On 2/9/25 17:05, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> [CC += 9fans@]
>
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 03:51:13PM -0600, Jacob Moody wrote:
>> On 2/9/25 14:59, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I found a few addresses inspecting both the 9front and plan9port git
>>> repositories. If you
(Possibly pointless me-too.) I also wrote something similar:
https://github.com/rjkroege/oneserve -- it has upload, download and
directory listings.
Rob.
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 01:58:29 +0900, ron minnich said:
> webbox looks quite nice, thanks for the tip!
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 5:51 AM sirjofr
[CC += 9fans@]
Hi Jacob,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 03:51:13PM -0600, Jacob Moody wrote:
> On 2/9/25 14:59, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I found a few addresses inspecting both the 9front and plan9port git
> > repositories. If you think anyone else --or any mailing list-- should
>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:05:58AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > These days I think we like to
> > have a fairly good reason to grow the list of 9front idiosyncrasies
> > compared to the
> > original plan 9 for core interfaces like this.
>
> I'd say having this bad API being code is in itse
I don't want to blow up the OS interference discussion too much, so I'll
just refer you to the slides I shared or the classic 2003 paper,
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1592958.
Short form: 2048 4-cpu alpha systems, quadrics interconnect, had lpd
running. lpd woke up every 30s to realize it
NIX this evening. Test on 4 core laptop.
fshalt -r does not end well on my laptop; it's the usual issue with drivers
not dealing that well with a warm reset, and hardware being hard.
So: I modified bootrc to drop me into rc before it starts mounting file
systems and such. I added execac to the im
Two questions I am wondering about:
1. Is this still limited to x86 only, as I think was suggested on an
earlier thread related to this effort, or has it been generalized to
work across other CPU architectures?
2. As this evidently needs to be "enabled" by configuring processors to
act as A
Frank, while NIX is limited to x86, for now, the four key functions are
pretty compact, and I'm planning to get it working on other architectures,
or help others interested, as interest allows. I've got no love for the x86
and the x86 vendors at this point.
In terms of whether NIX goes into 9front
very interesting. is this interference metric normalized taking the
efficiency of the system into account?
e.g. if on one platform 2x as much work is done (for example because the
core frequency is doubled), i wouldn't be surprised if absolute
interference doubles, but in relation to the work being
is both the text and the image AI generated, or only the image?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 3:06 AM Conor Williams
wrote:
> heres one with a handheld...
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 7:23 PM Skip Tavakkolian <
> skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you. It looks like it has been rolled out alr
FWIW, I'm still interested but I'm late with my home work---I have
just sent the iw9p wip PDF almost on the deadline...
I will start to gather your late explanations to update the
documentation that I have started, and will switch to the new git
repository, in order to resume testing, preferably o
Sorry for the stream of consciousness that follows (kinda or I wouldn’t post it)Generally, on time slicing systems you cannot simply assign threads to cores 1:1 and expect to get the best efficiency for a long running process. Usually your wall clock times end up being reduced by oversubscribing C
12 matches
Mail list logo
