What's VGA. Is that something like a typewriter.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Lori Simcox wrote:
> Just a quick survery - how many people run TSM on machines using VGA
> monitors?
>
> Thanks,
> Lori
>
> ---
> Lori Simcox
> TSM Clie
--- Lori Simcox wrote:
Lori Simcox
TSM Client Development
--- end of quote ---
Ack, didn't see your signature : )
Forget my response.
--- You wrote:
Just a quick survery - how many people run TSM on machines using VGA
monitors?
--- end of quote ---
Clients or Servers?
I can answer for servers, and we use a console for every one.
Steve Cochran
Dartmouth College
Just a quick survery - how many people run TSM on machines using VGA
monitors?
Thanks,
Lori
---
Lori Simcox
TSM Client Development
San Jose, CA
---
I am not at liberty to divulge details about future product plans, but if
were, I might say that Office 2000 support could be coming in the
not-too-distant future. ;-)
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Tivoli Systems
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The only d
When the TSM Server software for AIX is installed, it rolls out a directory
path of /usr/tivoli/tsm/...
Is it safe to change this, or must the directory paths and names be kept
intact?
We are about to move TSM onto new disk, and the system administrators have
this idea of moving TSM into a differe
Greetings all,
The latest ODBC driver for Win32 that I can find is for 4.1.2.12. Its
"readme" states that the only MS Office apps it works with are the '97
versions. Now that Microsoft has come out with its second release since
then (2000, now XP)...
Has anybody heard when Tivoli will update t
I will be out of the office from 06/22/2001 until 06/27/2001.
---
This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions
Health Services Corporation and are intended only for the addressee(s).
T
Thanks guys for the info...that's exactly what I needed! Phil, stop by and see us
sometime at Information Systems if you ever make it back this way!
Thanks again,
Kelli Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chesterfield County, VA
>>> "Ford, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/22/01 03:16PM >>>
Hi Kelli - I us
Hi Kelli - I use to live in Chesterfield County a long time ago (left in
1962), by the dam (Bolder Dam in I remember right) on the James river on
Cherokee road. I wish we had that place now.
In the include/exclude file you can tie a set of files/file to a management
class. Each management clas
Need more info on your specifics, but if I understand what you're after the answer is
probably Yes.
If you have say an NT server with MSSQL databases you can do this. The sqlfull.cmd as
supplied can be made into 2 (or more) .cmd's and each specify which databases it is
backing up and each can
If I have one physical server with 2 separate databases on this one physical server,
can I have two separate versioning criteria? i.e. Database 1 with 6 versions data
exists, 3 data deleted, 60 day retain only and Database 2 with 10 versions data
exists, 6 data deleted, 90 day retain ony versi
For collocated pools, if there are available scratch tapes, a single node is
assigned to a tape. Only when you no longer have available scratch tapes
does TSM start "stacking" nodes on a tape. If you want to minimize tapes in
your copypool, I would suggest either not collocating or setting a low
How to have a MC directly points to tape?
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disk pool size vs large file
What we do is to put the one BIG Oracle TDP client we have into a separa
At 08:35 AM 6/22/2001 -0600, Kelly J. Lipp wrote:
>Doesn't this bring back the issue of Roll-Forward vs. not? I guess I'm
>still in the not camp with no compelling reason to join the other. Also,
>for those in the other camp, I'm thinking if your environment is so large as
>to fill a 13 GB log i
Vint,
Haev you tried running and "incremental by date only"?
"Vint Maggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 06/21/2001 10:29:03 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
S
>I experienced this error previously and noticed that our smit.log and
>smit.script files were huge.
>I cleared those files and that allowed more space for about 2 weeks.
>Now, I'm experiencing the same error and can't figure out what is taking up
>all the space.
The administration of your AIX sy
With database sizes on client systems increasing each day to 100s Gigs from
tens of Gigs, if the log size only goes up by 2.5 times the current size
limit, some piece has to get 4 times faster to maintain the current way
things are working.
If Tivoli is not going forward faster than its customers
Hi *SM-ers!
I have a client with a drive which is not backed up properly. The error in
the dsmerror.log is
06/20/2001 21:22:06 Return code 195 unknown
06/20/2001 21:22:06 Unknown system error
He is running 3.7.2.19, which is supposed to contain a fix for this error.
