[Ace] Re: Plain COSE_Key in draft-ietf-ace-edhoc-oscore-profile

2024-12-12 Thread Christian Amsüss
Hello ACE-EDHOC authors, On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 11:45:58AM +0100, Christian Amsüss wrote: > The "maybe a subject claim" is critical here: If a COSE_Key were used > raw, the recipient would have no way of knowing whether or not a subject > key, let alone with which value, should be in the KCCS tha

[Ace] Plain COSE_Key in draft-ietf-ace-edhoc-oscore-profile

2024-12-12 Thread Christian Amsüss
Hi authors, using the EDHOC profile has shown that there's some temptation to return a token like this: { e'scope': b'...', e'cnf': { e'COSE_Key/1': { e'kty': ... } } } and the draft has not nudged that developer towards what is a practical requirement, being th

[Ace] Re: Adoption call for draft-tiloca-ace-authcred-dtls-profile

2024-12-12 Thread Rikard Höglund
Hello. I've read the document and support its adoption. It is a logical step to take in order to enable using additional credential formats for the ACE DTLS profile. Best Rikard Höglund From: Tim Hollebeek Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 19:49 To: ace@ietf.org