> I really think it's a mistake to lump attestation responses in with
> authorization
> challenges. As I said in the WG session, I think that the terminology is an
> attractive nuissance and we need a new term that describes the process by
> which a client proves they are "sane" enough to be i
Thank you Amir. This draft solves a problem that is hindering adoption of
ACME. I’ve reviewed it and am happy with the simplifications that place the
focus on solving that one specific problem.
In order for CAs to implement this new domain validation method, the CAB
Forum’s TLS Baseline Requiremen