Re: [Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41

2021-05-24 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
think this is at the very limit of the number of plates I can spin. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:57 PM Daniel Migault wrote: > Thanks Phillip for the review. > > Yours, > Daniel > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:41 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.o

[Ace] Re: [Settle] IoT certificate profile vs TLS SNI and subjectAltName

2025-01-09 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
I am having difficulty seeing the value in this whole line of argument. What is the value in binding one random number (the public key) to an EUI-64? If we were writing some mechanism that would be acting on the network level, 802.1x or whatever, I could see some point. But even then, I am going

[Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41

2021-05-21 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker
Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker Review result: Ready This draft was previously reviewed by Steve Kent for the -27 version. My review therefore mostly consists of checking that the changes recommended have been made and that no new issues have arisen. Note that contrary to the data in the tracker