Migration ADSM 2.1 from TSM 4.1 ...

2001-05-25 Thread FRANCISCO ROBLEDO
Hi, A need any recomendation about migration ADSM 2.1 in AIX from TSM 4.1 in NT 4.0? Thanks in advanced. Francisco Robledo VisionTech Colombia. _ Do You Yahoo!? Obtenga su direccisn de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com en http://correo.espanol

generate passwd on HA nodes

2001-05-25 Thread Boe Franklin
Solaris 2.6 TSM 3.7 I thought the encrypted passwd was located in /etc/adsm/SERVERNAME. When I copy this file from one node of a cluster to another (following failover) the gui reports that the passwd has expired. The cmd line seems to be ok. I haven't looked to deep, but how do you hand

Re: Win2k Scheduler & SYSTEM Account?

2001-05-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
Tim, thanks for the info. I tried it using 4.1.2.12, as you suggested, and the scheduler can back up fine under the SYSTEM account. Don't know why it fails at 3.7.2.19. But this solves my problem, thanks! -Original Message- From: Rushforth, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Does TSM check AIX permissions?

2001-05-25 Thread Richard Sims
>I couldn't find that when I searched the online doc, but I thought that's >what it said. However, in this case, it didn't do so. The admin says that >looking at "numerous" files in various filesystems he hasn't found any that >have a backup date that is the same as the date the permissions were

Re: Does TSM check AIX permissions?

2001-05-25 Thread Scotty Logan
While that's what the book says, it's not what appears to happen. I tested this on AIX 4.3.3 with a 4.1 client and a 4.1 server, and on Solaris 7 with a 3.7 client and a 3.7 server: the file is not backed up again. Changing the permissions on a file doesn't alter the file - it alters the inode,

Re: Does TSM check AIX permissions?

2001-05-25 Thread Fred Johanson
Richard, I couldn't find that when I searched the online doc, but I thought that's what it said. However, in this case, it didn't do so. The admin says that looking at "numerous" files in various filesystems he hasn't found any that have a backup date that is the same as the date the permission

Re: Does TSM check AIX permissions?

2001-05-25 Thread Richard Sims
>Should TSM consider the change of AIX permissions to be a modification of >the file, and therefore, back it up. Yes. See the B/A Client manual, "Backing Up and Restoring Files" chapter, "Backup: Related Topics", "What Does TSM Consider a Changed File". Richard Sims, BU

PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=106

2001-05-25 Thread Jim Kirkman
Greetings, AIX 4.3.3 client running 4.1.2 code talking to a 3.1.2-50 server on OS\390 is getting the above messages on numerous numerous directories. (full text below). A search of the archives found a couple of hits with the problem but none on solutions. Is is a rev issue with the older server

Re: MSCS and the GUI

2001-05-25 Thread Arturo Lopez
David, If I remember correctly the only way to view the shared drives is to launch the GUI from the ACTIVE CLUSTER (Who own's drives at that particular time). You will be able to see all cluster drives. Thx Arturo

Does TSM check AIX permissions?

2001-05-25 Thread Fred Johanson
Should TSM consider the change of AIX permissions to be a modification of the file, and therefore, back it up. We have a client on an AIX 4.3.3 box with TSM 3.7.2 where someone (whose mouse has been replaced with a thumbscrew) did a global change of permissions to 777. As far as we can tell by o

Re: Unsuscribe to List

2001-05-25 Thread Jon Adams
You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF ADSM-L" command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]). -Original Message- From: Area Técnica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 7:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unsuscribe to List Could you tell me

Re: Oxford TSM Symposium, Requirements Survey

2001-05-25 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
>as Sheelagh Treweek already announced the Oxford University TSM 2001 >Symposium will take place on 20th and 21st September 2001 in >Oxford (UK). Anyone thought of trying to get some of the more important things going on, on a web cast so we can hear it back here? Not sure if that's possible or c

Re: TSM with Win2000 Clustering

2001-05-25 Thread Arturo Lopez
Jeff, I have clustered half a dowen server with 4.1 on NT not W2000. I think they are pretty identical.I had no problems dealing with TSM the biggest pain was learning about MS CLuster Aware software. This allows for the failover of disk from active to passive or active/active. If you let

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Kauffman, Tom
Look at your library, look at your D/R recovery requirements -- and look at scripting. Your D/R requirements should drive what you do. Also (and I've seen a lot of this on the list) *don't* try to warp the backup logic of *SM to do something that should be done via archiving. If you need to keep

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Prather, Wanda
However, if you have high-capacity tape, you don't have to spend a whole tape for each node. You can control the tape use by setting a MAXSCRATCH value for the tape pool. For example, if you have 200 clients to back up and you set MAXSCRATCH to 100, TSM will put two clients on each tape. You ge

Re: SQL server recovery.

