[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-11-02 Thread Liuchunchi(Peter)
Yes, the acme server can decide the certificate-issuing policies (what claims in the attestation results to look at) on their own. From: Meiling Chen Sent: 2024年10月31日 14:09 To: Liuchunchi(Peter) ; acme@ietf.org Cc: acme-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: RE: [Acme] new acme draft -- rats identifier a

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-30 Thread Meiling Chen
Hi, Well, then, this problem lies before the certificate issuance action, Only users who meet the specific conditions can obtain legitimate certificates, right? So I would like to ask the experts in certificate, what kind of verification or filtering judgments are needed in the current issuance

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-28 Thread Liuchunchi(Peter)
Hi Meiling, >> Problem: Certificate forgery issue It’s not exactly about certificate forgery. It’s about issuing certificates to posture/trustworthiness-checked accessing devices, more like an authorization challenge. So maybe this answers Q1? >> The certificate verifier verifies that the holder

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-27 Thread Meiling Chen
Hi Peter, I have reviewed your draft, this draftis related to RATS, so I noticed it, I am trying to understand from these aspects: Problem: Certificate forgery issue Object: Short term certificate holders and verifier Logic for problem-solving: The certificate verifier verifies that the holder ha

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-24 Thread Liuchunchi(Peter)
Hi carl, thank you very much for the detailed feedback, indeed some clarification are needed. Please see inline Peter From: Carl Wallace Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 11:32 PM To: Liuchunchi(Peter) ; acme@ietf.org Cc: acme-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Acme] new acme draft -- rats identifier

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-23 Thread Carl Wallace
I gave the draft a quick skim. I realize it is understood that much work remains but wanted to point out a few terminology issues and perhaps some gaps in the specs that might underpin this mechanism. 1)    That you have different challenge types to sustain the passport model and the

[Acme] Re: new acme draft -- rats identifier and challenge

2024-10-23 Thread Q Misell
Hi Peter! Thanks for your submission to the ACME working group. I'll start by admitting I don't really have much background knowledge on RATS so my comments may be mis-informed. Feel free to tell me I got it wrong. I think your draft is a good start - but needs a lot of work. First, some editori