Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

2024-01-25 Thread Dan Garcia Carrillo
Great, thank you. Best regards. El 25/1/24 a las 14:26, Deb Cooley escribió: My 5.1 comment:  I skimmed RFC 4017 and it seems sufficient.  I also looked to see if EAP methods include it as a reference (and many of them do).  It is my opinion that w/ the addition of a reference and some clari

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

2024-01-25 Thread Deb Cooley
My 5.1 comment: I skimmed RFC 4017 and it seems sufficient. I also looked to see if EAP methods include it as a reference (and many of them do). It is my opinion that w/ the addition of a reference and some clarifying text will allow you to claim that the MSK is a 'strong cryptographic key', and

Re: [Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

2024-01-25 Thread Dan Garcia Carrillo
Dear Deb, Thank you for the update on the review. Please let us comment inline. El 23/1/24 a las 13:07, Deb Cooley via Datatracker escribió: Reviewer: Deb Cooley Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF docum

[Ace] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-09

2024-01-23 Thread Deb Cooley via Datatracker
Reviewer: Deb Cooley Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG