The committee is forming a subcommittee to finalize committee membership,
which will then create a standard with which you can put things on top of
other things. The committee will be made up of thing-putters who each have
their own implementation, and we'll leave a good portion of the details
"imp
The project will still go down as one of bitter in fighting, name calling,
ego stroking, chaos wrapped up in a book you need to purchase for $250 USD
(plus tax & shipping) in order to put things...
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:17 PM, J.R. Mauro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:11 PM, David Leimb
If you have to go to this level, wouldn't it be better to have a language
for this? You probably wouldn't want this interactively, prototyping aside.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:41 PM, John Stalker wrote:
> > so I'm writing to get your opinions. maybe there are thing that people
> > implement thems
what, no SOAP? Not enterprise ready.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:43 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> i propose an extension to HTTP (call it HTTPeeLite) which allows me to
> specify in my request to that webpage the format in which i prefer to
> receive the man page. a 'setup' exchange can be sent be
They also have REBOL as a scripting language...
It's an interesting project, forked from an interesting project (Atheos),
but Gospodin Floren is correct: they have exactly the same problems with
Syllable as 9fans have with Plan9, namely drivers & user expectations.
Haiku, ReactOS, Hurd, &c &c hav
What, no HQ9+?
H
Having "Hello, world!" as a semantic & syntactic element in the language
serves as the ridiculous part...
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:26 AM, ron minnich wrote:
>
>> See this: http://www.wxwidgets.org/docs/tutorials
I use chibi at work; s'not bad considering the size, & certainly better than
tinyscheme. I currently use a custom dialect for new stuff, but the old is
either Chibi or Gauche.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Iruata Souza wrote:
>
>> O
Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I
haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not
terribly insane, that would be a decent route. Most CL work that isn't
specific to one of the proprietary systems (Allegro, LispWorks, &c.) is
written
Clozure might be enough as well; it's C, but I've no idea how many POSIXisms
are in the source...
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 PM, John Floren wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums
> wrote:
>
I was going to use SBCL to cross compile SBCL for Plan9.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 AM, John Floren wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums
> wrote:
> > Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I
> > haven't looked
LtU has an overview, for those interested:
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3613
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> It's probably a bit hypocriticalist of me to post anything off-topic
> at this point, but why break the habits of a lifetime?
>
> Some people here might en
Like shuffle db (i.e. no iTunes).
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
> >> we'd have been much better off if Apple had instead spent the
> >> time and effort writing a decent iTunes
>
> And no doubt we'd have been much better off if Apple had instead spent the
> time and effor
Oberon had POINTER TO, and acted in what you might expect from a
TurboPascal.
Also, wrt pointers, the original Primos was written in Fortran IV, although
it was later moved to the PL/I dialect PL/P.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:13 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > Because it is constantly compared wit
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Patrick Kelly wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> * Jorden Mauro wrote:
>>
>> The coffee pot runs windows and there is a virus that causes Coffee
>>> Denial of Service on it.
>>>
>>
>> That, of course, would be the very most worstcase
x: proc options(main);
put skip list('What's Wrong with PR1ME?');
put skip;
end x;
/* sorry, couldn't resist */
I mean, you make it sound like the wonderful combination of Fortran IV, PL/I
(PL/1G, PL/P & SPL), Pascal & BASIC (BASICV too) weren't enough!
Sheesh, this is perfectly resonable:
OK, pl
Actually, there is a decent amount of noise over switching back to UUCP or
the like to avoid the types of restrictions governments & corporations are
attempting to put on the 'net. Can't wait. :|
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you have to love comca
Well they took Cyclone & made Vault C, so they might as well go along with
Inferno/Plan9 too. Interestingly enough, Singularity is written in Sing#,
yet another MS-specific language. ugh. I think F# is the only thing to have
recently escaped MSR (well, besides LINQ, although they killed Comega).
"Electric Sheep" by John Scalzi is a very humorous play on Dick's wonderful
"Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep". Anathem is good, but Snow Crash &
Diamond Age equally as good, & have faster pacing. "The Hostile Takeover
Trilogy", everything written by William Gibson, "The Electric Church",
Asimov
Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for some time,
but I've much else on my hands. One day when free...
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:28 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > I seem to remember Mjl, the author if the inferno ircfs, wrote an
> > ircfs for Plan 9 ages ago. Still, s
Uh, considering that ircfs is for Inferno (via Limbo), having a Limbo
compiler to native Plan9 would be a potential solution, assuming the run
time could be kept the same.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for so
Well, actually, I was thinking of something along the lines of Lisaac:
"dynamic" modules are statically compiled ala object files, & the run time
handles issues between Plan9 & Inferno. Sys->load & the like would not be
dynamic, but would work as expected. Hell, it could even just be a
.Net/perl2ex
Inline
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:52 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > Well, actually, I was thinking of something along the lines of Lisaac:
> > "dynamic" modules are statically compiled ala object files, & the run
> time
> > handles issues between Plan9 & Inferno. Sys->load & the like would not be
>
Is lsub down or permanently gone? I was looking for some of the CLive
papers to show a friend, and the site has sorta disappeared from the
internet.
--
And in the "Only Prolog programmers will find this funny" department:
Q: How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: No.
I have that starred, but that's perfect, thank you Rodrigo!
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 7:31 AM Rodrigo G. López
wrote:
> github.com/fjballest/clive
>
> that might be of help while lsub.org is down.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020, 1:09 PM LiteStar numnums wrote:
>
>> Is lsu
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, EBo wrote:
> > confused boxes
> > emdashes turned into mud
> > double conversion?
> >
> > http://9fans.net/archive/2010/06/187
>
> should I read this as poetry or a question?
>
> EBo --
>
>
>
The haiku is short a syllable on the first line, unless you prono
> To add to the madness you can write XML files that translate XML files to
> other files (possibly other XML files) in an XML defined language called
> XSLT. XSLT is a bit like writing in a functional programming language with
> the worst syntax possible :-).
>
> The reason I say "worst syntax po
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 2:43 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>
> as long as you don't care about the (observed) 100:1 ratio of XML glop
> to data in, e.g., the Python XMLRPC stuff, it's great. Yep, I observed
> that ratio when Xen made the cut to XML-
27 matches
Mail list logo
