Moin,
For those who weren't at IETF120 the consensus of the room was that
draft-ietf-acme-onion was ready to be sent to the IESG, but we ofc need to
confirm on the mailing list.
So, if those of you who expressed satisfaction with the draft at 120, and
those who weren't present, could please respo
As I was at 120 and have watched this eveolve, and expressed it was ok, I
have now taken the opportunity to fully re-read the current version of the
draft. I am still good with it.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 3:56 AM Q Misell
wrote:
> Moin,
>
> For those who weren't at IETF120 the consensus of the r
This adds more security discussions for Public and Private networks...
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sweet-iot-acme-06.txt
> Date: August 9, 2024 at 4:34:08 PM EDT
> To: "Michael Sweet"
>
> A new version of Internet-
