Marco Tiloca ; Francesca Palombini
>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
> IETF repository.
&
mm one.
Thanks,
Francesca
> -Original Message-
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: den 2 mars 2018 11:05
> To: Francesca Palombini
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-
> profile-02.txt
>
>
>
Title : OSCORE profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin
oupcomm-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm
Revision: 02
Title: Key Provisioning for Group Communication using ACE
Document date:
Hi Jim,
Thank you for your review comments. We agree with all your points, and have
opened issues: https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/issues to get this
fixed.
Inline some detailed answer.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 22/10/2018, 21:09, "Jim Schaad" wrote:
* Section 1 - I understand
you suggested,
it seems like a good idea to make this mechanism optional. We prepare for
discussion about this in Bangkok.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 25/10/2018, 23:25, "Jim Schaad" wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesca Palombini
> Sent: T
Hi Jim,
Thanks a lot for your detailed review, as you might have seen we have included
most comments in the latest version:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-02
Please note that this version includes also review comments from Peter, which
in some cases overlapped, s
Hi Peter,
Thanks a lot for this detailed review! We have uploaded a new version that
includes (most of) your
comments:https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palombini-ace-key-groupcomm-02
Detailed replies and some questions inline (see FP in red below).
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Ace mailto:ace-boun.
f the IETF.
Title : OSCORE profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Hi Roman, ACE,
Just a quick update on the OSCORE Profile, and some pointers.
The draft has been updated on the github according to the decisions taken at
IETF103. A review of this update by Jim (thanks Jim!) has brought on additional
(minor) changes. I am now making sure I have answered all of
zation for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin Gunnarsson
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-06.txt
Hi,
Following the adoption of ace-key-groupcomm and ace-key-groupcomm-oscore, we
have now made some updates, to be coherent with the updates to the OSCORE
profile. You can see the latest version of the draft, together with the diff to
latest submission, in the new github repositories:
https://
Hi Jim,
Inline.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 31/01/2019, 01:34, "Jim Schaad" wrote:
1. Please update the text for MUST/SHOULD/MAY to include the language from
RFC 8174.
FP: Right, thanks. Updated now in the github.
2. Section 3.2.1 - What to do is clear if a field is not miss
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Francesca Palombini
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 6:26 AM
> To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-oscore-
> prof...@ietf.org
> Cc: ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Shepard comments on draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
&
ts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : OSCORE profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Fran
Hi all,
TL;DR: Pub/sub and multicast hallway discussion happening at IETF104 (possibly
during the hackathon?). Slides here:
https://github.com/EricssonResearch/coap-pubsub-profile/blob/master/Pubsub-multicast.pdf
Contact me if interested.
As mentioned during the CoRE interim, I have started to
Hi Carsten,
Yes, the phrasing is not good on that slide... If you notice, the "proposals"
afterward point to a general "DoS protection mechanism". How that is done
really depends on the tools available, for example the broker might only send
notifications to subscribers that have been added to
minor editorials.
Feedback is welcome!
Thanks,
Francesca
On 03/04/2019, 15:29, "internet-dra...@ietf.org"
wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF
Hi,
Please enter your availability by this Friday, April 19th:
https://doodle.com/poll/ve7rnyareri2kqer
As Klaus said, the time slots are to chose for weekly meetings, so disregard
the exact dates in the doodle poll, but only consider the day of the week.
The goal is to restart the meetings by
+1
Francesca
On 23/04/2019, 08:38, "Ace on behalf of Ludwig Seitz" wrote:
On 22/04/2019 19:32, Jim Schaad wrote:
> At the meeting in Prague there was some discussion about adopting
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sengul-ace-mqtt-tls-profile/ as a
> working group docume
all calls, but the messages will serve as
reminders).
Thanks,
Francesca (as CBOR chair)
From: CBOR on behalf of Francesca Palombini
Date: Monday, 15 April 2019 at 17:44
To: Cose Wg , "c...@ietf.org WG" ,
"c...@ietf.org" , Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Ace] Doodle poll for v
Hi Jim,
Thanks again for your in depth review. We have identified 7 clear APs from some
of your review comments, and we hope that we answer the other (inline). Please
let us know if that is ok, and we will update the document as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Francesca and Marco
I was wandering thro
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your prompt reply! I cut out the comments that were okayed, and only
kept those that either are not okayed, need more discussion, or for which we
have proposed new APs following your response. Approved APs are now tracked as
github issues and we will be working on those in th
Hi Jim,
We have now added your review comments to the github issues, and we’ll get to
it. Below, the couple of comments that needed additional clarification (and
consequent APs).
