[CC += 9fans@]
Hi Jacob,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 03:51:13PM -0600, Jacob Moody wrote:
> On 2/9/25 14:59, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found a few addresses inspecting both the 9front and plan9port git
> > repositories. If you think anyone else --or any mailing list-- should
>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:05:58AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > These days I think we like to
> > have a fairly good reason to grow the list of 9front idiosyncrasies
> > compared to the
> > original plan 9 for core interfaces like this.
>
> I'd say having this bad API being code is in itse
[Dropped onf@ per their request; updated Ken's address]
Hi Jacob,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 06:21:42PM -0600, Jacob Moody wrote:
> >> In general 9front specific comments should go to the 9front list
> >> 9fr...@9front.org
> >> more general questions regarding any sort of plan 9 may be best sent to
Hi!
GCC implements Plan9 C extensions, and has a bug by which it allows
discarding qualifiers without a cast. I'm wondering if this is a bug
only in GCC, or if it's a bug also in Plan9. Anyone using a Plan9
compiler can check this code and let me know if it diagnoses about the
qualifier drop?
