[Ace] Re: Clarification on RFC9200: May client set ace_profile!=null?

2024-12-09 Thread Göran Selander
Hi Christian, Good questions. As I recall, the mindset for this was that the AS should have the necessary information about the capability of RS and the intended use of the resources, to decide which profile to use. This also simplified the protocol, where the only alternative given was that th

[Ace] Re: Clarification on RFC9200: May client set ace_profile!=null?

2024-12-09 Thread Christian Amsüss
Hi Göran! On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:46:06AM +, Göran Selander wrote: > Good questions. As I recall, the mindset for this was that the AS > should have the necessary information about the capability of RS and > the intended use of the resources, to decide which profile to use. > This also simp

[Ace] Re: Clarification on RFC9200: May client set ace_profile!=null?

2024-12-09 Thread Göran Selander
Hi Christian, Inline. On 2024-12-09, 12:33, "Christian Amsüss" wrote: Hi Göran! On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:46:06AM +, Göran Selander wrote: > Good questions. As I recall, the mindset for this was that the AS > should have the necessary information about the capability of RS and

[Ace] Re: Adoption call for draft-tiloca-ace-authcred-dtls-profile

2024-12-09 Thread Göran Selander
Hi, I’ve read the draft and I support adoption. The authentication credentials used in RFC 9202 is unnecessarily restricted and the specified extension is straightforward. Göran From: Renzo Navas Date: Saturday, 7 December 2024 at 10:13 To: Tim Hollebeek Cc: ace@ietf.org Subject: [Ace] Re: