Hi,
I am using UDB EEE V6 on SP2 and TSM for backing the UDB database on 3590 E
model drives. UDB backup is invoked using DB2 utilities which transfer the
data to Tivoli STorage manager to write to tape. The UDB backup is very
slow compare to normal file backup. It seem to indicate that the inter
Message sent on Paul Ewing's behalf :
> We run TDP for Microsoft Exchange. When the Backup Copy Group was set up
> it did not have
> the VERDELETED parameter set to 0 (zero). I have corrected and activated
> the Backup Copy Group.
> However the inactive backup versions do not get rebound
Good day all - been gone for a while but now I'm back.
I have a client that is thinking of moving over to the new LTO tape drives, for
a number of good reasons. I was wondering if there is anyone out there currently
employing or benchmarking these drives, and what the results have been so far. I
Brecton Whitten wrote:
>
> We are currently planning to move our TSM
> server from a 604e high node in an SP2 complex
> to an H50 standalone. Both platforms have the same
> number of CPU's and amount of memory ( 2 G ). The
> big difference being MCA vs. PCI. We are on TSM 3.7.4
> and are going t
Brec,
This has been discussed many times - check teh archive
I'd suggest that you install 3.7.4 on the new box, move the database over, then do an
upgrade.
The easiest way to move the database is to arrange so the DB is on external disk, then
move the disk to the new machine, with dsm.dsk and
Tim's got the right idea. Since it's AIX on both platforms, a db restore
will do the trick. No need to do the export / import. You only need to do
that if you are changing platform OS's.
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-59
Hi. I'd tryto 1, upgrade on your existing machineTSM to the
higher level...
on the new node have TSM installed (at the higher level)
disable sessions (on the day of the move)
on the day of the move...move all your disk data to tape (should be
a daily pro
*SM admins,
We are currently planning to move our TSM
server from a 604e high node in an SP2 complex
to an H50 standalone. Both platforms have the same
number of CPU's and amount of memory ( 2 G ). The
big difference being MCA vs. PCI. We are on TSM 3.7.4
and are going to move up to TSM 4.1.2 (
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a data recovery house that has 'cracked' the ADSM
encryption. I have a bad tape (only copy) from which I want to recover
the data.
Move data fails.
Thanks in advance,
Mary V
West Corp
Omaha, NE
I've heard that IBM has a service in San Jose that will recover data from
damaged media.
"Vraspir, Mary J." wrote:
> Hi all,
> Does anyone know of a data recovery house that has 'cracked' the ADSM
> encryption. I have a bad tape (only copy) from which I want to recover
> the data.
> Move data
Thanks for posting this, Frank. We have seen this too, but I hadn't done
the measurements. Sorry, but I don't know if there's a fix for this.
At 04:20 PM 1/30/2001 -0500, Mauro Jr, Frank wrote:
>I have an archive system where we were archiving thousands of files per
>night at a rate of 100 arch
I have an archive system where we were archiving thousands of files per
night at a rate of 100 archives/ 13 seconds. I upgraded the ADSM client to
TSM 4.1 and now it is archiving at a rate of 100 archives/16 minutes.
I archived one file which under ADSM which was so quick it showed less then
0 se
Excellent list Wanda. I will add:
One problem with failed schedules showing up as completed successfully is
fixed in 4.12. Not sure if this is the same one you mention for RSM. We
have experienced this on 3.7 and 4.1 - an example is Server out of Storage
Space, - schedules show as completed su
I am running it as root, with no limit. I have 4GB real memory, and 3GB
of paging space, 1% used.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_
BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
St. Louis, Miss
I have been wrestling with this question myself, and it's difficult.
Below is the information I have collected from THIS LIST on the various
client levels for Win2K. You have to be CAREFUL what you are doing
here, as there are problems with all available versions, some with very
ugly consequence
True. What I would really like to do is use the end_time, but with some
sort of a substring function to indicate only look at the first 10
characters. Evidently, using cast or substring with group is invalid. I've
tried several other fields(entity, etc) and all come up with errors.
