[Ace] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (7982)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8392, "CBOR Web Token (CWT)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7982 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Christian Amsüss Secti

[Ace] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (7982)

Hi Paul, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). You may review the rep

[Ace] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (7982)

Any volunteers to confirm this errata and check the entire RFC for similar errors ? :) Paul > On Jun 11, 2024, at 12:26 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8392, > "CBOR Web Token (CWT)". > > -- > You may re

[Ace] Re: Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (7982)

Hello Paul and ACE, I have checked this reported erratum and all the examples in Appendix A. * First off, I think that the fix proposed in this reported erratum is correct. * I believe that there is another error, exactly in the same example of Appendix A.2.2.   Consistent with the inten