Thank you again for the thorough review!
Francesca and Marco
2. Section 3.1 - "requester" seems to be an odd name for
Hi Marco,
Thanks a lot for this review! I finally managed to include your comments and
update the document, and will be posting a new version soon. You can see the PR
to this update here in the meantime:
https://github.com/EricssonResearch/coap-pubsub-profile/pull/2
Answers inline.
Thanks,
Fr
bini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile-05.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile
Revision: 05
Title: CoAP Pub-Sub Profile for Authentication and
Authoriza
airs: I would like to request 10 minutes at IETF105. I would be presenting,
in person.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 08/07/2019, 18:06, "internet-dra...@ietf.org"
wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-08.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palomb
is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : Key Provisioning for Group Communication using ACE
Authors
ubsub-profile-06.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile
Revision: 06
Title: CoAP Pub-Sub Profile for Authentication and
Authorization for Constrain
Hi Daniel,
You missed my request to present ace-key-groupcomm and coap-pubsub-profile. I’d
need 15 minutes for the first and 10 for the second.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Daniel Migault
Date: Tuesday, 5 November 2019 at 22:03
To: Cigdem Sengul
Cc: Ace Wg , Daniel Migault
Sub
Hi Ludwig,
Thank you so much for your detailed review! We have addressed your comments in
the -03 update submitted. It might be a bit hard to see from the diff, as we
also made a restructuring based on comments at IETF105, but I answer to
detailed comments inline.
Thanks again,
Francesca
On
Hi,
Answering the one issue left from Ludwig's review, including Jim's reaction
inline.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 23/07/2019, 14:56, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 7:22 AM
To: dra
Hi Peter!
Thanks for your comment. We will definitely go back to try to shorten and
remove duplicate text even more, I agree with you that we could do better there.
I might come back with questions on more precise advice once we give it another
try.
Thanks!
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Pe
Hi Cigdem,
Thanks a lot for your review and your support of this document! Your points are
very valid, and of course you are right with noticing that a revision is needed
to adapt the text to make it work for MQTT. I appreciate your comments about
topics hierarchy as well, that is something we
Hi,
This adoption call has ended a while ago, I am waiting for a conclusion before
submitting the next version of the document, also in view of next interim.
Hope you have a happy new year celebration,
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Daniel Migault
Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2019 at 09:45
T
.
* The draft itself has not been updated with the planned changes. I will
get back to it as soon as I am back from vacation.
Happy new year!
Francesca
--
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ace-pubsub-profile-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF
Hi,
Re: status update ace-key-groupcomm:
The document has been updated to v-04 in preparation for next week interim. The
update covers almost all review comments received, including what discussed at
IETF106.
From: Ace on behalf of Daniel Migault
Date: Friday, 24 January 2020 at 13:38
To: "
.
Once these are done, which we think could take a couple of submissions, if we
don’t get any negative feedback we could go for WGLC.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Francesca Palombini
Date: Monday, 27 January 2020 at 10:38
To: Daniel Migault ,
"ace-cha...@ietf.org"
Hi Ben,
Thank you so much for this very thorough and in-depth review!
I have started a PR (https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/pull/25 )
where I plan to include all the review comments. I have started with the
editorial fixes, which I have collected in one issue:
https://github.com/a
Hi Ben,
I am now done with updating the draft following most of your review comments.
Out of the 105, I have implemented 88 in the draft, while those left need
agreement in the wg as previously mentioned, or require your OK (see inline).
You can see the result of the update in the PR here:
htt
Hi,
Quick question regarding access token and scope.
I know that “scope” semantics is left to the application to define, but in
general I would expect to include there some information about resource and
method/operations allowed on that resource. Please correct me if any of this is
not exact.
, which I assume is 3.3.
