Thank you for all those response.
Regards,
Eric Tang
Any idea why I might be getting the following message when trying to back
up a volume on a Netware 5 client?:
09/12/2000 22:00:48 Incremental backup of volume 'E011CNCROOKS\NSS_ADMIN:'
09/12/2000 22:00:48 ANS1076E *** Directory path not found ***
NSS_ADMIN displays as a volume for server E011CNC
Can you give me some more specifics, as in what "opsys limits" and where
they are ?
This is a RED HAT 6.2 LINUX server.
Richard Sims
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
"
> I am having trouble with reboots of AIX and Sun Solaris boxes that
>have 3494 libraries attached. If a tape is mounted at the time the system
>is rebooted or crashes, when adsm comes back up, the drive is inaccessible.
>The error message in the activity log after the startup of adsm, will t
I am having trouble with reboots of AIX and Sun Solaris boxes that
have 3494 libraries attached. If a tape is mounted at the time the system
is rebooted or crashes, when adsm comes back up, the drive is inaccessible.
The error message in the activity log after the startup of adsm, will tell
>It complains that a TCPWINDOWSIZE of 131072 is invalid and is defaulting to
>131070
In the B/A client manual on the option:
Note: Depending on the operating system communication settings, your
system might not accept all values in the range of values.
That is, the value
Using the above, supported client(s), coded TCPWINDOWSIZE 128 in DSM.SYS.
It complains that a TCPWINDOWSIZE of 131072 is invalid and is defaulting to
131070
Went through ADSM.ORG archives and saw some references to TCPWINDOWSIZE and
other UNIX platforms. There were suggestions to code T
>> If I were to set the "Next Storage Pool" field on TAPE1 pool to be
>> TAPE2 and set the TAPE1 pool access to READONLY, will the TAPE1 pool
>> basically be skipped and the TAPE2 pool be used as secondary storage for
>> pool DISK1?
>
>I don't know, but you can force data movement from DISK1 to TA
> I am soon to be migrating from 3490 tape technology to 3590E tape
> technology. Will the following work?
>
> Say I have the following storage pools:
>
> DISK1 (Disk storage pool - next storage pool = TAPE1)
> TAPE1 (3490 sequential access pool)
> TAPE2 (3590 sequential access pool)
> 2. Reclamation only works within a storage pool.
It is in fact possible to define a primary tape storage pool to specify a
different storage pool as the destination for reclamation. This feature was
intended primarily to allow for reclamation with only one tape drive, but it
can also be used t
Silicon Valley TSM User's Group
Thursday, October 5, 2000
2:00PM to 4:30PM
IBM Almaden Research Center
(the place it all started!)
650 Harry Rd.
San Jose, CA 95120
Announcing the first ever Silicon Valley TSM User's Group!
Please join us for the first of many meetings. Yo
How about the failed and successful fields? I am
seeing many skipped files on my NT servers but failed
= 0 and successful = yes for these.
I will also open a record with ibm/tivoli.
--- Bill Colwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am on 3.7.3.6 for os/390 and it is not fixed.
> Examined and
> a
Tom,
I would do this;
set the diskpool to go directly to tape2 (upd stg disk1 nextpool=tape2).
Set the reclaimstgpool on tape1; this is a feature that was added
in version 3. It directs reclaim output to another pool
(upd stg tape1 reclaimstgpool=tape2).
There is no nextpool parameter for co
1. Set the "Next storagepool" for DISK1 to TAPE2.
2. Reclamation only works within a storage pool.
> I am soon to be migrating from 3490 tape technology to 3590E tape
> technology. Will the following work?
>
> Say I have the following storage pools:
>
> DISK1 (Disk storage pool - next st
Hello All,
We are having a problem when attempting to backup a tablespace from a
SAP Oracle database. I have included the output and errors we receive below.
Our environment is
SAP server -AIX 4.3.3
Oracle 8.0.5.2.1
SAP V4.5
> Can Tivoli backup up the 'contents' of a named pipe?