2001-05-25 Thread Arturo Lopez
Zosimo, We have in a pinch brought all the SQL Services down and did an archive of the database to a short 5 day archive period class. That is if you can afford to bring down the DB. We did this for a couple of weeks until a problem could be resolved with TDP for SQL server. Arturo

Re: AIX Disk-pools; mirror, RAID or simple copy-pool???

2001-05-25 Thread Jeff Rankin
I may have missed it in this e-mail, but have you considered doing OS mirroring on your data disk pools? I know that you are supposed to use TSM mirroring for Database and Recovery Log volumes, but I talked with Tivoli tech support on this issue several months ago and they couldn't give me a

TSM configuration questions to cross define servers for virtual volumes.

2001-05-25 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
Hi Anyone out there can pl help me to configure 3 TSM SERVERS to cross define and to use virtual volumes definations pl. I will appreciate ur help pl. Thankx. BALANAND PINNI. PHONE 314-206-5911. EM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PG:1-800-451-6897.

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
Chuck, I do all the platforms backup on to AIX servers ie 3 AIX Servers with AIX/HP/NT/SUN Clients. I didn't find any problems. U may centralise ur operations . -Original Message- From: Chuck Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 4:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

Re: Antwort: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Chuck Lam
Thank you. --- Rolf Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, > > I felt equal and defined one storage pool > (family) per plattform. I > don't use disk storage pools, only tape and copy > stgpools. > > Another way is to use collocation to separate data. > I use this only for > special cases

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Chuck Lam
Thank you. I'll see if I can do that. --- Sean McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck, > > You could make separate disk, tape, and copy > pools for each OS. > > Sean > > Sean McNamara > Senior Analyst > PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. > 955 Jefferson Ave > Norristown, PA 19403 > (610)6

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Steve Schaub
Chuck, Your TSM support person and Alan are saying the same thing - collocation is by node, which means it will only put data from one client node on a particular tape. There is not a "collocate-by-platform" option. Steve Schaub Haworth, Inc email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No trees were killed in

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Chuck Lam
Different sequential access storage pools need also different disk storage pool, right? The reason is that I am the Unix guy, also in charge of this AIX TSM server. I have enough system work on my daily duties. At this point, I can see myself spending a lot of time everyday sending tapes offsite,

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Chuck Lam
Thank you. I looked into that option, but TSM support person was telling me that if Colocation was enable, it would be one node, one tape, would not be able to put different nodes of one platform on one tape. --- Alan Davenport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You need to do colocation. Colocation w

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Sean McNamara
Chuck, You could make separate disk, tape, and copy pools for each OS. Sean Sean McNamara Senior Analyst PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 955 Jefferson Ave Norristown, PA 19403 (610)666-4206 (610)666-4285 (fax) -Original Message- From: Chuck Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fr

thanks

2001-05-25 Thread Patrick Sheehan
First, thanks for all the helpful responses I received yesterday regarding accessing a tape. I was able to get the backup I needed to restore. I do (of course) have another question. I have a Compaq (or is it Quantum or Tandem) DLT7000 35/70 drive. According to spec sheets I've seen it is suppose

NOVELL RESTORE

2001-05-25 Thread Marc Levitan
I am trying to restore files from a Novell server that is NOT currently running. What is the trick to do this? I know that with NT, I can use a virtualnodename. Has anyone successfully restored files from a Novell Server that is NOT Running? Thanks, Marc Levitan

Re: NOVELL RESTORE

2001-05-25 Thread Richard Sims
>I am trying to restore files from a Novell server that is NOT currently >running. > >What is the trick to do this? I know that with NT, I can use a >virtualnodename. Marc - Use -nodename. See the B/A manual, chapter 3, Restoring or Retrieving Your Files to Another Client Node. Richard

