Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M4e50b3b8d6464665cbeb69f0
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups
Quoth Aram Hăvărneanu :
> Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.
>
aaarch64
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-Mb04f6def466eab98af0afb47
Deli
The compiler appears to be called 7c.
adr, looking at the original email on this thread, it is not very clear
what you are trying to ask?
On 5/21/22 12:39 PM, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
Quoth Aram Hăvărneanu :
Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.
a
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote:
Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.
I wasn't talking about any compiler. Yes, you can call your compiler
whatever you want. You can call it shitarm, just don't tell me that
the 64-bit Armv8-A architecture is calle
On Sat, 21 May 2022, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
aaarch64
Thanks, really helpful.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-Me37f9be21d8fd00ceef174c2
Delivery options: https://9fans.t
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:12 PM adr wrote:
> I wasn't talking about any compiler.
Choosing $objtype (and $O, etc) is the first thing someone writing
a new Plan 9 compiler port does. These values are set in libmach.
I suggest reading the 2c(1) manual page, as well as the Plan 9
compiler papers whi
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 1:13 PM adr wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote:
> > Since Charles wrote the arm64 compiler, he can call it whatever he wants.
>
> I wasn't talking about any compiler. Yes, you can call your compiler
> whatever you want. You can call it shitarm, just don't
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Frank D. Engel, Jr. wrote:
The compiler appears to be called 7c.
adr, looking at the original email on this thread, it is not very clear what
you are trying to ask?
There is no 7c on labs' , there is no patch for aarch64, arm64 or
whatever you want to call it in 9legacy.
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:54 PM adr wrote:
>
> There is no 7c on labs' , there is no patch for aarch64, arm64 or
> whatever you want to call it in 9legacy. There is no kernel for
> any aarch64 machine on labs/legacy. Seriously, what is so hard to
> understand in this frase:
>
Perhaps you should f
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Aram H?v?rneanu wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 7:12 PM adr wrote:
I wasn't talking about any compiler.
Choosing $objtype (and $O, etc) is the first thing someone writing
a new Plan 9 compiler port does. These values are set in libmach.
I suggest reading the 2c(1) manual
It's easy but you're complicated.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M4820b11cc08bf4aa0d58cc4d
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in either
9legacy or the Bell Labs distribution.
- Dan C.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M8dc571703e5960d0f3c631f5
Delivery opti
On Sat, 21 May 2022, Dan Cross wrote:
To answer your original question, no: there is no aarch64 support in either
9legacy or the
Bell Labs distribution.
- Dan C.
I just ported 7c, 7l and 7a from 9front. I'm adjusting libmach,
mkfiles, etc. Porting 9front's aarch64 raspberry pi kernel
13 matches
Mail list logo