At 12:14 PM
Hi, Dave. I notice you're grouping by End_Time. I'll bet that it's very
unlikely for all the filespaces of a node to finish backing up at the same
time. What else have you tried grouping by?
Alex Paschal
Storage Administrator
Freightliner, LLC
(503) 745-6850 phone/vmail
-Original Message--
OK, SQL Select gurus. I am trying to figure out, using the new summary
table in TSM 3.7, the select statement for how many bytes are backed up per
day for a given node. What I have so far is:
select cast((end_time)as date) as "Date", sum(bytes) as "Number of Bytes
for Node $1 Backed Up" -
from s
I'm trying to test generating and recovering from backupsets on a Solaris
4.1.2 TSM server for a Solaris 3.7.1 client . I generated a backupset by:
generate backupset acngds007 acngds007_01292001 * devclass=3584lib7
scratch=no vol=882aae retention=2 description='Backupset for Acngds007'
Try q occupancy:
tsm: ADSM>q occupancy *tdp
Node NameType Filespace StorageNumber
of Physical Logical
Name Pool Name
Files Space Space
Occupied Occupied
(MB)
Jeff,
what versions of server and client are you testing with? There were problems
in this area with earlier revs.
Jeff T wrote:
> I have a netware user who wants to use our TSM server for file backup. I
> gave him the software and he has been tesing it.
>
> He claims that the trustee rights f
hi,
I think 7200 for commtimeout value is more than enough. The only effect
that commtimeout has on sessions is that idle sessions stay longer before
got canceled by the server.
Probably, there isn't enough data to send through three different sessions.
Whey don't you start only one session? I
hi,
The file space that got created for TDPO backup is only virtual. So there
is no way to find out the capacity and pct util.
regards,
Thiha
>When I use TDP for Oracle the backup completes OK.
>But when I issue the command
>query filespace
>TSM tells me the following:
>Node Name
If your tape management system is DFSMSrmm, insertion of tapes happens
differently than CA-1 or CA-TLMS. If the tape isn't defined to the RMM
control dataset (CDS), then RMM adds it to his CDS using the default
insertion catagory (private/scratch) defined for that library. So, to
prevent RMM from
Andy,
I've seen strange behaviour when we have pushed up the bufferpool
and not also modded the binary to use 8 segments instead of 6. The
AIX server code is built to use 6 segments - equivalent to 1.5GB.
Depending on the number of threads etc I have seen some truly
terrible behaviour in the pas
hi,
Assuming that you have the DSMO_NODE and password file setup correctly,
startup no mount database on the second node.
% rman
RMAN> connect target
RMAN> connect rcvcat
RMAN> allocate channel... # with correct env vars
RMAN> restore controlfile
RMAN> sql 'alter database mount'
RMAN> restore
Thanks for the info!
Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/30/2001 12:16:03 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC)
Subject Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and R
Our CE has been working with Hardware support on this issue. The Hardware
PMR is 34925 Branch 422. As of yesterday, the record still stated the fix
would be released by the end of the month per our CE.
At 11:54 AM 1/30/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Diana,
>
>Who are you working with on the I/O problem
Welcome to the world of dueling hosts.
...been there done that
this condition is fixed by patching the mainframe. Get a good
understanding of what happens during library insert mode with respect to
the hosts attached, then look for info on CBRUXENT. This module is part of
OAM and provi
I am interested in knowing if it is possible to perform LAN free
Backup/archives with TSM 4.1 for Windows NT/2000.
I have a SAN that consists of five NT servers; one is my TSM 4.1 server. I
have a library (Qualstar 46120) attached to the SAN via Dells 35F Bridge.
The Host Bus adapters in the serv
Yes, our Atape driver is at 5.4.4.0. We initially went from 5.0.2.0 to
5.4.2.0 and saw the problem there also.
At 05:51 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>With the latest Atape driver 5.4.4.0 ?
>
>
>
>Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Am: 30.01.2001 16:46 GMT
>
>
>Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dis
Kathleen -
We are running J's and K's and the IO errors occur on both types of tapes.
