Kathleen,
I've seen this often.
When a scratch tape is needed (and I think after the "normal" scratch tapes
have been used up)
the ones in the pending state (reusedelay=0) will be converted into
scratch.
--
Peter Koblauch
From: Kathleen M Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
Steve and Curt,
TSM4120_Server.exe is a self-extracting Installshield package for the web
package. When unpacked the package is about 146MB.
Please try providing a full path on the "Location to Save Files" page of
the Installshield package for the web wizard.
By default this path shows
TSM
Actually this info isn't in the NODES table, either. The TSM server stores
the IP addresses for nodes using the PROMPTED scheduling mode only, so the
server knows which address to prompt when it is time to run scheduled
events. However, the table in which this data resides has not been
externalize
I am sory to correct you, but there is a field in the nodes table that
stores the hex IP address of the client.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Williams, Tim wrote:
> I don't think that it really 'stores' that information, per se.
> IT, is however logged in the activity log...
It is stored in the Nodes table in the TSM server Database
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, David Longo wrote:
> When you register a node name and the node first contacts the *SM Server, the server
>stores the IP address of the client. Where is this IP address stored on the server?
>
>
> David B. Longo
>
when the tapes go into use and reach full status there capacity will be
updated.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Eliza Lau wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We just upgraded all the 3590B1A drives in the 3494 to 3590E1A with the
> option to support the Extended Length 3590-K tapes.
> I did the following to redefine the
Using a new node name, run monthly selective backups of your server.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Forgosh, Seth wrote:
> Due to a failed server and the length of time required to restore it, my
> management has "requested" that we implement monthly full backups of all
> "critical" servers. How would I g
They will return to scratch as soon as the pending delay they were set
under expires. After that they will not go into pending state again.
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Kathleen M Hallahan wrote:
> When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is
> subsequently update
You will have to manually change the default capacity in your devclass to 40
GB. We noticed that when we upgraded to the 3.7 server we actually dropped
to 10 GB. If you look at the help pages (on 3.7) you will notice that Tivoli
thinks the 3590E-C capacity is only 10 GB. Go figure.
Ken
> -Or
I don't think that it really 'stores' that information, per se.
IT, is however logged in the activity log
q actlog.search=etc (help q actlog)
hope this helps...
David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/18/2000 02:24 PM
Please r
I just downloaded the fix and also have the same problem. Tivoli are you
listening?
"Magura, Curtis" wrote:
>
> Has anyone downloaded the latest server for NT 4.1.2.0 and been able to
> install? Tried it on two different machines and it stops within a minute and
> is looking for 139MB of addition
Is anyone using W2K Group Policy to distribute TSM?
I have distributed the 4.1.2 client using Group Policy but ...
What I would really like to do is install the software, PLUS use a
customized dsm.opt file, PLUS install the Web Client Services and TSM Client
Scheduler.
If I run setup, I can pla
This is some benchmarks that I had run.
TSM / ArcServer Backup-Restore Comparison
Test server:Compaq 7000
Pentium Pro 200
Ram 1703 Meg.
Test volume on the ESS (Shark)
Original restore from FHNW108 to FHNW950 12.4 gig 7 hours 1.77 gig/hour. I
As in fact they did--thanks to all for the replies!
Kathleen
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/18/2000 02:41:18 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Kathleen M Hallahan/ISS/HQ/FHLMC)
Subject
Has anyone downloaded the latest server for NT 4.1.2.0 and been able to
install? Tried it on two different machines and it stops within a minute and
is looking for 139MB of additional space. File downloaded -
TSM4120_Server.exe.
Both machines have more that that amount of free disk space. We were
When you register a node name and the node first contacts the *SM Server, the server
stores the IP address of the client. Where is this IP address stored on the server?
David B. Longo
Systems Administrator
Health First, Inc. I/T
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pa
>When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is
>subsequently updated to "reusedelay=0 days," how long should it take before
>those tapes drop into scratch status? I expected them to change status
>immediately, and they aren't.
Pending volumes are re-evaluated every ho
Hi All,
We just upgraded all the 3590B1A drives in the 3494 to 3590E1A with the
option to support the Extended Length 3590-K tapes.
I did the following to redefine the drives:
rmdev -l rmt1 -d
cfgmgr
adsm> upd devclass 3590tape format=3590E-C
adsm> del drive 3494lib tapedrive1
adsm> def drive 34
A change in the reuse delay setting will not effect tapes that are already
in pending state. If you need the tapes back immediately, you could delete
the volume.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen M Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 1:07 PM
To: [EMA
Last we did was two years ago. This was shortly after we started uing ADSM so
the data on the tapes was not very fragmented.
