[Acme] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-06

2024-11-25 Thread Geoff Huston
I'll skip those points where we agree, and just answer your queries: 2. Introductioon: "Allowing issuing CAs to suggest a period in which clients should renew their certificates enables for dynamic time-based load balancing." There is a word missing here - enables WHAT? I believe it's actually

[Acme] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-06

2024-11-23 Thread Geoff Huston via Datatracker
Reviewer: Geoff Huston Review result: Ready with Nits Overall the specification is quite reasonable. I have some nots that I feel would improve the readability of the document. 1. Introduction, "All three techniques lead to load clustering for the issuing CA." I'm not sure

[Acme] Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-07

2024-12-15 Thread Geoff Huston via Datatracker
Reviewer: Geoff Huston Review result: Ready The nits I raised in my previous review have been addressed, and from my perspective I believe that the draft is now ready. ___ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le