Hello Aidan,
I have started to look more closely at the various implementations
(Realtek provided, NetBSD --- indirectly from OpenBSD --- and Linux)
and your patch and I think we are on the same tracks.
Realtek uses the two masks for the macver: 0xFCF0 to do what is
done (limitedly) with the
Quoth tlaro...@kergis.com:
>
> More generally, wouldn't it be more clear to use PCI_VENDOR_ID, PCI_DEVICE_ID,
> etc. from a header instead of the hardcoded values? (that may be hard
> to grep to find if support is there or not---I missed at first that
> there is a U.S. Robotics card with a Realtek
So who’s planning to go? I think we should get started coordinating the
lodging so we can get the flights ahead of time too. https://iwp9.org/#loc says
“To be provided”. If we’re just going to get Airbnb’s and such on our own,
that’s fine with me, and I could share with someone.
Sorry to both
I am still interested in helping, but life has been throwing curve balls.
So I've been a bit preoccupied.
I'll see if I can have a look at some of the simpler stuff this weekend. At
least setup a test environment.
*--*
*"The best programs are the ones written when the programmer is supposed to
be
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 03:00:46PM -0400, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
> Quoth tlaro...@kergis.com:
> >
> > More generally, wouldn't it be more clear to use PCI_VENDOR_ID,
> > PCI_DEVICE_ID,
> > etc. from a header instead of the hardcoded values? (that may be hard
> > to grep to find if support is
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 12:46:55PM -0700, Aidan K. Wiggins via 9fans wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> > Realtek uses the two masks for the macver: 0xFCF0 to do what is
> > done (limitedly) with the macver on the current driver, and to set the
> > MACFG (MAC firmware conFiG?) type. The second mask 0x7C
Quoth Aidan K. Wiggins via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>:
> If it weren't for these non-realtek chips, I think we would just use
> switch(did){}.
Ugh. yes. I figure it'd be fine to add
enum {
/*
* Some realtek chips are sold with
* the US roboti
Hi Thierry,
> Realtek uses the two masks for the macver: 0xFCF0 to do what is
> done (limitedly) with the macver on the current driver, and to set the
> MACFG (MAC firmware conFiG?) type. The second mask 0x7C80 is used
> to refine with subconfiguration. I think we should do the same: the
>
Hrm,
I see what you mean, I think their usage of 0xFC80 is to catch the
higher bits in older cards, looking specifically at the definitions
for the 8110 family in the linux driver. It seems that up to this
point all the cards defined in our driver can be recognized with
0x7C[8F]0, but if s
I'll try to throw together a TODO.md this week for people to work from.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 5:48 AM Christopher Nielsen
wrote:
> I am still interested in helping, but life has been throwing curve balls.
> So I've been a bit preoccupied.
>
> I'll see if I can have a look at some of the simpler
10 matches
Mail list logo
