how ca
Your Tivoli Support Team should be able to answer this question at least in
AIX processor terms. This is what I think:
(1) AIX P660 4 processor with 2GB memory (equivalent) (2) if you
want to have good capacity.
What kind of database size do you have? That is a key missing sizing
elemen
You don't say which TSM component you are interested in. I understand you
are using the TSM server's MMC facility to display TSM component version
info, but which component's version info are you asking about?
>> Can anybody tell me how I can find what PTF level reflects what
maintenance number?
We start the scheduler from the inittab with the respawn parm -
example:
adsm::respawn:/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1
#Start the client schedule
This works great for us.
James
> -Original Message-
> From: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Curtis,
Try setting summaryretention to 1, stop the server, change system date to 2
days later than the bad date, start dsmserv, ACCEPT DATE -- all of this with
sessions and schedules disabled, to prevent further records; after purge
processing, stop the server, reset system date, start dsmserv,
This is an *excellent*, best practices, suggestion... works fine, runs a
long time!
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Molero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:42 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Availability
> Hi,
>
> the best solution is 4 loops of 8 d
Hi Dennis,
Your idea is SUPERB !!
Thanks ...
Sumitro.
>From: Dennis Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Need Help Controlling Script Output, Field Lengths
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:16:21 -0600
>
>Unless you wan
Running W2K 4.2, when looking at the Tivoli MMC version information, TSM reports
4.2.1.69 and 4.2.1.68. When I check the Tivoli support web page the highest
maintenance level I see is 4.2.1.20.
Can anybody tell me how I can find what PTF level reflects what maintenance number?
And, what is
so will the new client version and patch work with my server version
(3.1.2.9)?
thanks!
alex
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, John Bremer wrote:
> looks like a 4.1.2.20 version at
> http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/clients.html#xp
>
> At 09:28 AM 4/1/02 -0600, Alexander Lazarevich wrote:
> >is the
You need client version V4.2.1.20 for Windows XP support.
Alexander Lazarevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/01/2002 10:28 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:win
Tivoli did not officially support the XP Client until 4.2.1 and a patch
level on top of it.
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: windows XP client?
is there a windows XP client that
You might try... disabling your various commmethods so sessions can't
start/stop and disable your scheduler for your processes so nothing gets
logged to the summary table during this process. Then set your system time
to 2 months after the bad record, make sure that record expires off, set the
ti
Hi
We are moving TSM off of our IBM mainframe to a SUN Solaris environment
and would like feedback regarding the model/size of the SUN boxes other shops
are using to run TSM.
Our site:
We're currently running an IBM 9121 mainframe configured with two LPARs
running VM/ESA. We have about 4000 TSM
Zoltan, The patches are at
service2.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches/server/MVS-OS390
Hope this helps,
Bill
At 11:57 AM 4/1/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Anyone got a clue where the OS390 TSM server patches have gone ?
>
>The link from Tivoli goes to:
>ftp://service.boulder.
looks like a 4.1.2.20 version at
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/clients.html#xp
At 09:28 AM 4/1/02 -0600, Alexander Lazarevich wrote:
>is there a windows XP client that works okay? ive been trying to use v3 r1
>level 0.8 on XP and it causes a lot of program errors. (memory access
>vilo
Anyone got a clue where the OS390 TSM server patches have gone ?
The link from Tivoli goes to:
ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/server/v4r2/MVS-OS390/
but it says it can't find them.
Also, my docs say to go to service2.boulder.ibm.com/storage but th
is there a windows XP client that works okay? ive been trying to use v3 r1
level 0.8 on XP and it causes a lot of program errors. (memory access
viloation when i exit the program, etc.) adsm can run and backup and
restore, but all the errors make me nervous. is there a newer version for
XP clients
We have a short article and a couple of scripts that will help you clean up
TSM query output so you can work on it with grep / awk / spreadsheets, etc.
See
http://www.servergraph.com/techtip.shtml
Mr. Lindsay Morris
CEO
Applied System Design
www.servergraph.com
859-2
I am in the process of testing Adstar/Tivoli for our enterprise backup
solution for NetWare. I started using the Tivoli client in the beginning of
March on two servers. One server is NW5.0 Sp6a the other NW5.1 Sp2a. We are
only backing up the user data at this time (~90 gig of user data on each
s
We also have a 3583 LTO with 60 cartridges (advertised) capacity plus 12 I/O
slots and have seen this multiple times before.
If you call Tivoli or IBM hardware support, their answer is to shut
everything down and restart. On initialization the system will correct
itself, and it does.
The problem
Hi,
Today IBM guy solved the problem by changing barcode label of magazine.
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01.04.2002 17:37
Please respond to ADSM-L
To: [EMAIL
Ike,
I got it to work with some help from Dennis Glover. He sent me an
example of something that worked. The big difference was that the -COMMA
option MUST BE LISTED BEFORE THE MACRO option. So
DSMADMC -ID=x -PA=x -COMMA MACRO DD:D2works fine but
DSMADMC -ID=x -PA=
One thing to note about TDPO_AVG_SIZE when using TDP for Oracle 2.2, and
more importantly when using TDP for Oracle 2.2 with Oracle 8i or greater
is that we no longer require the use of TDPO_AVG_SIZE. It used to be that
Oracle (versions prior to 8i) did not send the size of the backup to TDP
for O
TSMers,
I recently upgraded a Windows NT 4.0 SP6 file server from TSM client 4.1.0
to 4.1.3. After the upgrade I began receiving these messages in the
dsmerror.log. It appears the registry is backing up fine, but these errors
appear on every scheduled backup. Has anyone seen these errors befor
Hi Goeff,
there are many things that you can do, depending on what you want.
However, I would not be so concerned about an adapter failing, failing disks are much
more common.
Here are some things to do/consider:
1. put each adapter on a separate PCI bus.
2. balance the disks over the adapter
Hi,
the best solution is 4 loops of 8 disks, in addition
you can place the db the db mirror the log and the log
mirror in each one of the 4 virtual disk. Also you can
define a raid 0 for the disks, and the db and tsm log
mirrors must be tsm mirror.
--- "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
es
Hi,
you can run all commands in a script, then you can run
the commands one per one. In addicion, you should see
the options movebatchsize ( 1000) and movesizethresh
(500), this options improve the performance in process
like migration , backup stg, reclamations,etc..
--- "Dearman, Richard" <[EMA
Hi,
I have a 3583 LTO library with 60 cartridges capacity plus 12 I/O slots.
Today, when I try to check-in 6 new cartridges to my library that has 54
cartridges currently in it,
TSM responded that the library is FULL. But when i go to library screen and
look at
system info, it says that 6
33 matches
Mail list logo