Netware 4.11 on a Compaq 2500 with an Adaptec 2944 attached to EMC external
array. The client was 3.1 and also the server (running on an RS6000 - 7011 I
believe, and 8mm dr
Due to a failed server and the length of time required to restore it, my
management has "requested" that we implement monthly full backups of all
"critical" servers. How would I go about doing that? Any input would be
greatly appreciated.
Seth Forgosh
What is adsmautodelete used for ?
>> To delete the exchange backup versions
Does the Backup Copy Group retention
data not work for exchange data ?
>> NO.
How do you specify different node names ? On the client site, you only
have 1 dsm.opt file and so pointing to the
same management => 1 retent
Sorry for the stupid question but :
- What is adsmautodelete used for ? Does the Backup Copy Group retention
data not work for exchange data ?
- How do you specify different node names ? On the client site, you only
have 1 dsm.opt file and so pointing to the
same management => 1 retention policy
I'm just looking for any guesstimates anyone might have for the throughput we might
"expect" to see restoring a Netware 3.1.08 client with a TSM 3.7.3.0 OS/390 server.
This is over a 100M ethernet with 3490 tape robot on the server. We have split the
restore up over 4 sessions and have disabl
When a storage pool contains tapes in pending status, and the pool is
subsequently updated to "reusedelay=0 days," how long should it take before
those tapes drop into scratch status? I expected them to change status
immediately, and they aren't.
Thanks!
Kathleen
Hi Mahesh,
I have also experienced this on older versions of TSM after I had had a 3590
serviced in the 3494. One way I found to get aroung the halt of the TSM server
was to delete the tape device and re-create it. Takes under one minute and
doesn't require downtime for TSM.
Thanks,
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/16/2000 07:43:59 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: ADSM Edm/Net)
Subject: Re: Can't Del Disk Vol
>> You should contact IBM/Tivoli Support. A Level 2 tech can assist you in
>> removing the values from the DB
>This is a known isssue, and has been corrected at the latest levels of 3.7
>and 4.1
>
>Keith Davey
Keith - I had a look at the 4.1.2 README for the Windows server and, using
all obvious keywords, could not find mention of this problem having
been resolved. It is very problematic for cus
Hello Greg
I restore the backupset connected to a server.
1 I generate the backupset on the large central TSM server.
2 I define the netware node , the backupset on a previously installed small TSM
server
3 I restore the backupset
restore backupset bksetibe01.1025 volu=exp001,exp002 -loc=server
We perform daily FULL backups of Exchange and Monthly (actually every 4
weeks) COPY backups (so as not to interfere with the daily backups).
We simply use a Different Node Name for the Monthly backups - plus different
option files, different command files. We use the adsmautodelete - for our
bac
>Thanks to all those who replied. I am now using TSM4.1 to run these test
>backups. Each backup is taking around 1hr longer than the previous backup. I
>noticed that the files are being marked as inactive when I run the next sel
>backup so I assume this is the reason for the extra hrs delay on the
John,
One easy and simple way would be to have separate TSM Server
NODENAME for your "monthly" vs. "daily" backups.
Perform "COPY" type backups monthly. Then, you could
use different ADSMAUTODELETE values for each nodename.
By the way, TDP for Exchange V2, targeted for Q1/2001
starts using the
Hi,
I have a Sun server which is connected via fiber to IBM SAN gateway
2108-G07. The gateway is connected via SCSI to 3590E tape drives. I have already
installed IBMtapeutil. If I do:
# cd /devices
# ls
central@1f,0fhc@4,f880 sbus@2,0sbus@6,0
fhc@0,f880 pseudo sbus@
John,
You cannot do it using the "/ADSMAUTODELETE" option. For me the onyl way to
do it is to create a script which select each backup you want to delete.
Look in the www.adsm.org, on the first version of the agent someone wrote a
kind of script which do the same thing that the "/ADSMAUTODELETE".
>From past experience with general UNIX problems, this looks like a Shared Library
>problem. As you upgraded from ADSM to TSM the directory paths changed.
Do you have any environment variables that need to be changed? Do you have any like a
"LIBPATH" setup?
David B. Longo
Systems Administ
Our Exchange admins would like to use TDP to take daily and monthly backups.
What they like to do is take a full backup on a daily basis. This is kept
for 14 days. They also would like to take a monthly backup and keep them for
a year. This came about because we had some files disappear from some
We have one TSM 3.7.2 server that is sending IBMADSM_SERVER_EVENT messages
to out TEC server. We have several other TSM servers that are correctly
sending TSM_SERVER_ANR messages to our TEC server. The only difference
between these servers is that the first one was upgraded to TSM from ADSM.
