On 4 September 2021 08:27:21 CEST, Lucio De Re wrote:
> The combination of (IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad) T60 chassis and T61 mother
> board is known as FrankenPad, I learnt since I bought a none too well
> refurbished Lenovo T61 7659-CTO laptop for a moderate price. I had
> long wished I could get a T61,
Not sure if it's wasted/duplicate effort but I had been interested in porting
QuickJS (it has ES 2020 support) Eventually I stopped doing this since there is
Duktape (within Netsurf) and Goja now support some of the most common ES6
features. Also my C knowledge/porting experience is quite limite
i will bite
i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a current
synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc.
the biggest pain is the wireshark disector is buggy and there is no real
documentation for the protocol.
not really selling it am i?
-Steve
--
Quoth Conor Williams :
> anyone got a list/one project to work on...
> i'm not too shoddy at the auld porting etc...cw
Find something you want to use, and make it work.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Td6b6b3e98268ecde-M
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 10:04 AM Philip Silva via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
>
> Not sure if it's wasted/duplicate effort but I had been interested in porting
> QuickJS (it has ES 2020 support) Eventually I stopped doing this since there
> is Duktape (within Netsurf) and Goja now support some
> i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a
> current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc.
the guy behind synergy at some point tried to convert his free
software project into a startup for making money.
even before that transition he was a hell to send patches to
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier
> On Sep 4, 2021, at 9:19 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a
>> current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc.
>
> the guy behind synergy at some point tried to convert his
i was going to mention barrier but couldn’t remember it’s name. as far as the
plan9 code goes they should both work - the only difference being the initial
handshake message.
current synergy supports many new features but plan9 is not interested.
the problem is really the lack of documentatio
it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway.
mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple
plan9, given that /dev/mouse is already network transparent.
also, when you want other systems, with drawterm the /dev/mouse of the
alien OS window is already made available. sho
On 04/09/2021, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway.
> mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple
> plan9, given that /dev/mouse is already network transparent.
I can't think how Plan 9 would work as a server (as in, the machi
lot's of good stuff there /c:ta
On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 9:57 PM Stuart Morrow
wrote:
> On 04/09/2021, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > it's worth doing the plan9 specific protocol anyway.
> > mainly bec. it could be very simple to implement, between multiple
> > plan9, given that /dev/mouse
11 matches
Mail list logo