Francesca
From: Mike Jones
Date: Friday, 21 February 2020 at 19:45
To: Jim Schaad , Francesca Palombini
, 'Seitz Ludwig'
Cc: Ace Wg
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Access token question
And https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8693#section-7.4, which registers “scope”
e on all now.
Thanks a lot!
Francesca
On 25/02/2020, 06:34, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote:
Hi Francesca,
Sorry to cut this so close to the wire...I was on vacation and came back to
a sizeable inbox.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:55:29PM +0000, Francesca Palombini wrote
Jim now I see, thanks for explaining.
Yes, we do need to send roles with the public keys, that makes sense. It also
makes sense to have this formatted with 2 arrays as Marco suggests. I’d also
make use of CBOR sequences:
<<( [ key1, key2, key3] , [role1, role2, [role1, role2] ] ) >> where ( ,
trained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : OSCORE profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Hi Ace chairs, DTLS authors, Ace framework authors, Ben,
TL;DR: we propose some changes on the OSCORE profile for the "update of access
rights" scenario. We have comments for the DTLS profile and the ACE framework
regarding this scenario, and we ask for feedback from ACE OSCORE implementers
and
ble
both unprotected and with OSCORE, but I think it is feasible (however not be my
in the ACE-Java codebase, @Marco?).
/Ludwig
-Original Message-
From: Francesca Palombini
Sent: den 5 maj 2020 15:37
To: Ace Wg ; Benjamin Kaduk ; Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-d
Hi Michael,
On 05/05/2020, 18:01, "Ace on behalf of Michael Richardson"
wrote:
Francesca Palombini
wrote:
> 7. Client wants to update its access rights: retrieves T2 from AS.
Note
> that this T2 has different authorization info, but does not contain
cation and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : Key Provisioning for Group Communication using ACE
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Marco Tiloca
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-key-groupc
Hi,
I’d like to take some time to get a conclusion on the “Update of access rights”
discussion started here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/dLkW-MYHXfZqmtY7AP7ZBDJpxOw/
(the result of this discussion would have an impact on ace framework and
profiles).
I’d also like to talk about ac
: OSCORE profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin Gunnarsson
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for this quick update! Just some short high level comments, to make sure
we can use this for ace-key-groupcomm-oscore.
In ace-key-groupcomm-oscore, we would say that Toid is the identifier of the
OSCORE group, so the OSCORE "group name", which is encoded as a bstr. For
Tperm
Hi,
I have reviewed the document and I believe this will be helpful for the work we
are doing in Ace. +1 for adoption.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Daniel Migault
Date: Monday, 22 June 2020 at 22:31
To: Ace Wg
Subject: [Ace] Call for adoption draft-tiloca-ace-oscore-gm-admin
Hi
ments (ACE)
Author : Francesca Palombini
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-pubsub-profile-01.txt
Pages : 21
Date: 2020-07-03
Abstract:
This specification defines an application profile for authentication
and authorization for
Hi Jim,
Thank you so much for another extensive review! We have submitted v-08 of the
draft to answer it.
Comments inline. If there is any answer/update that does not satisfy you,
hopefully we can continue the discussion by mail and figure out the major
points to discuss during IETF108.
Thanks
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your reply! Comments inline.
Francesca
On 16 July 2020 at 23:01:47 CEST, Jim Schaad wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesca Palombini
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:25 PM
> To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-key-
> groupc...@ietf.org
>
Hi,
I support adoption of this document, and believe Ace should adopt it. I am
willing to review, but I don't have any implementation plans.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 15/07/2020, 22:52, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote:
I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal req
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you so much for your review. We have now worked on all your comments in a
pull request, and will soon submit an update to the document. All the nits are
adressed in two commits:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/commit/a7f9483e96107a678b80217ba0b2d3dcfb488192
and
h
Hi Linda,
Thank you for your review. Ben has already clarified our aim for most of your
points, thanks Ben. I just want to add that we have now added some text to
clarify the CBOR formatting of Figure 7, you can see the diff here:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/commit/55d500a8922b
Hi,
This mail is to notify the WG of a minor change to the OSCORE profile. It was
brought up in the github issues by Christian (see:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/issues/40 ) and discussed offline
during IETF108 that the profile adds a requirement of the token always being
encry
Hi all,
I have two quick questions concerning IANA actions to be done for the OSCORE
profile:
1) The framework (-params) and the profile are currently conflicting on the
registration of parameters, and we need to fix that.