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Alan Davenport
You need to do colocation. Colocation will place files from each client on a tape by itself providing the client segregation you desire. You can even break this down even further and colocate by filespace. The downside is that you will significantly increase the amount of tapes you use. For furthe

Scripts for breaking and mounting bcv volumes from EMC Symmetrix system

2001-05-25 Thread Joe Spade
Need a little help. Does anyone have some scripts I can use as a pattern that will unmount, break and mount bcv volumes for a tsm backup from a Symmetrix server? Thanks. Joe Spade R & L Carriers, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x

2001-05-25 Thread Mustafa Baytar
We are using 3590 cartidges on TSM 3.7.3 with 3494 tape library "Smith, Bob" cc: (bcc: MUSTAFA BAYTAR/ATIM/ICECEK) Sent by: Subject: 3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x "ADSM: Dist

Re: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Suad Musovich
You just create different sequential access storage pools. What reason would you want them to handle their own tapes? (..just in case one of them purges their own tapes?) The data on those tapes cannot be used in another server. Have a look at the "Tivoli Storage Manager Concepts" redbook from h

Re: 3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x

2001-05-25 Thread Bert Moonen
Hello Bob, we are running on ADSM 3.1.2.90 and I'm using 3590 K-cartridges succesfully. We just had to label them again after we migrated the data to another cartridge. So I think when you migrate your data from the K-carts and label them again then TSM has no problems to see the difference betwe

Antwort: TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Rolf Meyer
Hallo, I felt equal and defined one storage pool (family) per plattform. I don't use disk storage pools, only tape and copy stgpools. Another way is to use collocation to separate data. I use this only for special cases (such as databases). Greetings Rolf Meyer Info Business Systems GmbH

Luuk Kleibrink/D903513/IS/DLVG is niet op zijn/haar kantoor.

2001-05-25 Thread Luuk Kleibrink
Ik ben niet op kantoor vanaf 24-05-2001 tot 05-06-2001.

Re: 3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x

2001-05-25 Thread Steve Schaub
We are using 3590J & K carts in our TSM 3.7.3.8 environment. We have had a significant amount of K tapes that have gone readonly due to write errors, though. K carts do require 3590 drive uprades & new microcode. Steve Schaub Haworth, Inc email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No trees were killed in the

Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...)

2001-05-25 Thread Steve Schaub
We had the same problem here with 3.7.3.8 on AIX 4.3.3 - getting our w/95/nt admin machines up to IE5.5 solved the problem for us. Steve Schaub Haworth, Inc email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenie

TSM configuration questions

2001-05-25 Thread Chuck Lam
I am setting up TSM in our shop and I am learning TSM as I go. Right now, I have set up a 100GB Disk Pool and one Tape Pool and one Tapecopy pool for making offsite storage copies. My questions are: If I am doing backups using this configuration, my daily backups on NT, Netware, and Unix will al

SDLT tape libraries

2001-05-25 Thread Irena Rokiene
Hello, A number of libraries with SDLT drives are appearing in the market. It is the next generation of DLT. However, we can't find a separate SDLT product line in supported devices table, which is presented on Tivoli Storage Manager site. Does it means, that SDLT line is treated as DLT line by

3590 K-Cartridges on TSM 3.7.x

2001-05-25 Thread Smith, Bob
I'm being told by IBM that I need to go to TSM 4.1.1 to upport these. Is this correct? Is anyone using 3590 K-cartridges on TSM 3.7.x? Thanks Bob Smith

Oxford TSM Symposium, Requirements Survey

2001-05-25 Thread Gerhard Rentschler
Hello, as Sheelagh Treweek already announced the Oxford University TSM 2001 Symposium will take place on 20th and 21st September 2001 in Oxford (UK). Please have a look at http://tsm-symposium.oucs.ox.ac.uk/home.html for details. One session of this symposium is dedicated to a discussion of user

Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...)

2001-05-25 Thread Stan Vernaillen
Michael Oski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 24/05/2001 19:31:11 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Stan Vernaillen/BE/CCE) Subject: Re: HTTP sessions in TSM 4.1.3.0 (also, memory leak...) >Hello, I did quite a bit of testing of differ

ie list order and comments

2001-05-25 Thread Bradley Tidd
Has anybody noticed anything different about the 4.1.2.0 TSM client in the way it reads the IE file? I am getting some unusual results, almost as if it is now readind top to bottom, instead of bottom to top. And or that the "*" is not a comment for the line.