>
> Is there any way I can use 'dsmc' to back up standard input? Usually in
> this sort of situation I'd see if the Pick 'dump' command would accept a
> Unix named pipe (FIFO) as its device argument, and then run a backup
> command reading st
I am soon to be migrating from 3490 tape technology to 3590E tape
technology. Will the following work?
Say I have the following storage pools:
DISK1 (Disk storage pool - next storage pool = TAPE1)
TAPE1 (3490 sequential access pool)
TAPE2 (3590 sequential access pool)
OFF1(
Nope. It's the same.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Tang [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 5:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NT Workstation TSM 3.7.2.01 client installation
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have installed TSM 3.7.2.01 on several NT Servers an
medrs2:spray medrs1 -i -l 2082
sending 48 packets of length 2082 to
medrs1 ...
no packets dropped by medrs1
5999 packets/second, 12490438 bytes/second
So , my sysytem is running in healthy condition?
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 09/15/2000 09:42:45 AM
Please res
Yes, It is!
Im running it right now...
//Niklas
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Johnson, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Skickat: den 15 september 2000 14:56
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: TSM v.4 Server for OS/390
Hello all,
Does anyone know if TSM V4.1 is available for OS/390
TIA
I should further qualify my posting about exploiting the 'spray' command
in performing network performance tests to say that it is possible to use
it where the destination system does not have a sprayd daemon running,
by using the -i option to instead send ICMP echo packets (as ping does).
In this
Some previous post related to issues in Networking on AIX 4.3
and Netcards config.
Other changes that should be noted about the difference
between AIX 4.2 networking and 4.3.
1) DNS Default is looking for a IPV6 DNS Server.
2) PMTU Discovery can clone virtual nets
Along with configuring netw
The platform I am using is NT.
Ok, I understand that I am in try-buy mode. Not what I had in mind, but now
that I am, what do I do?
Can I install the base TSM 4.0 over 4.1.1.0 to get the licensing executable? I
have paid for a two year software subscription so getting the software is
not a pro
Hello all,
Does anyone know if TSM V4.1 is available for OS/390
TIA
Regards,
Brian Johnson
Merrill Lynch, NY
Storage Strategy Team
Tel: 212 - 647 3557
If you are refering to the 3.7.2.01 client software, I am using the same
client package on my servers as I am using on my pc (Windows NT 4.0
Workstation) as well as the other person in our company responsable for
network backups.
Sean Duffy
Network Analyst
Alcatel Canada TA
>I also use an old product called UserAccess which is a kind of ftp
>with minimal scripting capability. It has the unique ability to send
>a bit stream from one system to another without having to read a file
>on one end and write it on the other. It gives a real good test of
>maximum lan throug
On 14 Sep 2000, at 12:02, Gerald Wichmann wrote:
> TSM backups were seeing a network throughput of 600-1000K/sec.. this was
> horrible as I was used to seeing 4000-5000K/sec.. Backups were running well
> into the day.. something was seriously amiss. After doing some sniffing (we
When we have a au
Hi *sm'rs
I would like to have an offsite copypool, that is updated on, say a daily
basis :
The tapes that needs to be checked out of the library and updated with
access=offsite are the tapes that were just written to during the last
"backup stg", and the latest db-backup (I guess?). Furthermore I
> Over time I've seen posts on this listserv about not using
>auto-negotiate for network interface cards and hard coding the
>line speed like 100mbit full duplex. They use auto-negotiate on
>all of our Compaq Windows NT servers here and can't help but
>wonder, based on posts on this listserv,
>Above and beyond that, is there information out in the big wide world as to what
>factors to consider and what parameters to check (end-to-end i.e. ADSM server,
>network, and ADSM client) to maximize restore performance, especially in the
>case of a large amount of data (10-100 Gb) all at once to
Hi All,
I have installed TSM 3.7.2.01 on several NT Servers and I am going to
install it to NT workstation the first time tomorrow, just want to ask if
there is any difference between the two. Thanks
Regards,
Eric Tang
Ted,
I have tryed the recovery scripts to our test machine and it did the job
without problems.
Regards,
Tjeerd Saijoen
Business Facility Services
The Netherlands
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ted Byrne
Sent: Friday, September 1
32 matches
Mail list logo