In the framework, parameters that are sent from Client to AS (such as re
istry is doubtful to me, since I don't see them being used in a
non-ACE OAuth context. Somewhere in the ACE registries?
2.) I would propose to put it on ACE page to be created for the framework
by IANA.
/Ludwig
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Francesc
The OSCORE profile needs around 10 minutes to agree on the IANA registration of
new parameters. I'll be presenting (but don't need slides).
Francesca
On 01/09/2020, 18:12, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote:
The chairs need to start building the agenda for next Monday. If you want
t
dra...@ietf.org"
wrote:
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-09.txt
has been successfully submitted by Francesca Palombini and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm
Revision: 09
Title: Key Pr
Hi,
I noticed a mistake in the current document, that escaped the several rounds of
review.
Figure 12 states that the ace_profile is supposed to have for value an unsigned
integer. The ACE Profile registry in Section 8.8 implies that the profile can
be both positive and negative integers.
Sam
And just to use the correct CBOR terminology, I indeed meant _unsigned and
negative_ seems to be allowed rather than just unsigned.
Francesca
On 10/09/2020, 10:38, "Francesca Palombini"
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a mistake in the current document, that escaped the several
Hi,
Thank you for this work! Here is my review of the document.
Thanks,
Francesca
The response includes the
parameters described in Section 5.6.2 of the ACE framework
[I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz].
The fact that the profile parameter with value "mqtt_tls" is included in this
response must
Hi all,
Following the discussions here and at the latest interim, I have submitted a
new version of the OSCORE profile. This version addresses the last call/post
last call comments: Gen ART review, the OPS Dir review, IANA comments and
John's review. Diff here:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?u
this might require clarifications in the framework either way.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Cigdem Sengul
Date: Sunday, 20 September 2020 at 23:02
To: Francesca Palombini
Cc: Ace Wg , “draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org”
Subject: Re: WGLC review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-07
Hello
not send the parameter if the
value is non-empty”. Also Cigdem maybe has a better proposal on how to clarify,
since she interpreted the text that way.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Seitz Ludwig
Date: Thursday, 24 September 2020 at 15:39
To: Francesca Palombini , Cigdem Sengul
Cc: "draft-ietf-ace
Hi Daniel,
We believe we can address Christian’s comments by next IETF meeting. We will
request some time on the agenda to present the update and discuss any open
point.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Daniel Migault
Date: Thursday, 15 October 2020 at 20:35
To: Francesca Palombini
Cc: Ace Wg
essentially the same
functionality can be obtained.
Would it be sufficient to clarify the differences as above to address your
comment?
Thanks,
Göran
On 2020-10-09, 17:45, "Christian Amsüss" wrote:
Hello Francesca, hello ACE group,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020
vironments Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin Gunnarsson
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-13.txt
Pages : 32
Hi Daniel,
We’d like to request 15 minutes to discuss updates on ace-key-groupcomm at
IETF109.
Thanks,
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of Daniel Migault
Date: Tuesday, 13 October 2020 at 18:33
To: Ace Wg
Subject: [Ace] Call for agenda item for IETF 109
Hi,
The Ace WG will meet during IETF 1
detailed answers.
Thanks again!
Francesca
From: Marco Tiloca
Date: Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 17:04
To: , Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-13.txt
Resent from:
Resent to: Francesca Palombini ,
, Göran Selander ,
Resent date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 08:03:54 -0800 (PST
ts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : OSCORE Profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained Environments Framework
Authors : Fran
, 2020 at 09:58:21AM +0000, Francesca Palombini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This update answers Marco's latest review (thanks Marco!), answering all
comments received as WGLC.
