Yoav Nir has requested publication of draft-ietf-acme-ari-06 as Proposed
Standard on behalf of the ACME working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-ari/
___
Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
Aaron,
You can issue a new version of the draft, even as it sits in my queue. I'd
prefer you do that before I start my review.
Deb
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:18 PM Aaron Gable wrote:
> Thanks Yoav!
>
> I've already spoken with Jacob about this change offline, and plan to
> bring it up as part
Sure. We’ll add it to the agenda.
Just please send slides tomorrow (Tuesday)
> On 3 Nov 2024, at 17:42, Liuchunchi(Peter)
> wrote:
>
> Hi chairs,
>
> Just saw the posted 121 acme agenda, can’t help but notice that we have a 1.5
> hour session but only a 1 hour agenda. Can I make use of t
Thanks for that.
If I’m reading this correctly, this is all clarification, not bits-on-the-wire
changes. Changes like that can be added after WGLC if they don’t raise
objections.
I see that you are not registered for the IETF meeting, so it probably doesn’t
make sense to discuss it at the ACM
Thanks Yoav!
I've already spoken with Jacob about this change offline, and plan to bring
it up as part of my timeslot this week. You're absolutely right that it
doesn't affect any of the bits on the wire; it's just instructions on
client behavior. I'm in favor of incorporating this language (or a
Thanks for the clarification! We'll discuss Jacob's proposed language in
the session on Wednesday, and I'll plan to issue draft -07 shortly after
the document freeze is over.
Aaron
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024, 21:47 Deb Cooley wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> You can issue a new version of the draft, even as it sit
