David du Colombier writes:
> I think the issue is elsewhere, since I've tried on QEMU with
> both Virtio 1.0 and Virtio legacy and it worked as expected
> (386 and amd64 kernels).
That could very well be. vmm(4) is still relatively young, so the
bug could very well be there. I think at this point
>> I think the issue is elsewhere, since I've tried on QEMU with
>> both Virtio 1.0 and Virtio legacy and it worked as expected
>> (386 and amd64 kernels).
>
> That could very well be. vmm(4) is still relatively young, so the
> bug could very well be there. I think at this point we've ruled
> out
David du Colombier writes:
> If it works with 9front, the issue is definitely on our side.
> Our Virtio drivers are very close to 9front's, so I suspect
> the issue may be somewhere else.
If you think that's the case then I need to build out enough local
infrastructure to be able to build 9legacy
Hello there! I am Resun. I was trying to use internet in Plan9 but I am always
unable to load a page in abaco. After a lots of trying I managed to get
connected to the internet but in abaco I am getting this error:
[cid:image002.png@01D80B9C.CA07EB70]
Can someone please help get rid of this?
Th
li looks like you are not running ndb/dns.
you need to start this before webfs, and then start abaco after that.
sadly the web has moved on a but since abaco was written - it used to render
most pages quite well. These days its lack of javascript is more and more of a
problem.
-Steve
On 17 J
Hello. I just found out about Plan 9 and I'm trying to understand more. I see
that 9front is often called a fork of Plan 9. However, reading the FAQ and the
9front wiki, the authors seem to often "conflate" both. I mean, I don't really
understand what's written, but it's like the instructions fo
Quoth matthpmore...@gmail.com:
Hello. I just found out about Plan 9 and I'm trying to understand more.
I see that 9front is often called a fork of Plan 9. However, reading
the FAQ and the 9front wiki, the authors seem to often "conflate" both.
I mean, I don't really understand what's written, b
Quoth matthpmore...@gmail.com:
> I know it's subjective, but a fork implies to me that the goals and
> methods of the forking developers are different from the original
> software, maybe eventually leading to a completely contrasted
> software, with different environment, tools and inner workings,
@Humm: I understand that Android isn't a fork of Linux, I meant to imply that
although Android is argued to be a Linux distro, they have very different
environments that can't easily interact with each other. I also know that the
meaning of forking is objective, I meant that forking invokes the
Quoth Matt :
> @ori: Those are examples of forked software that happened because of the
> discontinuation of the original software, right?
No.
Most of the originals were around
after the fork, at least for a while.
Many of them are still around. In
some cases, it's the fork that didn't
make it.
But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even though
Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry that one day
they become too different, especially since the community is rather centered
around Plan 9 rather than 9front? Or is the community active
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:31 AM Matt wrote:
>
> But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even
> though Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry
> that one day they become too different, especially since the community is
> rather centered arou
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 6:32 PM Matt wrote:
>
> But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even
> though Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry
> that one day they become too different, especially since the community is
> rather centered aroun
On Monday, January 17, 2022, at 8:36 PM, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
9front. One of the reasons is that it actually works and is still
being developed and used by many. Plan 9 is dead, 9front lives on.
There is also softwar
if there's any branch of plan9 missing in 9front please just send the
patch or a reminder.
On 1/18/22, Matt wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 17, 2022, at 8:36 PM, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
> wrote:
>> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
> 9front. One of the reasons is
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:36:19AM +0100, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
>
> I'm afraid you got it wrong. Community is mostly centered around
> 9front. One of the reasons is that it actually works and is still
> being developed and used by many. Plan 9 is dead, 9front lives on.
> There is als
On 17/01/2022 23:36, Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:31 AM Matt wrote:
But that's why 9front was forked, right? They say it on their FAQ. Even though
Plan 9 isn't being developed anymore, doesn't the fork cause worry that one day
they become too different, espe
17 matches
Mail list logo
