6755226. Estonian VAT
> №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered
> trademarks in the UK, under № UK3718474 and № UK3718468,
> respectively.
>
>
> Ar Iau, 23 Ion 2025 am 00:59 Jared Crawford
> ysgrifennodd:
>
>> This assumes anycasted DNS,
, Porkuni küla, Lossi tn 1, 46001, trading as Glauca
> Digital, is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT
> №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered
> trademarks in the UK, under № UK3718474 and № UK3718468,
> respectively.
>
ay
> necessitate further DNS lookups if it is 30X redirected.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:21 PM Jared Crawford
> wrote:
>
>> I think that if the original web server is not involved, then it's not
>>> really
>>> doing authorization.
&
est out of N (even with a small N=3, this will shift p50 propagation
delay to be the p80 of single perspective).
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 2:52 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Jared Crawford wrote:
> > The 301 redirect works only for hostnames with publicly exposed
> webservers.
&
is a company registered in Estonia under № 16755226. Estonian VAT
> №: EE102625532. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered
> trademarks in the UK, under № UK3718474 and № UK3718468,
> respectively.
>
>
> Ar Gwen, 17 Ion 2025 am 19:55 Jared Crawford
> ysgrifennodd:
>
> I believe this would achieve all of the same benefits as you describe,
> except for "Reduced Exposure". At which point, I think it is reasonable to
> suggest that Applicants use the "dns-01" method if their goal is to get
> certificates for hostnames whose webservers are not publicly exposed.
Dear ACME Working Group,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to propose an extension to
the ACME protocol to enhance the http-01 challenge type by allowing
delegation to direct validation requests to a designated server similar to
what is possible for dns-01 challenges today via CNAME
