It’s a minor point, but the minutes from 120 state there was a WGLC for this
draft and no responses were received. There was a response and a subsequent
update to the draft with minor edits to address concerns in that response:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/lW-R45txi3O9stl3Red5gWa3A
Here’s the review I promised during the session. Apologies for the brevity, but
I did want to get some comments out for Q.
In general, I like it. Lots of new and cool stuff in there. I wish I had more
time to learn about it and think about it.
I’m unclear on the motivation for wildcard on
