Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-oscore-00

Hi Marco, I created potential resolutions for the remaining open points in this draft in a series of short PRs in the current repository. Could you take a look at these and see if these resolve your comments? @chairs: Could you create a repository for “est-oscore” under github.com/ace-wg

Re: [Ace] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)

Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:09:03PM +0200, Christian Amsüss wrote: >> Hi Michael, (CC'ing ACE list because what I think will be the larger >> part of the thread is hopefully relevant) >> >> > > there a generalization of the IEEE identifiers that also mak

Re: [Ace] [Anima] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)

Christian Amsüss wrote: > Yes, that's the way I'd hope they could be used. For example, if a > device were onboarded into an ACE domain with three AS that's using the > ACE-OSCORE profile with the devices, they'd obtain three symmetric keys > with a key identifier h'00', h'01' and

Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-oscore-00

Hi Mališa, I've reviewed them and they look overall good to me. Please check the comments I left on PR #10, PR #14, and PR #15. Best, /Marco On 2023-05-26 17:24, Mališa Vučinić wrote: Hi Marco, I created potential resolutions for the remaining open points in this draft in a series of short

Re: [Ace] [Anima] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)

> On May 26, 2023, at 1:18 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > >> Is that identity now an LDevID (even though it has a completely >> different shape than the IDevID), or is a certificate based LDevID >> still created as part of the process, or can the device happily >> complete the ANIMA processes

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 1:15 PM Mohit Sahni wrote: > Hi Paul, > I think you may be looking at the older version of the draft. (Please > check > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport) > Odd, I was and I wasn't. Maybe a caching issue. Thanks for pointing out mos

Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-10.txt

Thanks Paul and others for moving this document forward! Yours, Daniel From: Ace on behalf of Paul Wouters Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 3:33 PM To: Mohit Sahni Cc: Daniel Migault; Brockhaus, Hendrik; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] I-D Action: draft-ietf-

Re: [Ace] [Anima] ANIMA and ACE, IDevID terminology (was: Re: cBRSKI)

Russ Housley wrote: >>> Is that identity now an LDevID (even though it has a completely >>> different shape than the IDevID), or is a certificate based LDevID >>> still created as part of the process, or can the device happily >>> complete the ANIMA processes without an LDevID?