Re: [9fans] what heavy negativity!

2018-10-07 Thread Digby R.S. Tarvin
ooh, there's an idea for new project... I also have a soft spot for the old PDP11 architecture and aesthetics, and like the idea of an emulator sitting behind an 11/70 front panel, but I havn't been able to decide what software to run on it... Unix ran quite nicely on an 11/70 back in the late 70

[9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!)

2018-10-07 Thread Lucio De Re
On 10/8/18, Digby R.S. Tarvin wrote: > > So the question is... is plan9 still lean and mean enough to fit onto a > machine with a 64K address space? Doing a port would certainly provide > plenty of opportunity to tinker with the lights and switches on front > panel, and if it the port was initiall

Re: [9fans] what heavy negativity!

2018-10-07 Thread Lucio De Re
Let's take a step back here, and stop treating jerks like Kurt (or me, for that matter) the way they treat the ideas they perceive to be hare-brained. It's weird that with all the time in the world to "think before posting", knee-jerk reactions still find their way to a mailing list like this one

Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!)

2018-10-07 Thread Digby R.S. Tarvin
A native Inferno port would certainly be a lot easier, but I think you might be a bit pessimistic about would can fit into a 64K address space machine. The 11/70 certainly managed to run a very respectable V7 Unix supporting 20-30 simultaneous active users in its day, and I wouldn't have thought pl