Looks good to me as well.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:40 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi Deb,
>
> That matches my understanding of the proposal.
>
> (I always get a bit nervous about using "Verified" for new text that
> points to
> references that didn't exist at the time of the publication of the o
Hi ACME WG,
As promised at the IETF 122 session, I've updated my ACME Profiles draft
with the current list of known implementations, and a few editorial
improvements to match feedback I received on the ARI draft.
Based on the conversation at that meeting, I believe the chairs are
intending to ask
Hi all,
Apologies, I was out for the past two weeks. I agree that this draft still
represents the group consensus, and think it should proceed.
Aaron
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:11 AM Sipos, Brian J.
wrote:
> Chairs, as document author I also support its continued progress. I
> believe it still