I've defined it as ECART .
thank you for your help
Giuseppe Taccone
TSM Manager
I.A.N. s.rl.
V.le Fulvio Testi, 11
20092 Cinisello Balsamo (Mi)
Tel +390261866362
Fax +390261866315
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Keith
Hi All,
I am upgrading HP-UX11.0 ADSM client from v3.1 to v3.7.2 & connectAgent
v2.1.7 to TDP Oracle v2.1.10. (AIX ADSM Server v3.1.2.57)
After upgrade, dsmc can be invoked and backup/restore is working, however
the following message is displayed in dsmerror.log once dsmc is invoked.
12/18/00
This is a known isssue, and has been corrected at the latest levels of 3.7
and 4.1
Keith Davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Short, Anne wrote:
> I am running TSM 4.1.1 on W2K with an Exabyte 440 library with Mammoth
> drives. I have noticed that when a write operation reaches the end of the
> tape, T
Thanks to all those who replied. I am now using TSM4.1 to run these test
backups. Each backup is taking around 1hr longer than the previous backup. I
noticed that the files are being marked as inactive when I run the next sel
backup so I assume this is the reason for the extra hrs delay on the bac
In what manner have you defined the library to TSM. ACSLS?
Keith davey
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Giuseppe Taccone wrote:
> Subject: storagetek stk9740 (drive 9840) with TSM 4.1 on AIX 4.3.3
>
>
> Is there anybody that have already use the library stk9740 storagetek with TSM 4.1
>or 3.7 on AIX 4
No, they are Mammoth 1 drives, and per all the compatibility spreadsheets,
they are supported.
Anne Short
Lockheed Martin Enterprise Information Systems
Gaithersburg, Maryland
301-240-6184
CODA/I Storage Management
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mo
Robert,
TDP for Exchange talks to the Exchange server through
an Exchange backup/restore API. The Exchange API also has a
nice feature that if there is an error from an API call,
you can call another API with the error code and it will
return a message with text explaining what the problem is.
I
Yes. AutoVault will manage the offsite vaulting of copy pools as well as
primary pools. To vault your archivals, you would config AutoVault to
manage that particular primary pool. All media in that primary pool will be
taken offsite. All other primary pools containing your backup data would
re
We are running TSM 3.7.3.0 and trying to complete a large restore from over the
weekend which had to be restarted last night due to a hardware problem. It is my
understanding that restore requests will only use one tape drive for mounting restore
volumes. My boss is asking if there is a way
Have you Mammoth-2 drives in the library?
I have the same error with mammoth-2 drives, but the version 4.1 is not
supported this drives!
Michael
Von: "Short, Anne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am: 18.12.2000 12:49 GMT
Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL
I am running TSM 4.1.1 on W2K with an Exabyte 440 library with Mammoth
drives. I have noticed that when a write operation reaches the end of the
tape, TSM reports an I/O error and marks the tape as "read-only". At the
same time, a query of the volume indicates that the tape's status is
"Filling"
>This last backup for a Microsoft Exchange Server with Adsm Connect Agent =
>I got errors messages as:
>
>ANS0322E no text available for this return code.
>ANC3025E and ANC4226E nothing about this in Messages book.
>
>Can anybody help me to find explanation about those messages or give me =
>what
> At times, the tape volume is not able to unload it self from a 3590
> E1A tape drive ( for any reason) and the drive becomes 'unavailable"
> for TSM. Though the problem gets rectified in the library but I "have"
> to restart the TSM server to make it available again in TSM.
Soun
Another possibilityIF your update drive command syntax INCLUDES
device=.then please drop it
Try leaving off the device= parm (only use this parm if you want
to update the device characteristics
I ran into this problem which should lead into some doc
update
Mahesh,
this is a known TSM problem with version 3.7.3 .
You will need to upgrade your code to be at 3.7.3.6 or higher, this has
been resolved at these versions.
Good Luck.
Othonas
Mahesh Babbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/18/2000 04:36:39
AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor
Hello WIZs,
I have following issue:
At times, the tape volume is not able to unload it self from a 3590
E1A tape drive ( for any reason) and the drive becomes 'unavailable"
for TSM. Though the problem gets rectified in the library but I "have"
to restart the TSM ser
Subject: storagetek stk9740 (drive 9840) with TSM 4.1 on AIX 4.3.3
Is there anybody that have already use the library stk9740 storagetek with TSM 4.1
or 3.7 on AIX 4.3.3 platform?
I' ve a lot of problem to configure this library with tsm and don't understand if the
problem is hardware or so
I will be out of the office from 12/15/2000 until 01/02/2001.
I will respond to your message when I return.
55 matches
Mail list logo