At 11:10 AM 1/30/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Are you running with K cartridges as well? We've been seeing these errors
>also,
>but only on the K cartridges.
>
>Kathleen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Michael, Monte" <[EMAIL PRO
With the latest Atape driver 5.4.4.0 ?
Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am: 30.01.2001 16:46 GMT
Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE)
Thema:Re: Antwort: Re: Pro
>Has anyone seen strange behviour what the buffer pool memory is greater
>than 1GB? I normally have mine set to about 800MB, but since I have
>some spare memory, tried 1.2GB. It runs well for a while, but then
>exhibits strange behaviour. I enter admin commends, and the headings
>come back and
Diana,
Who are you working with on the I/O problems? Is there a contact in Tuscon (or
wherever) that you could give me? We've got an open PMR on this issue right now
and I'd like to be able to pass that info on to our CE so he can touch base with
them. And the end of the month is tomorrow...I
We are running 4.1.2.
At 05:41 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Are you using 4.1.0 or 4.1.2?
>
>
>
>
>Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Am: 30.01.2001 16:22 GMT
>
>
>Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew
Are you using 4.1.0 or 4.1.2?
Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am: 30.01.2001 16:22 GMT
Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE)
Thema:Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgr
You are hitting the max allowed. This is something like 1.3GB (or at least
it was < 3.7)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Carlson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 4:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 1GB Buffer Pool Memory
>
> Has anyone seen strang
Has anyone seen strange behviour what the buffer pool memory is greater
than 1GB? I normally have mine set to about 800MB, but since I have
some spare memory, tried 1.2GB. It runs well for a while, but then
exhibits strange behaviour. I enter admin commends, and the headings
come back and say
We are running D25D. This level of microcode ran fine prior to going to
TSM 4.1. We had never had an IO error before then. Now we receive the
errors on both our tape drives.
At 08:43 AM 1/30/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Diane,
>
>What level of microcode are you currently running on your 3590 tape dri
Are you running with K cartridges as well? We've been seeing these errors also,
but only on the K cartridges.
Kathleen
"Michael, Monte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/30/2001 09:43:28 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
adsmserv:/usr/lpp/adsmserv/bin/dsmserv.opt already has the line
COMMTimeout 7200
do you think I should boost it even higher? That should already be 2 hours!
What would be the downside of having a huge COMMTIMEOUT?
- Kai.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:53:20 -0800, Thiha Than <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied
Geoffrey, it appears your problem is
01/29/2001 23:49:38 ANS1943E The operation is not supported: Downlevel
server version.
While you may have the latest client code, the downlevel TSM server code doesn't
support backup sets.
good luck!
lisa
|+-->
||
Diane,
What level of microcode are you currently running on your 3590 tape drives.
We are running 3590E1A tape drives with a microcode level of D22E. We have
been on this level of code for quite some time with no errors. Our 3590's
are also house within a 3494.
-Original Message-
From
Hi ,
It seems you coded Domain all-local in dsm.opt - client tries to backup
systemobjects - not supported
on server < 3.7.3 , try to code domain c: d: e:
regards
Petr
- Pùvodní zpráva -
Od: Gill, Geoffrey L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Komu: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Odesláno: 30. ledna 2001 15
RSM controls label by own - when you enter new tape into library RSM mount
it and try to recognize label - it is
is unsuccesfull it moves tape into unrecognized media pool - to make tape
usable for any RSM enabled appliaction
you have to move tape into free media pool - RSM ask for confiramation
b
Salut Rick,
This is my procedure to define a drive.
Define Library in ADSM
adsm> define library 3590lib libtype=scsi device=/dev/rmt0.smc
ANR8400I Library 3590LIB defined.
adsm> q libr
Library Name LibraryDevice Private Scratch
External
Type
Thanks Diana,
Will be making the jump from 3.1 to 4.1 very
soon, so any other Hints or Tips would be most valuable!!