Anybody seen this too?
Kindes
Do you have enough space / permissions in /adsm/drplans?
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Dixon, Swonda
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: File write error message
>
>
> I'm new to the Adsm
I'm new to the Adsm / AIX gurus.
I'm receiving an error message:
ANRDicvolhst.c(4317): Error Writing to output File.
ANR6353EPREPARE: File write error.
ANR6951EPREPARE: Recovery plan file
/adsm/drplans/DRPLAN.20010621.143358 was not created.
ANR0985IProcess 26
>With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
>within that limit, I don't think many people will be hitting the 13GB limit
>all that quick. An incremental database backup will still flush the log,
>and, with 13GB, I think we'll be OK if we don't change the way we are doi
I'm with Kelly in thinking that roll-forward is unnecessary in most cases.
The TSM admin guide seems to recommend roll-forward:
"To get the best protection for your TSM data, you should use ...
mirrored copies of your database and recovery log, with the recovery log
mode set to roll-forward"
Hello,
I want to get information with select statement similar to:
query contents volume_name damaged=yes.
There is no column for damaged files with select * from contents.
Perhaps there is one someplace else ? (Not on select * from archives neither).
Thank you.
-
> We do mirror our tape pools. For each pool that has been defined we do
>have a copy tape pool. Actually I wanted to nullify the disk usage
I don't think TSM would work that well in a large implementation with out disks...
> which would have come down drastically in case of RAID 5.Cu
PL apply patches to 4.3.3 from IBM techsupport web site .PL look at bos.rte
file maintenance level.
Apply TSM patches on server side.Ur paging space need to be 2*mem(ram).
I had same problem(both client and server) on 433 and I solved it by above
method.
Balanand pinni
-Original Message-
Doesn't this bring back the issue of Roll-Forward vs. not? I guess I'm
still in the not camp with no compelling reason to join the other. Also,
for those in the other camp, I'm thinking if your environment is so large as
to fill a 13 GB log in a 24 hour period perhaps the environment is busting
Hi,
Do not use RAID 5 if performance is at all a concern.
I use RAID 1 (mirroring), for my database and log.
I use RAID 0 (striping), for my disk pools.
Jeff hit the nail on the head, configure your disks to be fast and build the
redundancy into your tapes.
IMHO, do not worry about redundancy
With the current limit of 5.3GB, and the steps we've all taken to work
within that limit, I don't think many people will be hitting the 13GB limit
all that quick. An incremental database backup will still flush the log,
and, with 13GB, I think we'll be OK if we don't change the way we are doing
o
I think either is fine, depending on your needs and throughput requirements.
WHen we started out I had the DB on RAID5, and just mirrored the logs, to
save space.
As we grew, performance on the DB became an issue, so we bought more disk
and switched to physical mirroring on the DB and logs to pi
Guillaume,
I sent the complete documentation to the command to the list a couple of
months ago. I was provided to me by another list participant.
If you search the recent archives you should find it. It is *about * 8
pages long.
Good luck.
Tab Trepagnier
TSM Administrator
Laitram Corporation
Thanks for the good suggestions. I made sure I was unlimited in all
aspects and checked for any circular linkage - all to no avail.
Well, it turn out that the problem is using exclude.dir on any directory
that is also a passed to dsmc as a filesystem to be backed up. Tivoli's
solution is to not
Hello
What is the syntax of the cleanup archdir command for version 4.1.2 . I have tried the
following : "cleanup archdir 'node_name' fix=yes" and I have parameters missing.
That syntax worked for version 3.1.XX
Thanks
Guillaume Gilbert
We do mirror our tape pools.For each pool that has been defined we do
have a copy tape pool.Actually i wanted to nullify the disk usage
which would have come down drastically in case of RAID 5.Currently the
utilization of the HDD space is double.
I do agree with your state
Quoting David DeCuir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> additional info if it helps:
> data per tape is either all NT or all UNIX
> mostly small files on NT
> about half small files on UNIX and half Oracle database files (2-20gb)
>
> The reason I ask is that my best guess seems to be such a wide range -
> I
INDEX ADSM-L
begin:vcard
n:TOURNIER;Alex
tel;fax:+x-0332-789073
tel;work:+x-0332-785694
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gvm.sai.jrc.it
org:JRC-SAI;Global Vegetation Monitoring
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:System Administrator
adr;quoted-printable:;;Via Fermi,1=0D=0ATP44
Did you increase your swap space size after adding new memory?
