Hello,
try to use the 4.1.2.99 client (patch directory on the ftp server).
The 4.1.1.0 client is also working.
bye
rainer tammer
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:59:13 +0200, Markus Brotzki wrote:
>Hi,
>
>i have a problem to backup files with german umlaute, under Suse Linux
>7.1 with adsm client 4.1.2.
Hi:
Can I use CA-unicenter TNG to manage TSM via SNMP ?
Is any one know where i can find some documentation regarding this ?
Michael Hsu
> Maybe because copypool tapes are reclaimed under a single
> process. Where as
> primary pool volumes are reclaimed 1 volume at a time. Each
> its own process.
No, that's not it - my copypool reclaim processes just don't show up at all.
--
Lesley Walker
Unix Engineering, EDS New Zealand
[EMAIL
Je serai absent(e) du 09.07.2001 jusqu'au 29.07.2001.
En cas d'urgence, veuillez contacter M.Roger Viret qui me contactera en cas
de besoin.
Mon remplaçant est M. Massimo Galizia et est atteignable au 021 313 78 04
(079 250 85 73)
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 23:00:21 +0100, you wrote:
>My tape naming system is tap001..2..3 etc
>
>My server keeps requesting me to load a tape DBBK.1 RW in the drive.
>
>Having labeled the tapes personally, I know I never labeled one with that
>name
Many more details needed:
OS and TSM levels
Type of
Hi All
My tape naming system is tap001..2..3 etc
My server keeps requesting me to load a tape DBBK.1 RW in the drive.
Having labeled the tapes personally, I know I never labeled one with that
name
Any ideas?
Cheers
John
>Is there a command out there will tell me that I can delete a 3490
>tape by knowing that all the data on the older 3490 tape exists on a
>3590E offsite tape??
Mark - By virtue of having done a Backup Stgpool to the 3590 pool and having
it say that it did everything, that should be your as
>My archive takes two hours to finish and every day I get errors in my
>dsmerror.log. I would like fix this condition , so only errors are
>reported to dsmerror.log. This is the only schedule that this happens with,
>I believe this is caused by the Timeout of the session that reports the
>statis
Why can't you do a MOVE DATA from the old storage pool to the new storage pool,
assuming you have colocation on in the old storage pool?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/06/01 03:55PM >>>
Thanks... I have the domains setup for separate storage pools (357pool's and
copy pools), however they all go the sa
Great question. Specifically, I'd like to know how much journal based
backups reduce the millions-of-little-files problem, i.e., TSM client spends
all its time walking a huge directory tree, only to discover that there's
little or nothing to back up.
(Of course, this problem can occur with Unix
>Is there any place I can still get the ADSM 3.1.0.6 client for AIX 4.1?
Sure...even the v2 clients (!), at:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tivolieoc.html
Richard Sims, BU
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:21:44 +0200, you wrote:
>I have had backup failure on one particular Windows 2000 server running a TSM
>client 41212. The errors began after SP 2 installation and have to do with RSM.
>Backup fails completely. Has anyone come across the same problem?
This has little to do wi
Hello,
A year ago we switched from 3490 tapes to 3590E tapes. I have alot of
tapes in a copypool made up of older 3490 tapes. All the local tapes
are 3590E tapes. I moved all the data from local 3490 tapes onto
3590E tapes.
I have been copying the 3590E tapes to a new copypool of 3590E tapes
and
Steve,
There are several approaches to accomplish differing retention requirements
as your customer desires. The first, maybe most obvious is the one you
proposed... multiple TSM clients for each retention req., for example,
NODE, NODE-WEEKLY, NODE-MONTHLY. This of course gobbles up client lice
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:02:59 -0500, you wrote:
>Basically, I want to do a Q VOLUME and look for any tapes that are below 40%
>utilized and then compare the results to a Q LIBV 3575LIB command. If I get
>a hit in both queries, I want to know the tape number. Any suggestions?
Try this:
select vo
15 matches
Mail list logo