>
> Thanks,
> Francesca
>
> On 14/12/2020, 09:49, "A
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Cigdem Sengul
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-pubsub-profile-02.txt
Pages : 21
Date: 2021-01-03
Abstract:
This specification defines an application profile for auth
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin Gunnarsson
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-16.txt
Pages : 33
Date: 2021-01-28
Hi Olaf,
When I read the draft I don't see how the change is reflected in your summary,
actually your summary shows no difference between OSCORE and DTLS profile,
while actually there is one. This is the difference we are discussing in the
DTLS profile, about secure communication between Client
Hi,
I am fine with Daniel's change to the DTLS profile (which wants to add
motivation on why the DTLS profile is RECOMMENDED), and prefer Göran's
formulation to the Ace framework.
I had to think about it and figured out where the different interpretations
come from, and hence what needs to be
March 2021 at 17:49
To: Göran Selander
Cc: Stefanie Gerdes , Olaf Bergmann ,
Francesca Palombini , Russ Mundy
, "draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org"
, Loganaden Velvindron
Subject: Re: [Ace] secdir review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-14
HI Goran,
sure any wordsmithing / alter
Hi Ludwig,
Thanks for the quick reply! Both updates sound good and address my comments.
Francesca
On 25/03/2021, 08:22, "Seitz Ludwig" wrote:
Hello Francesca,
Thank you for your review. I have some comments inline.
/Ludwig
>
age-
> From: Ace On Behalf Of Francesca Palombini via
> Datatracker
> Sent: den 24 mars 2021 15:50
> To: The IESG
> Cc: art-...@ietf.org; ace-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-
> au...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Ace] Frances
JSON string containing the mandatory "AS" parameter, and the optional
parameters "audience", "kid", "cnonce", and "scope" as defined in
Section 5.1.2 of the ACE framework"
Kind regards,
--Cigdem
On Thu
Ciao
Hannes
PS: I will dig out discussion with the OAuth group on the issue of PoP
tokens and how to request a PoP token with HTTP over the client-to-AS interface
to then present it via a different transport to the RS.
-Original Message-
From: Francesca Palombini
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you very much for the in depth review! We have incorporated your changes
in the newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/co
Hi Roman!
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github commits:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/com
Hi Murray!
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github commit:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/com
Hi Zahed,
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github:
https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-oscore-profile/commit/e234
Hi Lars,
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 ,
including many good changes from the GenART review from Elwyn.
Answers inline.
Thanks again,
Francesca
On 25/03
Framework
Authors : Francesca Palombini
Ludwig Seitz
Göran Selander
Martin Gunnarsson
Filename: draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18.txt
Pages : 34
Date:
Hi Ludwig, authors,
Thank you for all the work on the document.
I have checked all my comments (including those that you have addressed in v-39
and not reported below), and I am good with almost all of them.
Considering the clarifications added as a response to my comments regarding
CoAP usi
tion 3.2
of oauth-params.
Francesca
On 27/05/2021, 13:25, "Olaf Bergmann" wrote:
Hi Francesca,
Did you have chance to take another look at comment #3 of your review
(see below)?
Grüße
Olaf
On 2021-05-11, Stefanie Gerdes wrote:
>
> On 3/24/21 4:4
Hi Olaf,
Right! Somehow I managed to miss the « response » from the « access token
response ».
Thanks for the answers, it all looks good to me and ready to ship.
Francesca
On 8 June 2021 at 11:59:19 CEST, Olaf Bergmann wrote:
Hi Francesca,
On 2021-06-08, Francesca Palombini wrote
t
Cc: ace-cha...@ietf.org; Ludwig Seitz ;
art-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org; The IESG
; Seitz Ludwig ; ace@ietf.org;
Francesca Palombini
Subject: Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Carsten,
I like your proposals! I changed a "define" to "specify" to remove some
repetition, so finally the text change would be the following:
OLD:
There may be use cases were different profiles of this framework are
combined. For example, an MQTT-TLS profile is used between the
cl
New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
> Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : Key Provisioning for Group Communication using ACE
>
Jean: thank you very much for your thoughtful review! Cigdem, thank you for
addressing it, I do believe it improves the document.
Just one note: for the downref to informative documents (for those documents
that were actually included in the text), please revert the change – RFC 6234
and RFC 80
Designated expert that is not yet
assigned).
Francesca
From: Cigdem Sengul
Date: Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 12:57
To: Francesca Palombini
Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org
, ace-cha...@ietf.org
, Ace Wg , Daniel Migault
, Carsten Bormann
Subject: Re: Francesca
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