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Ursin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: memory problems on an aix box
I'm running tsm 4.1.3 on aix 4.3.3. and I have a memory proble
Any help?
begin:vcard
n:TOURNIER;Alex
tel;fax:+x-0332-789073
tel;work:+x-0332-785694
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gvm.sai.jrc.it
org:JRC-SAI;Global Vegetation Monitoring
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:System Administrator
adr;quoted-printable:;;Via Fermi,1=0D=0ATP440=0
Do you mirror your tapes? If not, that is where I would start to increase
my redundancy. The DISK storage pools ussually contain data for a short
period of time. The tapes for a long period of time.
RAID 5 is slow for writes. Depending on how much data you are moving
through the storage pools
I'm running tsm 4.1.3 on aix 4.3.3. and I have a memory problem.
It seems that after a memory upgrade from 512MB to 1536MB the dsmserv
process is eating all the memory and pagingspace. The software has drop
dead to times because of lack of paging.
Right now it reads
12396 root 60 0 1479M
Hi there !!
I have a problem regarding my results og my schedules...
I'am running *SM 3.1.2.58 under AIX 4.3.3 and writing my restults of the
scheduling in a
log, but it seems that i the only way to collect valid information about
the command/macro
i'am scheduling, in other words at the server i
Hy all,
we have two backup-server, where we write our data to a tape-library. For
all our tape-pools we have defined one copy-pool which links to the other
server where the data are written to a separate tape-pool (pool_extern). We
have defined collocation for all our pools. When I now run reclam
Hi All,
Currently we are running AIX over RS/6000 with TSM on top of it.This
is further integrated to the IBM 3494 library.
In the current scenario we have mirroring implemented only for the TSM
database .I want to built in more redundancy therefore planning to go
fo
>can anybody tell me what this error that I'm getting daily means?
>Is it normal/Harmless/major problem/... ?
...
>06/15/01 02:58:15 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 73
>06/15/01 02:58:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'.
Stan - From my notes at http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFa
$)C
Iykim,
You didn't say if you are running version 1 or version 2
of Tivoli Data Protection for Microsoft SQL.
This makes a difference. Look here for requirements:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tdp_ms.html#SQL
For your environment, the requirements for
Tivoli Data Protection
We use TSM 3.7.3.8 @MVS with several 3590-tapes shared with OS390.
Our biggest files are 30GB (Exchange) and normally went direct to tape
by setting a sizelimit to the diskstorage pool.
What happened last week was an incredible short backuptime of the exchange
node
without any error. Looking t
When I intended to backup sql db, this error message showed..
How does it works??
os:win2000, no win2000 service pack installed, mssql 7.0,
Client ended transaction DB-LIB message: Backup or restore operation terminating
abnormally
I have another question.
Is there any system requir
Hi all,
can anybody tell me what this error that I'm getting daily means?
Is it normal/Harmless/major problem/... ?
AIX server 3.7.4 & AIX client
Thanks,
Stan
06/15/01 02:58:15 TcpRead(): recv(): errno = 73
06/15/01 02:58:15 sessRecvVerb: Error -50 from call to 'readRtn'.
06/17/01 00:01
Yes, you are completely right ... files grater than available space in
diskpool are currently writed to tapepool ... no data will be lost and no
backup crash wouldn't occure. You can even set up the limit for diskpool to
exactly specify size of files, which have skip diskpool - parameter
MAXSIZE.
Lee ,
if you use exclude /tmp/ TSM will backup all the files that reside in tmp filespace
including
subdirectories
if you use exclude /tmp/* willn't backup files in tmp but will backup files in
subdirectories
if you use exclude /tmp/.../* no files and subdir's will have backuped
Sam,
actually storage pool has MAXSIZE THRESHOLD parameter,
it will limit the files that can be placed in that
storage pool up to the value assigned in MAXSIZE. If a
file is too large for the first storage pool it will
go straight to the next storage pool defined. But this
parameter is not requir
51 matches
Mail list logo