TSM backs up rights and IRFs only at a directory level, not a file level. You may
want to have your user create a file structure that adheres to this, create a
directory, administer the rights to that directory and place the file in that
directory. Moving forward, you will want to consider th
Petr,
You must be kidding me.. hehe
ok.. one last question.. if I do an inventory the tapes are taken out of I/O
and placed into the slots.. how do I know if the tapes are labeled
properly.. do I care ? or is it done automaticly.. ?
Thanks for your support Petr.. you are a little synical but I l
The Message is ANS1943E (Not ANS1934E):
ANS1943E The operation is not supported: Downlevel server version.
Explanation: The operation cannot be performed because server version is
downlevel.
System Action: Processing stopped.
User Response: Use correct server version.
The backup probably failed o
Recently we upgraded a server to Win2k. The TSM client software I installed
was the newest. The backup last night has reported as failed as you can see
from the server activity log, and the rest of the logs. I'm not sure I
understand what the error messages below mean:
ANS1934EBackup set '
It's GUI - go control pannel - computer management - removable storage - now
you should see
Media pools
Physical locations
Work queue
Oprator requests.
in physical locations you should see library and drives - check it
in media pools you should see "tsm\server1\library name" , unrecognized and
f
Is he backing up from his workstation? If so, all the client sees is a mapped
drive. As far as I know, the file sytem rights of the client platform are
backed up. The TSM client (Windows, I assume) knows nothing about the Novell
trustee rights - except that he can see the files. He thinks he's bac
Petr,
is this RSM manager a GUI based tool, where do I find it ?
or is it only command-line ?
Thanks for yr help
regards,
Etienne
>From: Petr Pxerost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 35xx library with W2K (RSM)
I had posted some questions last month regarding problems we encountered
after our upgrade to TSM 4.1 and thought I would pass along what we
found. We are using AIX 4.3, 3590E's and a 3494.
When issuing the dsmadmc command we received "ANS1033E An invalid TCP/IP
host name was specified". Resolu
>any suggestions on how to define the drives and label the tapes would be
>very much appreciated...
Etienne - Have you followed the LTO instructions in the server Readme
file and found them not to be effective?
I have a netware user who wants to use our TSM server for file backup. I
gave him the software and he has been tesing it.
He claims that the trustee rights for NDS file objects are not being
preserved on restore.
Is there a way to ovecome this?
I have limited netware knowledge so I'm in a bad p
Someone knows this error message and how to solve it?
This error appears when we try to reinstall the TDP in another folder after
uninstall it. We follow this procedure:
1. Uninstall the application using the add/remove tool from the control
panel on windows
2. Delete the Tivoli Folder
3. Remove f
Hello Etienne ,
no drive definitions in W2K , inject tapes into library with RSM manager by
I/O station or manualy throught door ( if you use door
you have to audit library with RSM ) - you will see them in media pool named
unrecognized - drag and drop them to free media pool - RSM will write free
Kieron - Configuration information for the 3995 and many other devices is
unfortunately absent from the *SM documentation. Doing an APAR
search on "3995" turned up IX79416, which specifies element numbers and
SCSI IDs, which may be of some value in your struggle with configuration.
R
Hi all,
Defining the LTO library on W2K is working fine.. but I cannot define any
drives !!
How does Label libvol work ? can I issue search=bulk ? or even search=yes..
with labelsource=barcode..?
Why is it on NT4.0 working like sunshine.. and does this newer W2K based on
the same OS make it so m
Hi
Has anyone seen this before?
We have a 3995 C66 attached to an IBM RS/6000 H70 running AIX 4.3.2 and
ADSM 3.1.2.90. We have had a major headache trying to get this optical
jukebox to work!!
The configuration with ADSM has been checked, double checked even triple
checked and no problems can b
Joe,
I think Richard is spot on in saying that the hardware configuration
dictates the size of the database that you can support. And there is
no magic formulae ...
Over the last five years we have taken *SM from :
- a single server on RS6000/R24
- moved it to on RS6000/R40
(not much gain; be
64 matches
Mail list logo
