Hi Christian,
Yes, the second form is a correct example while the first form is not
compatible with EDHOC, which does not admit "naked" COSE Keys as
authentication credentials.
In general, the CWT confirmation method (i.e., the 'cnf' type) has to be
consistent with an authentication credenti
Hi Christian,
If I understand correctly, you are proposing the following optimization:
* In the EDHOC and OSCORE profile, it can be allowed that 'req_cnf',
'rs_cnf', and 'cnf' specify "COSE_Key" (1) as CWT Confirmation Method.
* When doing so, the consumer of 'req_cnf', 'rs_cnf', or 'cnf' mus
